CrazyKatie Female, 13-17, Eastern US
18 Posts
|
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 2:56:55 PM Intertusting... |
|
Max_Normal Male, 30-39, Europe
   238 Posts
|
Tuesday, September 22, 2009 3:54:18 PM These all prove that Jeebus Cripes exists and his dad made the whole world and he hates gays, muslims, commies and europeans. Amen. |
|
Fantom2993 Male, 18-29, Western US
   90 Posts
|
Monday, September 21, 2009 7:56:01 PM WHY THE FORK IS THAT ON HERE?!?!?!?! |
|
Skreshavik Male, 18-29, Western US
   276 Posts
|
Monday, September 21, 2009 4:01:52 PM Eistein's theory of Relativity does seem flawed in that it says that space can bend...correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't space a vacuum, or in other words, a literal "0"?It would make sense why starlight deviations can never be calculated accurately with the equation. |
|
Lionhart2 Male, 40-49, Australia
   5383 Posts
|
Monday, September 21, 2009 3:38:29 PM > wiredtobits > Lionhart2 check out... the problem that I have with the balloon metaphor is that you ar... If you are...The problem I'm having is that you're reading someone else's comments and thinking I said them, I never mentioned balloons. I'm a batpoo crazy young Earth creationist, remember? The whole Big Bang thing is one big joke to me. |
|
anyer Female, 13-17, Europe
   78 Posts
|
Monday, September 21, 2009 12:20:01 PM wow no words...
|
|
baileyabb Female, 18-29, Canada
   562 Posts
|
Monday, September 21, 2009 9:50:08 AM @ almightybob1Thank you!!! I have a friend who's still waiting on me to explain the 'truth' behind "facts, and theory's " Sometimes.. there is no use..let people believe, or not believe the nonsensical. |
|
almightybob1 Male, 18-29, Europe
   1536 Posts
|
Monday, September 21, 2009 7:39:49 AM I'm surprised gravity isn't on that list. For as much as we know we cannot even seem to categorize it into something outside a theory.
/facepalm When will people learn that the word "theory" has a different meaning in science? |
|
RecycleElf Male, 13-17, Europe
   1959 Posts
|
Monday, September 21, 2009 7:09:20 AM @wiredtobits wow gee... someone is waering their big hat today -.- |
|
wiredtobits Male, 18-29, Europe
 37 Posts
|
Monday, September 21, 2009 4:17:48 AM Lionhart2 check out:http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20... the problem that I have with the balloon metaphor is that you are using a 2 dimensional object in 3-D space to describe an action which occurs in 4+ dimensions. If you are happy with those thoughts then yes, the balloon metaphor makes sense. if you are not happy thinking about things like that then it looks like the dots on the balloon are moving radially from a point in 3-D space, which looks like how an explosion in space would look. Teleportation gets us away from the the idea that things are moving through space, and back towards - something really funky is going on if inflation was symmetrical (if the Copernican hypothesis is true) then from our frame of reference velocities would be unaltered and so we'd continue to see horses' arses wherever we looked |
|
Lionhart2 Male, 40-49, Australia
   5383 Posts
|
Monday, September 21, 2009 3:54:08 AM > sonikku > I think that if the answers were easy enough for an ordinary guy to solve them with one post in a discussion on I-A-B, they would have already solved themWho you calling Ordinary!??? ANd I already DID solve them in one post - "Rule 34. End of story." |
|
sonikku Male, 18-29, Europe
   84 Posts
|
Monday, September 21, 2009 3:29:28 AM @soupkidLOL |
|
sonikku Male, 18-29, Europe
   84 Posts
|
Monday, September 21, 2009 3:28:19 AM > Lionhart2 > Well if its your Opinion and you're an astronomer, that just about makes it hard fact, right?you mean that anstronomers know more about astronomy than you do? yeah, I'm pretty sure about that. I think that if the answers were easy enough for an ordinary guy to solve them with one post in a discussion on I-A-B, they would have already solved them. |
|
BunnyNaku Female, 18-29, Midwest US
   2111 Posts
|
Sunday, September 20, 2009 11:14:07 PM tons of interesting articles.. however the axis of evil still has me confused @-@ |
|
soupkid Male, 18-29, Western US
   162 Posts
|
Sunday, September 20, 2009 10:57:17 PM What a coincidence. I have had many sleepless nights wondering about these very things. |
|
Lionhart2 Male, 40-49, Australia
   5383 Posts
|
Sunday, September 20, 2009 10:24:11 PM > 13 Things That Do Not Make Sense > 13 of the most perplexing mysteries of the world that still confound usThey can all be explained by Rule 34 though. |
|
Nidonemo Male, 18-29, Western US
   6453 Posts
|
Sunday, September 20, 2009 10:20:17 PM I was expecting something more along the lines of:- How humans still exist. - How society can even exist. - Why people buy crap and don't realize it doesn't do anything. |
|
gongxi Female, 18-29, Eastern US
   111 Posts
|
Sunday, September 20, 2009 9:47:10 PM I have always been obsessed with the bloop |
|
vitaliy Male, 13-17, Western US
   1467 Posts
|
Sunday, September 20, 2009 9:07:47 PM I'm gonna leave this one to shun |
|
Alphawolf Male, 18-29, Midwest US
   150 Posts
|
Sunday, September 20, 2009 8:27:39 PM Hmm... |
|
janus_games Male, 18-29, Western US
   103 Posts
|
Sunday, September 20, 2009 7:27:01 PM The expansion that is believed to have occurred worked not by giving speed to the particles that existed but by stretching the space between them, it is more like teleporting than accelerating ============================================= Right idea, terrible analogy.It's like drawing little dots on the outside of an uninflated balloon and then blowing up the balloon. In this case, the 3D universe is on the surface of the balloon. Galaxies and planets on the surface of our balloon spread out. You can't point to any one spot and say, 'There! That's the center of the universe (remember only the skin, not the inside of the balloon, is our universe)'. It's not that the physics that existed at the start of the universe was different to the physics we know now, it's just the physics that we're used to. It's argued as both the high energy state and the way the numbers baloon around the 0-time asymptote. In fact, the entire point of Hawking's 'No Boundaries' proposal is |
|
LazyMe484 Male, 18-29, Canada
   4886 Posts
|
Sunday, September 20, 2009 7:00:00 PM
Well, I WOULD read a bit more about it but I figure anyone who (a) can't spell my name right when its right in front of him and (b) wants me to accept that Teleportation is science fact, maybe I'll just skip the reading bit and back slowly away, keeping my hands in plain sight and uttering reassuring sounds.
Win! You amaze me. |
|
tvremote Male, 18-29, Eastern US
  65 Posts
|
Sunday, September 20, 2009 6:57:22 PM In this thread: internet scientists |
|
shunpo_31 Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   1308 Posts
|
Sunday, September 20, 2009 6:22:31 PM Actually, Big Bang Theory does not introduce any new ideas that conventional physics cannot describe, given some basic assumptions. The first, which you are referring to, is the attempt of our own physics to explain spacetime's expansion through...um....exactly. We have no idea what the eff is OUTSIDE of spacetime, what the fabric itself is accelerating through. Is spacetime its own dimension? It raises all sorts of interesting questions. The fact that the Big Bang doesn't follow things like, say, the Second Law, is only the most trivial of the questions that give rise when attempting to explain the universe. Hooray the ignorance of modern science! :- ) Gah I love my job. |
|
Lionhart2 Male, 40-49, Australia
   5383 Posts
|
Sunday, September 20, 2009 6:10:51 PM > wiredtobitsWell, I WOULD read a bit more about it but I figure anyone who (a) can't spell my name right when its right in front of him and (b) wants me to accept that Teleportation is science fact, maybe I'll just skip the reading bit and back slowly away, keeping my hands in plain sight and uttering reassuring sounds. |
|