 STDCarriers
Male, 18-29, Western US
 1 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 20, 2009 2:48:54 AM
HaHa, nice - I'll sue you for being better than me.I get crap like this all the time, but it's more like "I found out someone listed me as having Genital Warts on you website when I (my friend, my boss, etc.) Googled my name. Then if a post gets removed for some TOU violation they blame me for still being on Google. It's surprising how many people don't know that Google determines their listings by copying random information and that webmasters are not responsible for what content from their sites end up on search engines, how it is displayed, or where it ranks. |
|
 FelanSlvr
Female, 18-29, Southern US
200 Posts
|
Monday, October 05, 2009 9:31:22 PM
I would be shocked if any attorney accepted that case. You can copyright names but now words found in the dictionary. Pathetic. |
|
 pui
Female, 18-29, Canada
635 Posts
|
Saturday, October 03, 2009 5:16:47 AM
If it really does not relate to that keyword at all, it wouldn't be ranked higher than his site. Learn you some SEO. |
|
 tlshaman
Male, 13-17, Western US
72 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 11:52:36 PM
what a dick |
|
 slayer50515
Male, 13-17, Eastern US
537 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 10:04:34 PM
LOL someone forgot to black out his name and his friends!
"Aditya Singh"
Way to go! |
|
 WeenieDog
Male, 13-17, Southern US
180 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 2:57:17 PM
Remove the I-A-B watermark from the picture on your website and provide source or emailsfromcrazypeople.com will sue you. |
|
 abby0315
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
160 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 1:13:34 PM
I bet the keyword is....SUE. |
|
 Mikeado
Male, 13-17, Europe
1383 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 11:11:15 AM
Well if a "jedi" is going to sue Tesco for not letting him wear a hood, then sueing someone over a petty internet matter isn't that wierd. |
|
 crucifyed4us
Male, 18-29, Southern US
37 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 10:43:59 AM
Not sure on the legal precedence of that one...let's check with a lawyer! |
|
 blubonx6
Female, 18-29, Western US
116 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 9:46:28 AM
Sue-happy? Maybe your buisness is failing for other reasons and now you must compensate buy sueing?? Sad, very sad. |
|
 rifter
Male, 30-39, Midwest US
226 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 6:53:19 AM
This reminds me of a lawsuit a while back from a guy to a website owner. He admitted that he hotlinked a pic off the website and wanted it put back up because it was a main point of his site. He, in effect, stole the image and was upset that it disappeared. |
|
 clever-chan
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
336 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 6:32:34 AM
Am I the only person who noticed that the address not blurred is the recipient who most likely posted this on the internet so everyone could lawl with him? Everyone's trying to track him down when he isn't the douche who sent it... |
|
 Squareknot
Male, 13-17, Midwest US
19 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 6:28:44 AM
I love how he think he owns the internet :\. I also love how sue-happy our country has become. |
|
 xxPinkxx
Female, 18-29, Canada
1213 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 6:00:58 AM
dying to know what the keyword was for this |
|
 cha3370
Female, 18-29, Europe
89 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 5:58:52 AM
His niche business can't be doing well if he's resorting to threatening to sue over the use of similar key words |
|
 Batmanners
Male, 18-29, Canada
1889 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 4:43:48 AM
The fact that everything is blurred out is rendered completely obsolete when the guy's e-mail address, which happens to be his name, is displayed.Also, if only the address were blurred out and the full text shown, it would have been easier to read, and probably a lot funnier. |
|
 GRadde
Male, 18-29, Europe
1243 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 2:29:32 AM
>k10josumn
If rqsupergrove is right, then I guess you just turned to be correct also. Cakes all 'round. |
|
 Nidonemo
Male, 18-29, Western US
6450 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 2:25:04 AM
Silly human, the internet cannot hear you! :D |
|
 k10josumm
Male, 13-17, Western US
327 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 2:15:57 AM
lol for some reason i think this guys asian. is the name singh asian? |
|
 rgsupergrove
Male, 18-29, Australia
847 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 2:08:27 AM
and his name is Aditya Kumar Singh (http://digg.com/users/codematics) |
|
rgsupergrove
Male, 18-29, Australia
847 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 2:07:15 AM
I found this on the guy http://www.propeller.com/member/singhadi... |
|
rgsupergrove
Male, 18-29, Australia
847 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 2:04:04 AM
hahah #2 |
|
teiso
Female, 18-29, Australia
856 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 12:53:31 AM
They need to get some perspective on life and realise that they have no grounds to sue, however, it is both impolite and annoying to use a keyword to get higher on google when your site has nothing to do with that keyword. Not so much for other sites trying to get higher, but for people who are looking for things related to said keyword and just get a bunch of stuff completely unrelated.You kind of just look like a douche when you make such a big deal out of it, though. |
|
 SlasherCount
Male, 13-17, Western US
22 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 12:43:20 AM
Huge moron. |
|
 LandoGriffin
Male, 30-39, Western US
2091 Posts
|
Friday, October 02, 2009 12:27:35 AM
This can't be real. The only comeback for this would be to say "No, YOU remove YOUR site from Google!" It is so strange that they are saying that they "optimized" their site to be #1 and now they are mad that they are #2 - then I guess you will just have to "opitmize" a little better!Our friend Singh has just as much right to be #1 on Google as anyone else. For that matter, on what grounds would the #2 site sue them? I hate it when people go around saying they want to sue this person or that but don't have any actual legal reason to do so. |
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
