Page: 1 2 3 4 Next > Jump to: Bottom Last Post
nonamewillfi Male, 13-17, Eastern US
   770 Posts
|
Sunday, August 30, 2009 4:53:59 PM we already have a cure. u just need to make a smoothie made up of about 500 grand in cash then inject it into your blood. |
|
deathxtra Male, 13-17, Western US
   2330 Posts
|
Friday, November 21, 2008 11:42:42 PM who needs a larger population anyways? the world is already way too populated |
|
teph2112 Male, 13-17, Asia
   625 Posts
|
Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:58:24 AM I think it can be used as both really New HIV viruses need to find a new host of cells although its gonna be too late for the ones already infected, uninfected ones cannot be penetrated, and the virus doesn't live long outside a host, so it dies. |
|
Khronnus Male, 18-29, Europe
   290 Posts
|
Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:03:50 AM gatorade777 it is both, they said after the treatment they couldn't find a trace of the virus. Meaning the guy had it before hand. So it was a cure, and then prevention. |
|
xFlashFirex Female, 13-17, Southern US
   78 Posts
|
Monday, November 17, 2008 7:20:40 PM Yay! We cured HIV!Can we move on to cancer now? |
|
gatorade777 Male, 13-17, Eastern US
   738 Posts
|
Sunday, November 16, 2008 8:00:39 PM its not a cure, its a prevention, and for that type of prevention it is to hard and expensive to be used as worldwide use |
|
MikeRulesYou Male, 18-29, Eastern US
4 Posts
|
Sunday, November 16, 2008 4:02:09 PM perhaps he just couldn't take it anymore. sometimes when you're wrong, you want to delete all the evidence of it. because someone who is so intelligent would never be wrong about something so critically important as the mundane topics discussed on an internet forum |
|
sixclaws13 Male, 18-29, Midwest US
   2308 Posts
|
Sunday, November 16, 2008 1:31:47 PM Did cefka get banned or delete all his own posts? |
|
BunnyNaku Female, 18-29, Midwest US
   2111 Posts
|
Sunday, November 16, 2008 10:01:20 AM @sporka: hahaha awesome! |
|
fabarati Male, 18-29, Europe
   90 Posts
|
Sunday, November 16, 2008 5:32:41 AM Exactly what I thought. |
|
xbox011190 Male, 18-29, Western US
   141 Posts
|
Sunday, November 16, 2008 3:46:30 AM ha ha (nervous laugh) just like the beginning of I AM LEGEND |
|
VikingGuy Male, 18-29, Europe
   2153 Posts
|
Sunday, November 16, 2008 3:01:20 AM hey...wait a minute,wasnt the cure for cancer... |
|
bmanthe2 Male, 13-17, Western US
   391 Posts
|
Saturday, November 15, 2008 9:16:42 PM the video went down... |
|
sporka Female, 18-29, Eastern US
   817 Posts
|
Saturday, November 15, 2008 9:07:55 PM "Hey guys, how's that cure on cancer going?" "Uh, it... well, it didn't work, but we might have cured HIV instead." "...oh! Well, that's good then. Keep it up." |
|
sixclaws13 Male, 18-29, Midwest US
   2308 Posts
|
Saturday, November 15, 2008 7:29:28 PM As Mike said, test scores do not fully represent intelligence. However, you are probably right that not many people on this site scored above you. I was simply remarking on the pointless of claiming superior characteristics on the internet. As a side note, my two best friends scored 30 and 28. We had three of the four highest scores in the class. The guy who got a 28 took it stoned, and the guy who got a 30 didn't bring a calculator. Not one of us in is college. |
|
MikeRulesYou Male, 18-29, Eastern US
4 Posts
|
Saturday, November 15, 2008 7:20:02 PM First off, as a biology student, this is not news to me. But it is still ridiculously awesome.Next. ACT scores say nothing about a person's intelligence. Knowledge does not equal intelligence. Anybody can do well on the ACTs and in HIGH SCHOOL (pl;ease, high school is a joke). You are correct, cefka, that you are not ignorant. Because you're at least educated and somewhat knowledgeable. But, if the people accusing you of ignorance are not lying about things you have said, then perhaps you are not as intelligent as I would like to give you credit are. I sincerely hope that you are intelligent, and have more to show for it than ACT scores (Critical thinking skills are a start.) |
|
sixclaws13 Male, 18-29, Midwest US
   2308 Posts
|
Saturday, November 15, 2008 6:53:42 PM "cefkaHey davymid. I bet there are a lot more ignorant IABers than me. Just because I have very rightist views does not make me ignorant. How would you like it if I went around calling every atheist, gay, democrat, a "communist moron?" Oh wait, I essentially do do that. I guess you "tolerent" liberals can discriminate against a religious conservative if you feel the need to. Anyway, I consider myself one of the smartest members of this website; in my high school this year, I was named the top foreign language scholar in the school and I got a 30 on my ACT. If you consider me ignorant, I would hate to see what you consider the rest of the members on this website to be." I got a 31 on the ACT. So f*ck you. Anyone as smart as you claim to be would have enough sense to not claim "to be one of the smartest people on this site". |
|
awesomo Male, 13-17, Eastern US
   240 Posts
|
Saturday, November 15, 2008 1:21:03 PM Of course I understand what all of these ppl r talking about in the vid and in the comments. PSHHHH! Who wouldnt?WTFFFFFF??? |
|
JimboH Male, 30-39, Southern US
   601 Posts
|
Saturday, November 15, 2008 9:58:37 AM "Bone marrow transplants have a high death rate, about a third. Anti-HIV drugs can keep you going for years. Plus there's the problem of 1) finding a compatible donor, 2) finding a compatible donor who is resistant to HIV." Thanks for that answer, Fartacus. Makes sense. With people like you and Angilion, I think we'll find a cure someday. :) |
|
Eichenkatze Male, 18-29, Western US
   779 Posts
|
Saturday, November 15, 2008 3:32:38 AM "Angilion's post"Well that's kind of the point. Finding a cure to HIV would require that it be enacted and put into place quickly and efficiently. Yes, the Virus can mutate and find another way to infect victims, however if a cure can be found it will need to be used fast and effectively. Done correct, you have a higher possibility of wiping out the disease before it can mutate (which isn't a reaction of the virus realizing "Oh crap! I'm being beaten!" but natural time and evolution as the virus spreads from patient to patient.. so if you can beat it quickly, you have a good chance of eliminating it. Which is what the hype is all about. |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1451 Posts
|
Friday, November 14, 2008 11:03:19 PM A couple of caveats to the last post:To have the full monty resistance, you need to inherit the CCR5-delta32 mutation from *both* genetic parents. It's possible to be infected anyway, just very unlikely. It's also possible that at any time a new strain of HIV might appear that uses something else to bind with the cell and therefore isn't affected by CCR5-delta32. So it would be foolish to think of yourself as being immune if you somehow find that you have homozygous CCR5-delta32 genes. |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1451 Posts
|
Friday, November 14, 2008 10:55:57 PM "I've heard of this weird resistance to HIV also.But.. don't we not have a cure to ANY virus?" This resistance functions as one in people who have it. A virus needs to attach itself to a cell in the infected host as the first step towards using that cell to reproduce. That requires a "match" between the two, sort of analagous to plugging something into something else - the plug and socket must fit each other. The delta32 mutation on the CCR5 gene results in a person's cells not having the receptor that HIV (or some strains of it, anyway) uses to bind itself to a cell. So the viruses cannot bind, which means they can't infect, which means they can't reproduce, which means they will in time die and be dealt with by the body's waste handling systems. So it doesn't actually cure the virus, but it stops it reproducing. That means the body is free of the virus in the time it takes for all the viruses to die, which is not long. |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1451 Posts
|
Friday, November 14, 2008 10:36:15 PM "Anyway man I was very interested in your post. Are you a fellow scientist, or interested observer? What's your field of interest? "I'm an interested observer, davymid. My formal qualifications only go as far as A level physics, but I've been interested for as long as I can remember. My earliest memories are of sitting on a stair hallway at home reading an encyclopedia. We had over 3000 books at home, many non-fiction. It was a good start. It boils down to the fact that I like to know how things work and science is a reliable way of doing so. I was asking how stuff worked as soon as I could speak. I think my mother taught me to read in self-defence, so she could tell me to look the answer up in a book when I got too much for her :) My field of interest is whatever my gadfly attention settles on at any given time. Which is one reason why I'm not a scientist. I'd like to be, though. To discover something no-one previously knew would be an awesome thing. |
|
Scotchy Male, 18-29, Western US
   497 Posts
|
Friday, November 14, 2008 9:01:15 PM That pretty cool, maybe soon it will be the end of AIDS and then we can kill ourselves through overpopulation! |
|
opiebreath Female, 18-29, Midwest US
   14283 Posts
|
Friday, November 14, 2008 8:29:50 PM I've heard of this weird resistance to HIV also.But.. don't we not have a cure to ANY virus? |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next >
|