geobas1

Registered bored user

geobas1 wrote:
monkwarrior actually hans blaster is a broomhandle mauser (c96) or one hell of a copy of one with bits added. It's was one of the first semi auto handguns. It was first produced in 1896, and forgotten weapons has a couple videos on it. 
geobas1 wrote:
Ah another person found gun Jesus.  Overwhelming majority of his videos are outstanding. 
geobas1 wrote:
My favorite is simple.  Beef and noodles. Not so much a recipe as a process.

Homemade noodles:
Salt--some
Eggs--2 or 3 depending on how many people you want to feed
Flour--enough.
 
Beef. 

Let noodles dry for a couple hours before cooking and cook until done.  Season to taste. 

Btw my wife hates this recipe.  "That's not a damn recipe"  but she makes them the same way now after I showed her how and she can't write it down as a recipe either.  

Serve with real mashed potatoes.  

2 1/2 lbs potatoes(Yukon gold preferred) simmered until tender
1 1/2 sticks real butter
Milk-enough
geobas1 wrote:
This supports my belief that all involved should be charged under the rico statutes.   They've operated their church as a criminal enterprise charge them as such. 
geobas1 wrote:
LordJim yeah I feel bad sometimes, but the only time they make a peep is when surprised by someone and thankfully they calm down quickly too so it isn't an all day every day all hours thing.  Just when he wants to be heard EVERYONE HEARS. 
geobas1 wrote:
Gotta have 2 dogs.  I recommend a territorial German Shepard, and an obnoxiously loud hound.  The Shepard handles the assault and the hound lets everyone in a 3 block radius know shit is going down. 

Seriously If I get a package both my neighbors know.  The hound dog's bay carries right thru the house and down the street.  In the house it make your ears ring. 
geobas1 wrote:
geobas1  monk look you can believe what you want.  I don't begrudge you that, and I admit it isn't entirely impossible for me to be wrong about there being no god, but it is going to take a lot more than a video best summarized as "the Bible is semi accurate about history from the time it was written" to convince me.  

 People seek answers it is a big part of how we have become what we are.   thousands of years ago those answers were beyond our reach and we filled the gaps with the wonder of the almighty.  It was a simple answer for a simple folk who needed a purpose and so they created a purpose and it was good.    IMO That's the true creation story the story of the creation of god .  
geobas1 wrote:
Don't know for sure wasn't alive then, but pretty sure Abraham Lincoln was a real guy but doubt the whole vampire hunter thing. 
geobas1 wrote:
Fuck this guy with a big stick,  literally. 
geobas1 wrote:
I believe in absolute ownership of self above all else, so ultimately I have no say in what others do with themselves and as such my opinion matters for fuck all.  I know and embrace that. 

That said I feel for these people and how they feel but there are a few aspects I can't wrap my head around.  Not feeling right or as you truly feel or want to be, ok everyone has some aspect of that and can relate in some way.  The problem for me arises from the fact you can't truly change a man into a woman or a woman into a man. Don't get me wrong I support their RIGHT to live anyway they want as whatever they want.  My goal isn't to judge or invalidate. We can cosmetically approximate a transition but a full functional transition isn't really medically possible.  And I support their RIGHT to cosmetically transition and live however they like.  But they are giving up functionality for cosmetics, and that confuses and worries me.  It's rarely a case that lower function with higher cosmetics is a good answer.  I wonder if they might be happier long term if they were more accepting of themselves and able to live a life of love and acceptance meaning both them loving and accepting themselves, and others loving and accepting them.

Again they are adults they can do as they like and ultimately it doesn't matter what anyone else thinks about it pro or con. 
geobas1 wrote:
I don't go. My opinion on them is I don't feed seagulls for the same reason I don't go to strip clubs. The more you give, the more they want and all you get is shit on by a nasty bird. 
geobas1 wrote:
daegog I agree the two in the video look on the deflated side to me.   personally I like a more round shape but(t) that's a bit excessive. Flat butts make me think they look like dudes butts and I'll let Gerry judge those. 

I have nothing against d's and dd's. 

Overall the ultra skinny grosses me out, I would rather have a little extra rather than not enough. 

Oh and of the Kardashian girls I always thought Kourtney was the hot one. 
geobas1 wrote:
punko overall I agree and share your thoughts on his method but just want to acknowledge I'm probably on the fussy side.  I just said it the way I did because I suspect the person in the video is likely a trim carpenter so he's approaching the door as he would any other painted work he does and I have to concede a few points on that basis.  I don't ever fill nails with caulk though.  They always sink even in trim and if you use too much it's more difficult to sand smooth.  Some would say the drywall mud I use for filling nail holes would be sacrilege too though. it sands smoother, again as long as it's painted stain requires filler. 

I'm not a averse to trying different things in woodworking as in life I try to keep an open mind, I've just tried that and feel it's more work for a poorer result. 
geobas1 wrote:
punko I wouldn't go that far.  Caulk on the non glued joints of complex moulding build ups that are gong to end up painted isn't a cardinal sin imo.  I don't on furniture moulding build ups I glue them instead, but on painted trim work in a house wouldn't think of not using it.  My experience is it does a better job of not cracking when the wood trim moves differently than the wall Or a shoe moulding moves differently than the base. But in nail holes or to rebuild a profile that's damaged like in the video, no that's what filler and epoxy are for. 
geobas1 wrote:
SHOULD, no absolutely not.  They evolved to eat primarily a meat based diet supplemented with what they could easily forage for. No part of the selective breeding we have done was to change their dietary needs. Them living without meat is akin to us surviving without drinking water.    It can be done by eating food high in water content, but no sane doctor or nutritionist is going to recommend it.  But the opposite is true too with the recent issues with the grain free dog foods. 

COULD, yes it is technically possible.
geobas1 wrote:
I don't know, but I'd guess these people want to feel like a part of a group but want it to be a "different" group.

  I listen to a lot of metal and there are themes of Satanism in it. (Danzig, Ghost,Slayer) But to me it doesn't really have any meaning.  It's just someone singing a song about something that's make believe, just like most of the other songs. 
geobas1 wrote:
you can shit on this if you want, but Airwolf.  I was at the right age when it came out. I know it doesn't hold up today but I loved that show. I was 9 when it hit tv screens so old enough to be into a helicopter action show, but young enough not to know it was campy and complete bull shit.
geobas1 wrote:
punko yeah I thought the same.  Some swear by bondo but I usually use a standard wood filler if it isn't structural and wood epoxy if it is. Also glue used on panels appears to be gorilla construction adhesive,  good stuff but not what I'd use for thin panel glue ups.  It's thick viscosity makes it difficult to apply thinly enough and still get full coverage. 
geobas1 wrote:
holygod best ever for me was tool.  Second stage at Lollapalooza 93 they moved to the main stage for the second half the tour. I also saw nin in 94.  Oops was 95 on nin. 
geobas1 wrote:
They are guilty of fraud.  Bobbitt will blow thru anything he gets his hands on that's why he was homeless.  I don't want to sound heartless, but I have addicts in my family. I've seen this shit first hand.   Until they want to get clean and do the work themselves for themselves they are better off if you don't give them a dime.  

Anyone who gave is guilty of criminal stupidity and wishful thinking. 
geobas1 wrote:
Also the fact the earth moves around the sun was discovered in ancient times forgotten, rediscovered by Copernicus, verified via the telescope by Galileo. Accepted by clergy (scholars of the time) then later denied by clergy. It was a process of hundreds of years before it was widely accepted.  
geobas1 wrote:
semichisam01 I think that ones been pretty well accepted as well today but yeah there was a history of ridicule around that one.  Another was the last time the Cascadia subduction zone  (fault) went off.  There was a guy (I'm foggy on the details) who said this inland damage in Washington or Oregon was done by a massive tidal wave due to it being salt water damage and he was ridiculed to no end.  They figured out later it was the last time the Cascadia went off and there was also a massive tidal wave documented in Japan at the same. Japanese history marks it as a orphan (unexplained) tsunami. When it goes off again the Pacific Northwest is screwed. 
geobas1 wrote:
That's both true and not true.  Accepted theories start as outliers and are often ridiculed for a while before evidence can corroborate the theory. Not saying we need to listen to every crack pot loon, but many early proponents of current accepted theories were looked at as crack pots when they announced their theories.  

If you want to see a real example look up the history of plate tectonics.  
geobas1 wrote:
daegog imo that's too kind for her whatever she should get it should be slow and painful. 
geobas1 wrote:
geese are rats with wings.  They shit everywhere spreading filth and disease.  In my former state they infested the drainage ponds they had at every housing development.  They would end up salmonella infested sewage pits, and because of federal migratory game law you can't touch or harass them in any way. They can fine you if your dog chases a goose.