Dracula, Frankenstein and Zombies [Graph]

What you're looking at there is your epistemology and you don't need to give it a name.

Lets say for example if there were a hell of a lot of 13-17 year olds on a site that posts 3 anti-religious posts a day (usually devoid of fact, reason, argument).

Just as an example.

Which I concede to you is no basis for a belief system. All ideas should be weighed equally before making a decision. And decisions ought to be reconsidered in light of new discoveries.

sorry for touching a nerve, jeez

You clearly didn't like the tables being turned. You got upset. Yet still didn't concede the point.

Worst of all, you're talking about Atheism as the sole result of facts, as if your average Atheist is a Philosophy and Theology scholar, and that this is the way Atheists are made.

Whilst that thought may make you feel all warm inside, I feel that quite a few, I'm going out on a limb here:

May simply be influenced with good old fashioned social conditioning.

Lets say for example if there were a hell of a lot of 13-17 year olds on a site that posts 3 anti-religious posts a day (usually devoid of fact, reason, argument).

Opinion 1: You claim I misuse the word "fact" by claiming it can be possessed and then claim facts are possessed.

If something is truly a fact of the universe then it is not something to be possessed by any one group, otherwise it's more of an opinion.

In other words, the facts that you say atheists claim to "possess" are in fact possessed by anyone who chooses to believe in the validity of the scientific method. I'll go out on a limb here and claim that this group includes the majority of atheists and religious folk alike.

I'm not claiming superiority nor am I trying to bash Christianity. I'm just saying that any atheist who can be deemed "ignorant of the facts" isn't a very good atheist and is comparable to a christian who hasn't read the bible.

Atheists are to facts, as are internet commentators to massive penises.