I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
LatestPopularMost BookmarkedMost EmailedTop RatedMy FavoritesRandomChat
AllGamesFunnyEntertainmentQuizzesWeirdTechLifestyle, Arts & Lit.News & PoliticsScienceSportsMisc
Submit Content  





rss

friendsmore friends | add your site
Asylum

Holy Taco

Funny Videos

BuzzFeed

NothingToxic

Oddee

Mousebreaker

Online Games

Eat Liver

Online Games

Gorilla Mask

Full Downloads

Norway Games

Damn Cool Pics

Kontraband

Extreme Humor

X Hollywood

I Dont Like You

123 Games

Hollywoodtuna

Funny Games

Cool Stuff

Viva La Games

X - Vids

Smit Happens

Funny Videos

Funny Stuff

ebaumsworld



Back to Listing

England's Prince Charles Gets A (New) Job

Hits: 6899 | Rating: (2.5) | Category: News & Politics | Added by: Gerry1of1
Page: 1 2 3 Next >   Jump to: Bottom    Last Post
PierreJeanFR
Male, 40-49, Europe
 1337 Posts
Tuesday, May 15, 2012 10:09:00 AM
USA!USA!
Turdburglar: you are part of United States of As*holes my friend.

McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 13456 Posts
Tuesday, May 15, 2012 5:43:02 AM
As is often the case with bigots, you're projecting your own faults onto your target group.


Much like you!!You should try to pratice what you preach.

Buiadh
Male, 30-39, Europe
 6653 Posts
Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:32:00 AM
@turdburglar - lol irony right there.

turdburglar
Male, 30-39, Western US
 3684 Posts
Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:25:59 AM
Who cares.. why is this european cr@p on here. The whole of Europe, Canada, and ESPECIALLY the Queen and royal famly can suck it. What a waist of a continent. USA! USA! USA!

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11515 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 4:04:18 PM
I suppose you think they just magically got that massive fortune through hard work and caring about the commoners?


You suppose all sorts of rubbish as part of your silly fantasies and inconsistent communism. Maybe you even believe some of it.

If you want to know what I actually think, you could try reading my posts in this thread. But why change the habit of a lifetime by letting reality get in the way?

You really sum up the Brit sterotype a know it all who knows far from everything.


As is often the case with bigots, you're projecting your own faults onto your target group.

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11515 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 4:01:25 PM
Oh ya that's why we fought a revolution to make a system almost exactly the same LOL!!


This is what I actually said:

The US system is based on the UK system because the founders of the USA looked at it and said "We like almost all of that, it's a good system."


Which is what happened. Meet the new boss, mostly the same basis as the old boss. Same basis for the legal system, same basis for elected government, same language, etc. Not exactly the same, but very close.

Gerry1of1
Male, 50-59, Western US
 33910 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 3:56:23 PM

MacGovern
"@Gerry1of1, Did you know you don't have to support royalty to be a princess?"

good one

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11515 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 3:55:09 PM
Getting rid of your royalty wouldn't end the UK so that's a stupid point.


Yes, it is. So why are you making it? Ah, I know. It's because you're stupid. But we already knew that.

LOL ya right!! you should really check the history of the crown there.


You are now arguing that the queen obtained her wealth by murdering people.

Seriously? You really meant that? There was me thinking that she inherited it. The cover-up of the British civil war of 1953 must have been amazing. Do you think aliens did it? Did you get your insider info when you were kidnapped by the aliens?

McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 13456 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 1:15:08 PM


lawndartsftw
Male, 40-49, Canada
 1815 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 1:00:33 PM
@mcgovern1981. I have no problem with your side of this issue, but, reading your posts on this thread, I can't but be reminded of "The Holy Grail", when King Arthur asks directions of Michael Palins' character, a member of an "autonomous collective" !!!

boogarcym
Male, 40-49, Europe
 241 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 11:42:32 AM
@McGovern1981 - They are unemployed and receive money from the state - as socialist as it gets

McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 13456 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 11:32:42 AM
Darwin would be proud a position of no use proclaimed your ruler not by the people but by god isn't that the premise of royalty?

McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 13456 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 11:27:40 AM
It's ironic a country that like to praise it's socialist policies supports royalty. How's that for socialism??

McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 13456 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 11:26:14 AM
@Gerry1of1

Did you know you don't have to support royalty to be a princess?

Gerry1of1
Male, 50-59, Western US
 33910 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 11:21:27 AM

@ McGovern1981 - After reading your posts and laughing, I will say this... Your knowledge of British Royalty is unmatched.

McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 13456 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 11:20:33 AM
I'm still waiting to see you stand by your own argument and call for the ending of the USA.



Getting rid of your royalty wouldn't end the UK so that's a stupid point.

Bill Gates didn't seize his wealth through murder and force.


And neither did the queen.



LOL ya right!! you should really check the history of the crown there.

The US system is based on the UK system because the founders of the USA looked at it and said "We like almost all of that, it's a good system."

Oh ya that's why we fought a revolution to make a system almost exactly the same LOL!! Now where our king again?

I suppose you think they just magically got that massive fortune through hard work and caring about the commoners?

You really sum up the Brit sterotype a know it all who knows far from everything.

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11515 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 11:19:37 AM
Angilion, you're right. Who cares about basing a government on equality when there's money at stake.


There is not and never has been a government based on equality. The USA certainly isn't one, since you have a very strong class system and very limited mobility between classes.

In any case, the government of the UK is run by the prime minister, not the queen. So your argument wouldn't be relevant even if it was true.

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11515 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 11:13:19 AM
Bill Gates didn't seize his wealth through murder and force.


And neither did the queen.

However, the whole of the USA did seize its wealth through murder and force. By your argument, that means that the USA shouldn't exist.

You keep trying to throw the communist label at people.


Only people who advocate that private held assets are seized by the state so that the state can control the means of production. Because, you know, that's what communism is. People who advocate communism are communists. It's what the word means.

The US system has its flaws but we thank god we are citizens and not subjects.


Do you really think that the UK is ruled by the queen, who oppresses the serfs, blah blah blah? Seriously? You're that ignorant?

The US system is based on the UK system because the founders of the USA looked at it and said "We like almost all of that, it's a good system."

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11515 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 11:06:26 AM
Here's the difference we admit to it now. Your royalty still keeps it for their own personal gain


"You" still keep it for your own personal gain, and lie about it, and complain about anyone else who you think is doing the same thing, i.e. adding hypocrisy as well.

The royal family isn't keeping it for their personal gain. You haven't been bothering to read any of this thread, have you?

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11515 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 11:02:55 AM
The money they "give" you was yours to begin with.


No, it wasn't. Your silly fantasies are not reality.

Once again call me a fool but I'm not the one paying taxes to a name and nothing more.


Neither am I. Your sillt fantasies have nothing to do with reality.

I'm still waiting to see you stand by your own argument and call for the ending of the USA.

Actually, I'm not. I know you're a hypocrite. You're not even a proper communist. You're just pretending in your little fantasy world.

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11515 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 11:01:08 AM
Exactly so why keep them they serve no purpose.


1) Head of state, a required functionality for a country.

2) Cultural heritage.

3) Political safety net in extreme circumstances.

4) A lot of money.

There's 4 major purposes off the top of my head. It makes no sense to spend a billion a year on replacing them with an alternative which would only fulfill 1 of those purposes.

McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 13456 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 11:00:58 AM
@Angilion

The money they "give" you was yours to begin with. Once again call me a fool but I'm not the one paying taxes to a name and nothing more.

McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 13456 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 10:59:07 AM
@Angilion

Here's the difference we admit to it now. Your royalty still keeps it for their own personal gain and continues to act like their s**t dosen't stink while actually serving you no purpose.

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11515 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 10:58:09 AM
Keep your head in the sand pleb the crown loves the money they earn on your backs


You are trolling or both laughably ignorant and monumentally stupid.

The monarchy *gives* money to the country. We get money from them, not the other way around.

My head isn't in the sand and there's no monarchy on my back. The government is far more controlling and has far more de facto power than the monarchy, as do big businesses...but I guess you'd get rid of them too, since you're a communist. But then your version of the politburo would be on my back instead.

Your ridiculous view of the UK is entirely a fantasy of your own devising. It was never as you describe, not even in early medieval times. You're babbling rubbish and making a fool of yourself.

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11515 Posts
Monday, May 14, 2012 10:50:40 AM
As for the land they took they never earned it.


So...for fun, I'll apply your "reasoning" to your own country.

You advocate removing the monarchy and stealing all their land and assets because they inherited them rather than owning them and because their far-off ancestors got the land through conquest. So you're going back at least as far as 1688 (a coup), probably at least as far as 1066 (the last outright conquest) and possibly far back into prehistory (the beginning of monarchy).

The present USA consists entirely of land it inherited from the past USA, which the past USA got by conquest. Using your "reasoning", the entire USA should be ended and all its lands and assets seized, presumably in the south by Mexico and in the north by descendents of the people who lived there before the USA.

Are you going to stand behind your "reasoning" and call for the end of the USA?

Page: 1 2 3 Next > 

You Must be Signed in to Add a Comment

If you've already got an I-Am-Bored.com account,
click here to sign in.

If you don't have an account yet,
Click Here to Create a Free Account
 

Back to Listing ^top


Bored | Suggest a Link | Advertise | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.