I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
LatestPopularMost BookmarkedMost EmailedTop RatedMy FavoritesRandomChat
AllGamesFunnyEntertainmentQuizzesWeirdTechLifestyle, Arts & Lit.News & PoliticsScienceSportsMisc
Submit Content  





rss

friendsmore friends | add your site
Asylum

Holy Taco

Funny Videos

BuzzFeed

NothingToxic

Oddee

Mousebreaker

Online Games

Eat Liver

Online Games

Gorilla Mask

Full Downloads

Norway Games

Damn Cool Pics

Kontraband

Extreme Humor

X Hollywood

I Dont Like You

123 Games

Hollywoodtuna

Funny Games

Cool Stuff

Viva La Games

X - Vids

Smit Happens

Funny Videos

Funny Stuff

ebaumsworld



Back to Listing

McDonalds Tells Employees To Avoid Their Food

Hits: 7304 | Rating: (3.3) | Category: News & Politics | Added by: Jerm_Leather
Page: 1 2 Next >   Jump to: Bottom    Last Post
schecter5
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 412 Posts
Thursday, January 02, 2014 3:28:09 AM
@keith, that's the main issue.

20 years ago, minimum wage was a living wage. You started at the bottom with that and worked your way up to a higher paying position over time and with effort (think factory work, manual labor, fast food type things.)

Over time, a decent living wage has grown far beyond the confines of minimum wage. You know how people are always saying that having a bachelors now is like having a high school diploma 20 years ago? It's actually true in respect to how common they are, as well as the wages received when you adjust for inflation. It's not just fast food workers that deserve to get more money, it's honestly nearly everyone.

There is no logical reason that a CEO should make over 2 million a year with an additional several million as a bonus because "they worked really hard".

Call me a communist, but spread the love. There is no reason that a ceo should work for a million times the rate of an entry level worker, whi

keith2
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 2541 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 4:13:39 PM
My job requires a damn college degree and make roughly what those fast food workers are asking for as far as hourly wage. They need to freakin get real. If they start making what I make, I will definitely be very upset.. and applying to McDonalds for a nice stress-free burger flipping gig raking in the big bucks.

HumanAction
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 2353 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 11:10:34 AM
@McDuff

Governments should be encouraging corporations to take action

Unfortunately, the only way government can act is by the execution of power, which is nothing more that the ability to hurt people. For every action that government takes, regardless of the people that may benefit from it, someone gets hurt - be it financially, physically, or intellectually.

With this in mind, we should be extremely careful when allowing government to act, because someone will be made to pay a price for it. Unfortunately, you, me, and people like us, rarely have the ability to persuade government to hurt someone else; on the other hand, corporations do. I think you will find that most oftentimes, we pay the price of government actions, not rich CEO's or corporations.

Why should we continue to open doors for them?

HumanAction
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 2353 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 11:04:56 AM
@McDuff

instead of just shrugging our shoulders and refusing to take action because its difficult

I'm not suggesting that we do any such thing. I'm merely pointing out that *someone* must pay for the increased labor wages and that, most likely, it'll end up being the people you're trying to help.

Can you think of any way to force the business owners - the people who control the prices and employment opportunities - to foot the increased cost? We would need to enact a government that strictly controls prices, wages, additional compensation, and employment opportunities. Essentially, we would need the government to completely take control of business.

Does this seem wise to you? History suggests not.

HumanAction
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 2353 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 11:01:20 AM
@McDuff

I agree they are circular but dont agree that benefits are responsible for low wages

Sure... I'd actually fault the Fed and WWI for kicking it off but the specific trigger point doesn't really matter anymore. The point is that we are stuck in a situation where redistribution causes low wages and low wages cause redistribution.

McDuff73
Male, 30-39, Europe
 649 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 10:42:56 AM
And yes I agree someone will foot the bill but instead of just shrugging our shoulders and refusing to take action because its difficult to resolve we should in actual fact be doubling our efforts to make things more equitable.
Governments should be encouraging corporations to take action instead of corporations paying to get their representatives into the political establishment and blocking any efforts to make corporations socially responsible.

McDuff73
Male, 30-39, Europe
 649 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 10:39:46 AM
HumanAction I agree they are circular but dont agree that benefits are responsible for low wages I think the opposite is true low wages existed before benefits did, benefits are a result of corporations refusing to pay decent wages.

HumanAction
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 2353 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 9:33:02 AM
@McDuff

However, none of this considers whether or not raising the minimum wage will create the desired outcome - more spending power for the disadvantaged.

I think you will agree that the increased wages must be paid for by someone, right? The money must come from somewhere. So, who then can potentially pay for it?

1. Employers (higher labor costs)
2. Taxes (corporate subsidies, etc.)
3. Consumers (higher prices)
4. Employees (fewer hours, loss of employment, decreases to other compensation, etc.)

Considering this, which group do you believe to be most likely and least likely to pay for the increased labor costs?

HumanAction
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 2353 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 9:27:34 AM
@McDuff

Have you considered that the two - low wages and high entitlement spending - may be circular in cause?

For example, let's imagine that there were no minimum wage and that I were offering you a job for $0.25 an hour. Even if it was the only job you could find, would you take it? Of course not. This point alone establishes the fact that an effective minimum wage exists sans a legal minimum wage. Why? Because you cannot live on $0.25/hour and neither can anyone else (in the US).

Now, if the government decides to subsidize your low wage with welfare or assistance - provided you have a job - then suddenly you're willing to work for $0.25/hr. Why? Because that wage doesn't matter - the assistance will make up the rest.

Perhaps we should begin to consider how entitlement spending enables low wages.

MeGrendel
Male, 40-49, Southern US
 4190 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 8:57:09 AM
Jerm_Leather-"having work experience, or a college degree doesn't Guarantee you a good paying job. Hell, it doesn't guarantee you anything."

I agree. I know entirely too many idiots and asswipes that have both, but can't hold a job because they are idiots and/or asswipes.

Jerm_Leather-"I've known many college graduates that work at freakin' Starbucks, or McDonalds because That's All That Is Available."

Many times it's because that degree in 'women's studies', 'liberal arts' or ' aboriginal macrami' doesn't exactly translate into a job in real life.

Jerm_Leather-"should we still turn a blind eye on Everyone that works a craptacular minimum wage job and assume they are lazy or uneducated?"

Of course not. After all, many of them will soon turn 17 and find out they get a better job if they work at it.

If, on the other hand, you're 40 and STILL on the fry station...it's not exactly McDonald's fault.

Jerm_Leather
Male, 18-29, Western US
 885 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 8:49:06 AM
Most of you seem to have a pretty decent, and intelligent point to make in this discussion. The one thing I don't hear anyone saying though is what seems to me to be the most obvious point. ..having work experience, or a college degree doesn't Guarantee you a good paying job. Hell, it doesn't guarantee you anything. Furthermore, when it comes to either being homeless or being able to scrape by Every Single College Graduate will take a crappy McD's job in a heart beat. What jobs are most prevalent in our society? Crappy ones for gigantic corporations that have 6 or more locations in each town or city. The argument that 'all you have to do is be Worth more to get a better paying job' is completely ludicrous. I've known many college graduates that work at freakin' Starbucks, or McDonalds because That's All That Is Available. That being said, should we still turn a blind eye on Everyone that works a craptacular minimum wage job and assume they are lazy or uneducated? Absolutely Not.

McDuff73
Male, 30-39, Europe
 649 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 8:06:58 AM
Backagain you might want to check your figures apparantly Walmart made a profit of $15.7 Billion in 2012 so they would if your other figures are not incorrect lose 1/3rd of their profits but would have increased the amount of money in shoppers pockets.

MeGrendel, theres nothing foolish about my point just because you dont agree with it doesnt make it wrong, its a perfectly valid point, I pay taxes my taxes pay benefits most benefits in the UK go to people in employment, effectively subsidising LOW wages.

McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 13145 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 7:46:09 AM
@Nickel2

On the internet!

Nickel2
Male, 50-59, Europe
 4331 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 7:43:22 AM
Where did I see this sign?

JadesDitoyr
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 465 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 7:27:31 AM
@lauriloo

While machines aren't convenient to us just yet, we will grow used to them. We got used to self-checkout, didn't we? Those aren't convenient either.

Unless, as a culture, we reject automated ordering at fast food joints; they will come.

ATMs instead of bank tellers. Self-Checkout at grocery stores. Some sit down and eat restaurants have the tablet ordering system in place and they're doing well.

MeGrendel
Male, 40-49, Southern US
 4190 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 7:14:06 AM
LegosFTW-"Minimum wage isnt enough to live on, fact."

Minimum wage ISN'T SUPPOSED TO BE enough to live on, fact. (agreed with the rest, btw)

McDuff73-"in effect our tax dollars or pounds go straight into the pockets of these corporations"

Quit using that asanine argument. It doesn't float.

McDuff73-"if they were paid a living wage the corporations may take a slightly smaller profit"

Or, more likely, increased unemployment and higher prices.

Here's what will happen if you raise minimum wage to $15.
Many will lose their jobs due to automation and reduction of work-force. The first to go will be the crappy workers.
Many CURRENT MinWage workers will be displaced by more capable/ harder working people who are currently working harder jobs for $14.50 an hour and would gladly take an easy job making $15 an hour.

Net result: Most current workers at McD's will be unemployed and will not unde

McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 13145 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 6:47:47 AM
They're not worth $15 an hour plainand simple want to make more get off your ass and make yourself something worth more. Will we be increasing that pay for every place with min wage even mom and pop stores or just the ding fries are done ones?

Bakcagain21
Male, 18-29, Europe
 553 Posts
Friday, December 27, 2013 2:39:29 AM
Illusion that I always here in these debates. Companies might make slightly less profit. Wrong, you increase a wage say by $2 an hour. they work 8 hours a day that's an extra $16. They work 6 days a week $96, They work 50 weeks a year, $4800 an employee, they have 1,200,000 employees (Walmart) that's $5,760,000,000 from profits of $13,000,000,000. That's half the profits. That money won't be going into reinvestment overseas expansion new technology or anything. A company not sit and let it go, prices will rise.

So if you want to raise minimum wage fair enough have the discussion. But do not just say companies will make slightly less profit and have a proper discussion about the inflationary effects it will have. As a slight increase multiplies massively over a year and across an organisation, as you go up.

Draculya
Male, 40-49, Asia
 11548 Posts
Thursday, December 26, 2013 10:02:09 PM
Your problem isn't so much that your minimum wage is so low, but that your cost of living is so high.

Minimum wage in the US is the equivalent of junior- to mid-level manager pay grade in Hong Kong/ Singapore and Executive pay in China/ Malaysia/ Indonesia.

The differences are mostly down to taxes, insurance costs, and the minimum wage itself.

McDuff73
Male, 30-39, Europe
 649 Posts
Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:02:23 PM
most of these poorly paid workers take subsidies from your and my government, in effect our tax dollars or pounds go straight into the pockets of these corporations, whereas if they were paid a living wage the corporations may take a slightly smaller profit and it would only be a slightly smaller profit but the subsidies could be removed and we could all pay a little less tax putting more money in our own pockets, but hey if you want to keep lining the pockets of already wealthy corporations keep on denying people a living wage.

McDuff73
Male, 30-39, Europe
 649 Posts
Thursday, December 26, 2013 7:59:46 PM
no Andrew155 not strawman just you being called out for talking bullpoo.
I dont know one person thats sat with their partner broke out a calculator and figured out wether or not they can 'afford' to have a child.
And my hypothetical person is just as valid as yours ;).
Gerry I worked at McD's as a teenager and there was an eclectic mix from teenage students like myself 20 something dossers, middle aged trainee managers and older recently unemployed, there is no 'average' McDonalds worker.

Andrew155
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 2564 Posts
Thursday, December 26, 2013 7:46:38 PM
Some places like Wawa already do it.

It's going to happen, and controlling the price of labor will only expedite the process.

Besides, it's already been happening for the longest time now. Most of the cashiers in my supermarket are gone. And much of the burger making process is *already* automated. Fast food jobs have already been taken by machines, even with low labor costs.

Just because you think mandating a 15 dollar wage will work out for everyone doesn't mean it will.

lauriloo
Female, 40-49, Midwest US
 1805 Posts
Thursday, December 26, 2013 7:28:18 PM
I've been to a few McDonalds with ordering kiosks, mostly in Europe. Never saw anyone actually using them though. I think it was La Guardia where I went to a food court and they had a system where you order off an iPad, it spits out the bill, you walk over to the central cashier, pay and walk back to the food place to pick up your food. Not that convenient and I had to help an older guy use the iPad just to order some fries and a Coke. I don't see people being replaced by machines at food places any time soon.

botfly
Male, 50-59, Eastern US
 608 Posts
Thursday, December 26, 2013 7:13:00 PM
Achievement is a goal by definition, and being rewarded for being better than everyone else, is ,and always should be rewarded by better pay and status. Otherwise we would all be living in Detroit.

ajd121
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 577 Posts
Thursday, December 26, 2013 6:59:49 PM
Wait the CEO of McDonalds makes more than it's average minimum wage employee??? Get out of here!

Page: 1 2 Next > 

You Must be Signed in to Add a Comment

If you've already got an I-Am-Bored.com account,
click here to sign in.

If you don't have an account yet,
Click Here to Create a Free Account
 

Back to Listing ^top


Bored | Suggest a Link | Advertise | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.