Jimmy Planket

Registered bored user

lockner01 wrote:
squrlz4ever I thought the same thing.
lockner01 wrote:
waldo863 He could have gone to the bathroom.
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior That was the second PC I had. Brings back memories.
lockner01 wrote:
5cats since you're doubling down on the 'boy' comment.  Tell me when does your next government payout cheque arrive?  Maybe if you stopped living off tax payers money people would listen to your opinion.
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior if there is only one god then why does the bible say  "Thou shalt have no other gods before me"?
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior you're unable to answer a question so how can there be any discussion.  When you get backed into a corner you shout troll.  Try to not get so emotional about it.

What kind of monk acts like this?
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior i guess you win.  Wow you put forth the perfect argumment. the ethical equation. clap clap
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior "come back and we can have a discussion" That's the biggest joke I've heard in 2018 or maybe since 1999.  You are unable to have any kind of discussion.  I've tried time and time again.

I would say I tried on many accounts but you wouldn't realize what that actually meant.

Can you please explain what you mean by "anyone can see you're delusional now, demanding i've done something that you'v'e done."

You refuse to condemn pedophilia in the church. It's a pretty binary issue. So either you're ok with the pedos or Fancy is correct and you're in this for the long Troll.  
lockner01 wrote:
woodyville06 I had to rewatch it to catch that part.  I shut it down for a second time.
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior I'm not sexualizing anything -- you did. And you've defended pedos. But now we're in a circle.  How many times has the label verp vortex been labelled on you? How many accounts have you had that have been banned?

Let me ask you one more time -- do you condemn the acts of pedophilia that have taken place within the church of the god that you believe in?

Your not a monk.  Just saying you're a monk doesn't make you a monk.

You're a troll and a bully.
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior Sorry you brought up children first as you have before.  You've defended pedophiles in the link you have provided.  
While you yourself might not be a pedophile you have no problems defending the actions of pedophiles in the church you believe in.

Just calling yourself a monk doesn't make you a monk.  I have an uncle who is an Augustinian monk. It took him years to get there. I respect him.

The fact that you think you're a monk and call yourself a monk is disgusting.  You're the lowest of the low.

And "So, since you don't care to tell us your name or credentials, will you at least tell us your school so we can report to advise that one of their employees has this sick equation in their head at all times?"  Is a threat.


Publish your name. or at least the city you live in.
lockner01 wrote:
daegog I respect and support anyone for their beliefs or orientation and how they identify.  But I think someone has to come up with an acronym or term that flows easily.
lockner01 wrote:
Women have double the genetic code and 1 extra chromosome?  
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior If you look at this thread you're the one that claimed children went to University.  You have a history of defending pedophiles in the church and the link you provided supports that.

The personal threat isn't very monk-like.  What kind of monk are you?  or are you too ashamed to tell us?
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior You're the one that brought up children.  You've done it in the past many times.  You've defended pedophiles.  I'm just trying to expose you.  You're the one that threw this tread off track not me.

And you're still unable to tell us what type of monk you are.  
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior Still not able to answer the question.  I love that when you get backed into a corner you start insulting.  That's very monkish of you .  What kind of monk are you again?

I'm sure you'll go back to your old ways and start deleting comments.
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior I'm sorry but you're the one that keeps linking to a thread where you defend pedophiles.
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior have you read the thread you keep linking too?
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior So the answer = more than one.  In fact the answer probably isn't 1 it's 9.
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior I don't know why you keep linking to a thread where you defend pedophiles.  Most adults realize there is a difference between a child and a teenager.  If you're old enough to vote and old enough to die in a war you are not a child.  If you are 10 months younger than that age you are not a child.

However we now how much you like children.
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior deflecting again.  Why not just answer the question?
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior You do know that the vast majority of university students are not children, don't you?  There may be the odd 17 year old freshmen but I wouldn't call someone of that age a child.

However everyone around here knows how you feel about children though.  How you really, really, really like them.
lockner01 wrote:
monkwarrior ok, So how many accounts have you had banned on this website?
lockner01 wrote:
5cats you actually just called me boy? So you and I are going to get into personal insults?  I expect that from Monk but I thought you would be above that.  Remember what they say about people that live in glass houses.