 ImmortalZach
Male, 13-17, Eastern US
 422 Posts
|
Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:19:05 PM
primetimekin
Male, 13-17, Southern US
7241 Posts Monday, June 01, 2009 2:15:28 PM
"You're not pro-life if you're out killing doctors, ladies and gentlemen."To be fair, they possible saved a few more lifes. Not really, those women must of had a somewhat sound reason for abortion and if they didn't would you want such an unfit mother raising a baby sucking up your tax dollars? Pro-lifers are quick to send someone to war but critics when a women can't raise a baby and needs an abortion. Defend peoples rights, not an unborn babies rights. People are irresponsible, yes, but you can't infringe on their life for an unborn baby. |
|
 miraclewik
Female, 18-29, Asia
128 Posts
|
Saturday, June 06, 2009 12:01:41 AM
Appejoe, I never claimed to be prolife and I'm american. |
|
 appjoe
Male, 30-39, Europe
45 Posts
|
Friday, June 05, 2009 8:17:47 PM
i love americans.......you claim to be pro life yet willingly commit murder do you not read your own bibles you inbreeding child molesting goat drating hypocrites thogh shall not kill?
idiots |
|
 theBSR
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
4166 Posts
|
Friday, June 05, 2009 4:11:16 AM
poo happens......when poo happens to a babykiller, I care even less. |
|
 AmICrazy
Male, 13-17, Midwest US
34 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 11:57:31 PM
Usually I enjoy it when my city is put on National News but not for something like this. This is just horrible. |
|
 welfarepimp
Male, 30-39, Southern US
142 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:17:14 PM
Exactly, damn those rape and incest whores. |
|
 dukat
Female, 50-59, Midwest US
51 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:10:39 PM
It's been reported that the human females only carry to term 1/3 or their fetuses - (without elective abortion) they have spontaneous abortions (miscarriages) 3/4 of the time. Most do not know they were even pregnant. WoMan is the only mammal this happens to. Does anyone think God is asleep here? |
|
Mondo48
Male, 18-29, Southern US
124 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 8:08:38 PM
im not saying he deserved it....but a lotta people would |
|
 Victory7
Male, 13-17, Western US
302 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 4:37:54 PM
@jmuamyThe definition of murder isn't an opinion. Killing a fellow human is not subject to debate, it is what it is. The fetus is a human, and killing it would be murder. Like I have stated before, it's not murder in a legal perspective, and I would hope it stays that way. |
|
 Sydust
Female, 13-17, Eastern US
39 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:34:21 PM
"Pro choice ought to mean choosing to use a rubber or keeping your damn knees together."Yeah those damn rape and incest whores. |
|
 almightybob1
Male, 18-29, Europe
1536 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 1:17:23 PM
"Kill 1 save a thousandthats +999 in my books. Simple math here"
You're right prime. Pre-emptive strikes are the way to go.
Let's kill all pro-lifers, because God knows how many doctors they'll kill in the future, like they did to this guy. After all, a set amount now is surely less than a possibly infinite amount in the future, right? |
|
welfarepimp
Male, 30-39, Southern US
142 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 12:07:01 PM
Can I respond to a response from 10 pages ago?"We used to live in a society that permitted the enslavement of minorities. Should we have just dealt with it?" We did deal with it. On the down side, dealing with it started a war, another reason why I threw the "without adding to the death toll" line in there. As far as the "pro choice / anti choice" argument, the baby boy/girl getting killed doesn't get to choose. Which do you think they'd choose if given the choice? But, I'm sure that's just semantics. Pro choice ought to mean choosing to use a rubber or keeping your damn knees together. |
|
 jmuamy
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
40 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 11:49:17 AM
Victory-- it is not "technically" murder. That is an opinion, not a fact, so you can't claim that it is "technically" anything. |
|
Victory7
Male, 13-17, Western US
302 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 11:08:06 AM
I'm opposed to abortion because it technically is murder. Regardless of what stage the fetus is at, it's murder to kill an unborn child. Do I think it should be treated as a felony crime? No, of course not. I do, however, know that just like Prohibition, if a thing is banned it will always continue to go on regardless of what the law says. At least if it's legal the woman won't have to go to the streets to rid herself of a severely deformed child growing inside her. I oppose it on moral grounds, but I support it on the terms of legality, seeing as the Constitution never makes a note about it, and has never been seen as a real legal issue until just recently. |
|
 Shadow_Wolf
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
19 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 9:31:55 AM
Kdawg wouldn't be laughing if someone late-term aborted his mother, or someone he cared about. No one has any sympathy anymore. |
|
 Falcore
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
187 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 9:02:28 AM
ignorance must truly be bliss eh kdawg? |
|
kdawg
Male, 40-49, Western US
169 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 8:27:28 AM
Haha, now that's late term abortion for ya! I guess if you called him a fetus its ok. Too bad his name wasn't fetus. haha |
|
 Binary101
Male, 13-17, Asia
847 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 8:08:25 AM
personally, i'm all for abortions. - They can solve the population crisis along with contraceptives. Anyway, its the mothers choice to get an abortion or not. The public has no vote in what happens to a mother's fetus. |
|
 Link_Hiei
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
2210 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 6:15:14 AM
"I mean really, is it so hard to just take one for the team and put the child up for adoption? If you don't want it, well okay, but completely denying it of its existence is kind of selfish IMO."
There are plenty of kids in adoption places already. Need to thin those out before more get tossed in there.:)
|
|
 Devi3000
Female, 18-29, Western US
1527 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 4:36:07 AM
Rot in Hell Tiller. |
|
BBQ
Male, 18-29, Europe
239 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 4:17:50 AM
Was his name John Connor by any chance? If so, the alien-robot-invasion-from-Mars might be closer than we think.. Also, maybe he himself was a terminator sent to terminate John Connor as a fetus. I wonder who terminated the terminator? I suppose we shall never know.. |
|
AndroidMetro
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
794 Posts
|
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 1:41:08 AM
Looks like someone gave him a late term abortion. |
|
 PostModsleaz
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
43 Posts
|
Monday, June 01, 2009 10:23:54 PM
"Also.. where do robots come into play here at all? How is that relevant? Because robots are on Mars, the government should be able to claim every woman's uterus as its own public property? I don't think so" clearly it is because we need every human being to fight against the inevitable invasion of alien andriods from mars. |
|
 punkipenguin
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
472 Posts
|
Monday, June 01, 2009 10:17:20 PM
i don't think it's right that this happened, but i can't honestly say i'm upset by it. |
|
 Boadicea
Female, 18-29, Canada
788 Posts
|
Monday, June 01, 2009 10:03:29 PM
I'm pretty sure this was mentioned earlier, but just to reiterate: Late-term abortions generally aren't just some last-minute change of mind. They're on the whole performed on women who found out the fetus has severe medical issues, or on women whose pregnancies are endangering their own lives. Also.. where do robots come into play here at all? How is that relevant? Because robots are on Mars, the government should be able to claim every woman's uterus as its own public property? I don't think so. |
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
