 Apple_18
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
 464 Posts
|
Thursday, January 01, 2009 2:46:07 AM
i dont think id mind a car that pivots cause im no good at parking parallel..dont want the robot. wouldnt mind a squishy outside JUST INCASE i did ever hit anyone..or if anyone ever hit me id prefer a squishy surface for sure..i think they need to work on the blinkers, i dont think one tiny line would cut it. if your blind enought to hit a pedestrian, why would you not be too blind to see a one line blinker? O.obut then again i have to also agree with gorgack. |
|
 Slade8
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
918 Posts
|
Monday, December 29, 2008 5:06:45 PM
I don't even need to say anything. gorgack beat me to it. |
|
 Victory7
Male, 13-17, Western US
302 Posts
|
Monday, December 29, 2008 12:50:10 PM
Why do concept car creators insist on making their cars look like late-edition HotWheels? Why not bring back the wings of the 1950's, or the Studebaker style of the 20's and 30's? Those were the coolest-looking cars in existence. |
|
 gorgack2000
Male, 13-17, Europe
2426 Posts
|
Monday, December 29, 2008 10:52:41 AM
Until they invent a hover-car I refuse to call any of these futuristic. |
|
 vicious_liar
Male, 13-17, Europe
970 Posts
|
Monday, December 29, 2008 6:49:29 AM
A car with a revolving cabin could be usefull, but that car (though it's a prototype) has a top speed of 30 miles an hour! Plus that even though it seems practical, turning your wheels and cabin like that takes more time than actually parking. None of these cars seem actually usefull. |
|
 Kittenluvpie
Female, 13-17, Eastern US
33 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 7:15:56 PM
The first car seems too childish, impractical
(with only room for one person)and creepy. (Robot would just make me angrier.)The second looks like it would get dirty very fast. Third is impractical unless i'm parking slanted and there is a lot of space. The forth was okay. Fifth looks like an accident waiting to happen. Seems useful in Italy tho. Eh, I wouldn't buy it. |
|
 Superjoe
Male, 18-29, Southern US
34 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 6:58:52 PM
Keith if America made a car that justified the cost of a new car, I'd buy one. That being said, my new Volvo is fantastic. |
|
 jinxiejae
Female, 30-39, Western US
833 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 4:25:30 PM
ryan99 the car that spins means that reverse will no longer be neccesary, you dont have to look behind you to back up, you just turn the cabin around and go. |
|
 keith2
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
765 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 3:48:21 PM
Don't buy any of this crap. Get an American car. Preferably UAW built. Seriously people, we gotta get our factories up and running again. |
|
 SoCal
Male, 18-29, Western US
475 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 3:08:28 PM
Oh i def. need those cars so that i can go 80mph on the freeway. |
|
 ryan99
Male, 13-17, Western US
1366 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 3:05:56 PM
This makes me look at the japanese as even more crazy. Maybe two, MAYBE two of those cars are somewhat descent but what the hell? Why the hell would I want to drive a car that spins around AND has a drating gay robot trying to cheer me up or what?! And did you see that stupid personal car! You look like you're being quarentined like goddamn bubble boy! |
|
 Pindragon
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
495 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 12:59:28 PM
They all looked like crap, except maybe that one at 1:02... That one could be alright. |
|
 opiebreath
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
14280 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 10:52:13 AM
Why don't these cool cars ever make it to the roads?:\ |
|
 adarling617
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
94 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 9:52:44 AM
THOSE ARE AWESOME. i like the mazda. |
|
 love_lover
Female, 13-17, Asia
107 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 8:48:30 AM
All i imagine is getting waisted one night, see one of those ugly things on the side of the road and tipping it over.
Because i'd want to. |
|
 Poreka
Female, 13-17, Europe
710 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 8:22:52 AM
They look like children's toys. |
|
 duckinfuh
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
822 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 5:03:16 AM
wow...those sure are some ugly-ass cars. |
|
 FlameOfUdun
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
1014 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 4:43:54 AM
Why do they try so hard to make them look all "space-like"? |
|
 BoomBox
Male, 13-17, Asia
1079 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 4:12:01 AM
I think those are a bit too much. |
|
 Boredx12
Female, 13-17, Europe
1661 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 3:21:57 AM
coool
ugly, but cool. |
|
 DHise
Male, 13-17, Eastern US
795 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 1:15:09 AM
Also, people, there's a reason to why they're called "CONCEPT cars." |
|
DHise
Male, 13-17, Eastern US
795 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 12:56:48 AM
Nifty is one word to describe it. |
|
 xvenomouz
Female, 13-17, Western US
19 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 12:44:43 AM
I thought that was pretty interesting actually.If these cars actually become the cars of the
future, well that's another thing. |
|
 Groogle
Male, 30-39, Canada
1756 Posts
|
Sunday, December 28, 2008 12:39:38 AM
I dont think anyone will take you seriously in your everyday life if you drive around in one of those. Why not just walk instead...You can tell they're trying hard to reinvent the car because the shapes of our current cars are problematic when you try to put electric motors inside them. Last day I was walking down my street and there was this fatso in a smart strolling by... he was twice the size of his car, I dont know how he could even fit in there in the first place. |
|
 jdjd5883
Male, 18-29, Western US
887 Posts
|
Saturday, December 27, 2008 10:41:28 PM
do they really think that those are the cars of the future? |
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
