normalfreak2

Registered bored user

Always on the side of logic and reason.

normalfreak2 wrote:
megrendel The only difference is, I HAVE NO CHANCE OF BEING ON TIME MAGAZINE. Trump has been on the cover plenty of times.  Why fake it?
normalfreak2 wrote:
megrendel I mentioned that.....

How about my first point where there's VIDEO AND AUDIO of the POTUS doing EXACTLY what you said NO ONE  doing?  He only started doing it once he could blame a Democrat or Obama for.
normalfreak2 wrote:
5cats BECAUSE THE SOURCE HAS BEEN FOUND GUILTY IN COURT OF LAW FOR DOING THESE THINGS.  It's not attack the source when it's true.  He's done it MULTIPLE times in the past.  This is a legitmate concern because HE's actually done those things before!
normalfreak2 wrote:
5cats A health producer in ATLANTA Georgia knows next to NOTHING about the investigative journalism that's done in NEW YORK.  Did I simplify this enough for your addled mind?
normalfreak2 wrote:
Just to clarify matters:
  • No one with a brain thinks Russia did not try to influence the election, just as the US has tried to influence elections of other countries. 
  • So far the only thing that can be attributed to Russia (or Wikileaks depending on which reports you listen to) was to uncover the corruption and deceit of the Democratic Party. 

What corruption was uncovered?  John Podestas Risotto recipes?  The one I remember is Donna Brazille giving questions to Hillary, that bothered me. Also the DNC's attempt to favor Hillary over Bernie.  They definitely sided against him. But honestly there wasn't much in those e-mails.
normalfreak2 wrote:
5cats Except President Trump has been denying any Russian influence at ALL.  No qualifiers just stating they didn't do anything.  http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/21/politics/trump-russia-hacking-statements/index.html

There are a ton of links in this article that link  you to videos of Trump denying Russia did anything whatsoever.
normalfreak2 wrote:
5cats Wait the DNC party line is to blame Obama for choosing Party over Country?  OKAY!
normalfreak2 wrote:
megrendel The subject of Collusion is a none issue.  No one has ever claimed that influence is not an issue.


WRONG or can you not listen to the POTUS in these videos?  The PRESIDENT WAS denying there was any influence from Russia in the election for MONTHS he finally changed his tune when he could blame Obama for it.
normalfreak2 wrote:
But how can the non existent issue be an issue.  Oh I understand Trumpkin Logic.  Anything can be an issue if you can blame it on a Democrat!!  If it can be routed back to a Conservative it can't be true and they can never be blamed.  


Now honestly there's a legitimate concern that Obama did in fact play politics with this decision.  I'm sort of sympathetic to it because Trump was on the Campaign trail stating "fake news, the system is rigged, etc" however with that said Obama did play the wrong card.  He played party over country.  He should have announced the investigation last year.
normalfreak2 wrote:
It's amazing that Sarah Huckabee Sanders can rail about fake news when earlier in that same briefing she stated that no one will be kicked off of Medicaid with the passage of the Better Care Act.

That's fake news right there.  The delicious irony is astounding.  But we are a clickbait society so that didn't get any coverage.
normalfreak2 wrote:
The only part of this that's interesting is a view inside our POTUS's deranged mind.  He's been on TIME plenty of real times.  Why bother putting up phony Time covers?  It's a silly thing to do when you've legitimately been on the cover.  He just loves fake and misleading news!  Just like when he called into New Agency's as "John Baron" to give an interview about himself.
normalfreak2 wrote:
trimble If I were you, I'd not make any claim based off of O'keefe.  He's been found guilty in a court of law of heavily editing and smearing people before.   Everything you get from his sources should be heavily scrutinized. 
normalfreak2 wrote:
aladinsballs Pretty much nailed my concerns.
normalfreak2 wrote:
mistaza First problem is coming to a conclusion before the fact has been verified.  You started off saying "if this is true"  Since we don't know if it's been truly unedited as O'Keeffe has been guilty of before, we shouldn't take this as anything other than a repeat of his Planned parenthood videos.  I'll reserve judgement in this case until it can be verified.
normalfreak2 wrote:
trimble Obama put politics over country.  He thought announcing Trump was under investigation would have looked bad.  Big mistake.  
normalfreak2 wrote:
melcervini uhhh he probably should  have gone to the doctor, that sounds pretty fucking serious.  Disgusting but serious.
normalfreak2 wrote:
Okay, so a Medical producer has an opinion.  Congrats!  Side note this is what we get with cable news.  They are in it for the money.  No different from Fox, No different from MSNBC, no different  from Breitbart or Redstate or Rush Limbaugh, or Sean Hannity.  Just look for differing opinions.  The truth is hardly ever from one side.  It's usually somewhere in between.
normalfreak2 wrote:
abortabortabort There very well could be, that's why I try to rely on multiple sources or different sides of the story.  
normalfreak2 wrote:
Those look incredibly painful

normalfreak2 wrote:
Say what you want.  When CNN fucks up, they fire people, what happens when a false or misleading story is posted on Breitbart or say redstate?  No one get's reprimanded or fired.  I am Fully in support of fighting against for profit media.  It is a problem but don't ignore the BS on the right and only focus on the "liberal media".
normalfreak2 wrote:
fancylad It's no  different than what Fox does or any Cable news does.  It just reinforces relying on multiple sources to get different  sides of the stories.
normalfreak2 wrote:
holygod speaking for myself here I was in Junior high when this movie came out.  I know what it is now after really thinking about it.  I never saw this in theaters.  
normalfreak2 wrote:
I have no freaking idea.
normalfreak2 wrote:
squrlz4ever I agree with you.  Of the usual political spectrum posts we have a lot of our Conservatives are pretty Liberal on Economic policies.  The only two that are consistently Conservative on Economic issues are Richanddead and dromed.  I agree with you and I sympathize for them.  I despised Clinton, the simple fact this election came down to the TWO most disliked candidates was ridiculous.  The middle class and the poor have been completely shat on.  Trump is steadily moving forward with an even larger dumping.  Unfortunately i also have no sympathy as i want all of the GOP's plans to be implemented and pass.  I think once they live in the world the GOP wants we'll really see a revolution.
normalfreak2 wrote:
trimble I fear the day we go full on anti intellectualism.  Rule of the stupid by the stupid can only be bad for us.