 adam432823
Male, 18-29, Western US
 74 Posts
|
Friday, August 14, 2009 2:38:41 AM
That must have set them back about 50 bucks. I think they spent more on the logo than production. |
|
 SlapChopper1
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
119 Posts
|
Friday, August 14, 2009 1:56:04 AM
this would've been better than the 2 movies starring jessica alba |
|
 vitaliy
Male, 13-17, Western US
1467 Posts
|
Thursday, August 13, 2009 5:04:39 PM
Beautiful, just beautiful. |
|
 HarryBalszak
Male, 40-49, Southern US
1136 Posts
|
Thursday, August 13, 2009 4:52:55 PM
The Thing kinda looks like a Ninja Turtle. |
|
 Bard
Male, 18-29, Canada
99 Posts
|
Thursday, August 13, 2009 10:56:00 AM
I like the part where Sue goes invisible and immediately the two guys run smack in to each other. I don't think the writers actually understood what "invisible" means. Also, why did those henchmen try to simply sandwich ram her with the side of their guns? Is this a new method of apprehension? |
|
 gorgack2000
Male, 13-17, Europe
2426 Posts
|
Thursday, August 13, 2009 9:05:50 AM
Apparently they spent $2 million on the film that they never even intended to release. I don't see why they put this much effort in a dead film? |
|
 OldOllie
Male, 50-59, Midwest US
1053 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:20:39 PM
It may not have been as well produced as the more recent versions, but it was actually a better representation of the original comic books of the 60's. |
|
 Negative_One
Male, 30-39, Western US
2488 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 7:40:45 PM
"Wait, '94 or '84?"
--------------------
Does it really matter anymore? It's all feathered hair and bright clothes. |
|
 Robert_D
Male, 18-29, Canada
477 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 4:36:38 PM
That's actually pretty good for 1984... |
|
 Alpha1971
Male, 30-39, Canada
198 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 4:04:42 PM
Sadly I find this 100X more interesting that the two REAL films released combined. And that the stretching powers of Mr. Fantastic were better realized than that fake looking CGI crap. |
|
 Concetra
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
1019 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 3:30:53 PM
You can watch the entire movie here, Its divided into 9 parts.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omKd_bUQl... |
|
 JRuu
Male, 18-29, Western US
29 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 3:26:25 PM
thats not that bad for an 80's movie |
|
 rook187
Male, 30-39, Midwest US
121 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:46:25 PM
I got a copy of this at Wizard World Chicago 1999. Go to Comic or Gaming Cons and you should have no trouble finding it. A 10 year old with a Mac has access to better FX than Corman had. It's cheesy fun. |
|
 Aretsuku-kun
Male, 13-17, Canada
285 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:44:39 PM
"Anyone know if/where I can get that movie?"Note the word UNRELEASED in the title. |
|
 Treli1337
Male, 13-17, Eastern US
231 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:42:54 PM
or maybe Mad Eye Moody looks like that guy |
|
Treli1337
Male, 13-17, Eastern US
231 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:42:32 PM
that villain looks like Mad Eye Moody... js |
|
 opiebreath
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
14283 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:31:22 PM
Dear 1980's,STOP HAUNTING ME. STAY IN THE PAST! Sincerely, 2009. |
|
 Dfaulted
Male, 13-17, Canada
1614 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:25:31 PM
the thing looks fat |
|
 Skabashas
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
295 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:05:16 PM
Anyone know if/where I can get that movie? |
|
 GRadde
Male, 18-29, Europe
1243 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 1:19:23 PM
>Angelol
True. But they coulda made The Fantastic Three. No wait, that's not right... |
|
 ghostofme
Male, 18-29, Western US
488 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 1:08:08 PM
Still better than the 2005/07 versions. |
|
 osirisascend
Male, 40-49, Midwest US
1618 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 12:44:07 PM
@ TheSharpest: That's the one!!!Good find dude. The rest of the movie is just as bad. |
|
 Genocyde
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
172 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 12:39:50 PM
Stan Lee only signed off on the paperwork to give New Horizons the rights to make a movie...that's it. He didn't have any final editorial say-so in it. With the comic book movie craze of the early '90s and the success of TMNT, Marvel saw an opportunity and jumped on it. The only two mistakes that were made were allowing low-budget studios to make the movies and not insisting on editorial control of these films. Marvel also had success with their many X-Titles during the Jim Lee/Rob Liefeld/Todd MacFarlane days. The only mistake they had made there was letting that talent go. The newer F4 movies were far more suitable than the old ones were. Marvel also learned from their past mistakes. |
|
 skypirate
Male, 18-29, Western US
412 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:44:46 AM
is it 84 or 94? |
|
 Evil_Eye
Male, 18-29, Europe
260 Posts
|
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:54:51 AM
Just watch the ending "TheSharpest" posted and wow... you know what it reminds me of?
Wacky waving inflatable arm flailing tube man!
Wacky waving inflatable arm flailing tube man!
Wacky waving inflatable arm flailing tube man!
|
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
