WhoSaidWhat

Registered bored user

whosaidwhat wrote:
mischeif954 No, actually, I'm just removing myself from the site, permanently. Have fun in your ignorance.
whosaidwhat wrote:
Unfortunately, I find myself agreeing with Squrlz. There are a couple of people on here that I find myself disagreeing with often, even when I try to ignore them and simply stay away from them. I'm not saying that they come after me; its that I find myself unable to stop myself from calling them out on their bullshit and misinformation, and it frequently gets very heated. I think it best for both me, and the board as a whole, if I also bow out. This site has been a lot of fun over the years, but I feel that it is going down hill lately, and I fear that I am part of the reason. So, in order to (hopefully) calm things down a bit, I'm bowing out, as well. Its been fun, people (and aliens, not gonna leave you out, Zig), and I will certainly miss some of you. Best of luck with the future!
whosaidwhat wrote:
mischeif954 How, exactly, am I to provide "proof" of my own personal experiences? I mean, I can tell you about them, which I've already done, but you seem to want a video or something. Also, as usual, you have either totally missed my entire point, or you just choose to ignore it. I'm going with the latter here, as you seem to have a habit of it. Have fun in your ignorance, I'm done with you. Don't bother replying, as I won't even read it this time.
whosaidwhat wrote:
mischeif954 When you start living in the real world, instead of the one inside your head, then you can start talking to me about this subject again. Until then, fuck off, you idiot. You want me to provide the burden of proof? Why don't you? Where are YOUR numbers? Either way, you STILL are totally missing the point; most likely because you have your head so far up your ass, and believe all the bullshit you have been fed your whole life. Bullshit like how Europeans went to Africa and FORCEFULLY TOOK blacks to sell into slavery. Here's how it really happened: THE BLACKS IN AFRICA SOLD THEIR OWN PEOPLE INTO SLAVERY. If you, like your black brethren, are trying to get "reparations" for slavery, then go back to Africa, and demand them from the descendants of YOUR OWN PEOPLE who sold your ancestors into slavery, not from me, or any other white person. Oops, that was probably racist of me to say that. Of course, if it was you, it wouldn't be racist, just because you are black. Theres that double standard that doesn't exist again...
whosaidwhat wrote:
mischeif954 Yes, I'm sorry, but here in the real world, blacks really do get jobs based entirely upon the color of their skin, while whites don't get them based entirely upon the color of their skin. I get that you've never seen these practices before, but I have. You keep denying it to yourself; you may even start to actually believe it, eventually.
whosaidwhat wrote:
mischeif954 No, not fair enough. It doesn't surprise me that you "don't recall" our previous interactions on here. No, you haven't come out and said directly, "blacks should get jobs based entirely on the color of their skin", but you do support "affirmative action", which enspouses that EXACT idea. Still sound like a falsehood? And yes, there are people who get jobs based entirely upon the fact that they are black. In fact, in the Deep South, businesses are given "quotas" that they are legally required to follow. These quotas require that they have at least a certain percentage of black or other minority workers on the payroll. This is what is known as "affirmative action". This is government created, sponsored, and enforced racism. As I have told you before, if we both apply for the same job, and you, as a black man, get the job instead of me, even though I am better qualified, then it is "affirmative action". If, on the other hand, I get the job instead of you, even though you are better qualified, then it becomes racism. See the double standard yet?
whosaidwhat wrote:
holygod Exactly. I wonder how long it will be before law enforcement starts "laying in wait" for people based on information like this? Perhaps, in the future, law enforcement will start trying to ticket people based solely on information from services like Google. Instant information is a wonderful thing, but what are the chances it will wind up being the end of human society?
whosaidwhat wrote:
5cats When did I try to change the subject? When did I accuse you of trying to change the subject? Why is it ok for NF2 to be wrong, but you felt the need to correct me? Lets see if you even attempt to answer a single one of these questions simply and directly, or if you do more of your usual and try to confuse the issue and turn your own hang-ups back on me.
whosaidwhat wrote:
mischeif954 Sadly, you still just don't get it. No, you haven't ever came out and said that you believe that way. However, you really should go back and read some of your posts again. We've crossed paths before on this issue. You feel that its ok for a black person to get a job based entirely upon the color of their skin, but its racism when a white person gets a job for the same reason. You feel that its ok for a black person to say certain words that a white person isn't allowed to use, but it is racism if you turn it the other way. You feel that black people should get special privileges based on the color of their skin, but that its racism if the tables are turned. All of this is based on things that YOU have posted on here before. See the problem yet? I seriously doubt it. Keep repeating this to yourself until it sinks in: RACISM IS BAD, IN ANY FORM, NO MATTER WHO IT BENEFITS. Now do you understand my position? That is what I am saying here, and it is ALL I have been saying, the entire time we have ever discussed issues like this.
whosaidwhat wrote:
Does this really surprise anyone? Ever wonder how Google Maps knows what traffic conditions are for a given area? Data from cellphones. How do those signs over highways that tell you the average travel time to a particular exit know the average travel time? Thats right, information from Google and Apple, which they get by monitoring cellphones. I though this was already common knowledge?
whosaidwhat wrote:
mischeif954 No, I am not attempting to "get under your skin". I'm just calling things as I see them. You are so far inured in your idea that all whites are racists and no blacks are that you are unable to see the real world. Try to learn a little, and keep up with the modern world.
whosaidwhat wrote:
5cats And you are now doing one of your other usual stupid things and trying to project your hang-ups and stupid mistakes on others. This is exactly my point: you got caught saying something stupid, and are now trying to redirect it onto me. Guess what? As usual, its not working. You are only showing, yet again, how pitiful you are. Grow up, already. I've seen such tactics many times before. Usually, on an elementary school playground. Then again, you probably like hanging out on school playgrounds, don't you.
whosaidwhat wrote:
5cats Are you really that stupid? Oh, thats right, I realized that you ARE that stupid, long ago. I don't know why I even bother trying to talk to you. You are just as bad as The Idiot Monk. Worse, even, maybe. You post a bunch of stupid bullshit, without even paying attention to what you post. Then, when someone calls you out on your bullshit, its magically their fault. So very typical.
whosaidwhat wrote:
5cats Posted by NF2:"You conveniently do not mention that this dossier was started and funded by a Conservative Republican."

Your next reply is:"Started... but continued by whom? Who paid the final tab? That's who is responsible."

So, why is it that I'm wrong about who started it, but he wasn't? You never even attempted to dispute him when he said that a Republican started it, you just agreed, then went on to give your spiel about how only those who finish it are to blame, and no one else. See, this is why no one believes any of the stupidity you like to rant on about. Your responses seem to be driven by who you are replying to, instead of any kind of actual information. I have NEVER even ATTEMPTED to say that Hillary, or the DNC, are not responsible; simply that the guilt is SHARED by whoever started it, and everyone else involved. That has been my ENTIRE point all along. You tried your best, really, you did, to distract me from my point, and failed. Miserably. As usual. Understand now? I somehow doubt it...
whosaidwhat wrote:
monkwarrior Oh, I'd love to "mess with" you. Like to arrange a meeting some time? I travel a lot with work, so I shouldn't be too hard. Fucking retard.
whosaidwhat wrote:
boredhuman Parroting my responses back to me does NOT indicate any kind of understanding of them. Especially when you constantly show that you clearly don't have the slightest clue what I was talking about. Thats why I asked if you were ignoring what I said, or just didn't understand what I said. I am beginning to lean toward the "didn't understand" option.
whosaidwhat wrote:
mischeif954 Because it is a clear double standard, that black idiots like you can't see, because your head is so far up your ass. Thats why its a "HUGE issue".
whosaidwhat wrote:
holygod I've already come to my conclusion about The Idiot Monk. He is so fucking retarded, its amazing to me that he knows how to breath on his own. Bets that he has to wear a set of headphone 24/7, and the only thing he hears through them is, "breath in...breath out...breath in...breath out"?
whosaidwhat wrote:
5cats Try learning how to actually perform math before using a calculator. If the information in entered incorrectly, the answer will also be incorrect. Garbage in, garbage out. Much like how your mind works. All you feed it is garbage, then you come on here and spew that garbage out at all of us. You are just as stupid as The Idiot Monk, and you are proving it, yet again.
whosaidwhat wrote:
monkwarrior The answer is only 1 if you are a total idiot, and don't understand how to math, like you, you fucking retard.
whosaidwhat wrote:
jaysingrimm Spacing shouldn't be needed to make the problem clearer. A number right up against a parenthesis means to multiply that number by the answer of the problem inside the parenthesis, period, no exceptions. How could it be any clearer?
whosaidwhat wrote:
monkwarrior I really don't recall asking for any of your inane stupidity. Your example with the calculator above is flawed, as the first time, it was entered incorrectly. Thats what you, along with tons of others, fail to realize: calculators only work if you give them the proper information. Garbage in, garbage out. You don't understand simple mathematics, and you are proving so, again, and again, and again, and again. Just shut up with your ignorance already, then go back to school, and actually pay attention this time, since you clearly didn't the first time around. Dumbass idiot.
whosaidwhat wrote:
I find the entire concept of "emotional support animals" to be a bit odd to begin with. Then, factor in the fact that, as an example, an airline is NOT ALLOWED to even ask if an animal is for "emotional support". I feel that in order to take an "emotional support animal" into ANY public area, you should have a certification from a doctor saying that you NEED this animal, and you should be required to PRODUCE said certificate upon request. No certification, because you "left it at home"? No problem! Your ass isn't getting in with your animal. Too many people with absolutely NO "emotional support needs" use the loopholes in the system to take their pets with them, simply by claiming that it is a "support animal", because they know that no one is allowed to call them out on it.
whosaidwhat wrote:
boredhuman You are ignoring everything I have said. Deliberately, I suspect. Either that, or you are incapable of understanding what I have said. Which is it?
whosaidwhat wrote:
mischeif954 No, I don't always check here every day, so replies could be days in coming. Again, everything I have said has gone miles over your head, apparently. I'm going to go out on a limb here, and guess that you are black. Am I wrong?