DuckBoy87

Registered bored user

DuckBoy87 wrote:
*Eyes water up*
DuckBoy87 wrote:
"To be continued..."
I waiting to see some Super Mario stunts!
DuckBoy87 wrote:
scheckydamon So that's why Lois Lane and Bruce Wayne got hitched... (sort of true story)
DuckBoy87 wrote:
Apparently all Nelson has to do is run into the gate and the sheep will follow. Make a small gate that only Nelson can exit, and there ya go, he'd be the best sheepdog, if the movie Babe is to be believed.
DuckBoy87 wrote:
Rottweiler + Coyote
WeilerECoyote
DuckBoy87 wrote:
profworm Dunno what you're talking about, because ain't no Cheese Nips in stores around here, only the king; Cheez-Its!
DuckBoy87 wrote:
Are these even legal?
DuckBoy87 wrote:
Happy Hitler's Birthday! Oh... wait..
DuckBoy87 wrote:
oobaka No, it makes tall people look thin.
DuckBoy87 wrote:
captkangaroo Taking a look at his channel, he does have a couple "weight loss progress" videos. Unfortunately, they're dated 2016. Hopefully he's still working on it. But hey, at least, in this video, he's active.
DuckBoy87 wrote:
shieldbash Oh yeah, I definitely only do it for fun and in no way take this seriously. Like you said, it's not that much better than a horoscope.
DuckBoy87 wrote:
emmettyville Works with short people, too
DuckBoy87 wrote:
normalfreak2 It really doesn't change all that much for me.
I still think the cops should never have been involved.
But now, I think whoever did call the cops should've talked to the 2 men first.

Did the other people in there purchase something, or with someone who purchased something?
If yes, then no change.
If no, then they should've been asked to leave as well/the two men shouldn't've been asked to leave.

I don't know the demographics of everyone else in the shop, so I withhold my opinion of 'race'-is. (Phrased that way because there are no subraces within humans. You are either human or not. Different cultures, different ethnicities [that really ties to culture or region based if anything {discussion for a different day}], sure, but not different races)

Ultimately, they were denied the bathroom without a purchase. They were asked to leave (albeit by the police), and they stood there and questioned it. Rightly, or wrongly, had they excused themselves and stepped out of the store and filed a complaint, handcuffs wouldn't've been used.

I guess what I'm saying is that the manager is a pussy.
DuckBoy87 wrote:
rukittenme Especially after I eat chili! Watch out!
DuckBoy87 wrote:
holygod Oh! I gotcha. I don't often pay attention to -who- posts the articles.
DuckBoy87 wrote:
holygod Isn't it better than 5CNN?
DuckBoy87 wrote:
wibble4321 Theoretically, should our federal government dissolve, the states should be able to govern independently. That is all in theory though. In a practical sense, some states would do abundantly well, some will scrape by, and others would falter completely.
DuckBoy87 wrote:
Gerry1of1 It took me to your third post to fully understand what you were saying.

Gerry is wanting this:
If an online business is based in state X and the purchaser is in state Y, the purchaser will have a sales tax as if the online business was a brick and mortar store and the purchaser was in that store.

Sort of like even though I'm in PA; if I travel to MD, and walk into a store, I'll pay the MD tax and not the PA tax.
The online purchaser is "walking" into the seller's "store". The purchaser had to travel, albeit virtually.
DuckBoy87 wrote:
I took this exact test before and got ISTP. This time I got INFP.
I definitely think I better identify with ISTP, though.
DuckBoy87 wrote:
dm2754 So no one in that shop purchased anything? Interesting.
DuckBoy87 wrote:
dm2754 Okay? And?

The facts are that they were -perceived- loitering.
That they were asked to leave.
That they didn't.
That they were now trespassing.
That the cops were called.
That the cops asked them to leave.
That they didn't.
And that they were escorted out in handcuffs.

Even if the business model is to loiter, once the employee says I don't want you loitering anymore, please leave; you leave. File a complaint with corporate. Most companies will bend over backwards if you complain about the smallest things on their facebook pages.
(Again, I'm not agreeing with the employee)
DuckBoy87 wrote:
normalfreak2 I don't disagree. I'm not saying any wrongdoing occurred by the two men, or the cops themselves for that matter.

I don't drink coffee. I don't go to coffee shops, much less Starbucks, so I don't know the atmosphere that they have, except white girls not even-ing. That's standard business practice at most places I frequent.

I thought I had read that Starbucks had also refused to let a cop use the restroom without a purchase as well, so it's at least consistent with that.
DuckBoy87 wrote:
monsta420 Exactly. That's why I said it needs to be reworded. Thanks for agreeing with me!
DuckBoy87 wrote:
DuckBoy87 I'll preface this by saying the cops shouldn't have been called in the first place, but sitting in a Starbucks for no apparent reason is also known as loitering, which led to trespassing, which led to the arrest, so I guess any interpretation of that initial sentence could be correct!
DuckBoy87 wrote:
"Kevin Johnson wants to personally apologize to two men who were arrested while sitting inside Starbucks for no apparent reason."

Maybe a bit nit-picky, but you may want to reword that.
Two men were arrested. They were sitting inside Starbucks for no apparent reason.; is how I initially interpreted it.