 |
Page: 1 2 3 Next > Jump to: Bottom Last Post
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1448 Posts
|
Thursday, July 31, 2008 1:41:07 AM If you search online for it, you find a lot of scams.You may have ridden in something you *thought* was a water-powered car, like the Genepax one. If it worked, someone would be able to explain how. No-one can. Because it doesn't work. I think scamming people is *not* a good idea. So I explain why. Bashing? Rubbish. I'm just not falling for an obvious scam. I'm listening if you have any explanation as to (a) how it could possibly work and (b) why on earth someone eho invented a device to produce large amounts of electricity from seawater, or anything watery, without any pollution would be trying to sell it to car companies rather than becoming an international hero and the richest person in the world by selling it as a power station. I'm listening. You can support your argument or continue jeering at people who think. Your choice. |
|
usmcgirl4049 Female, 18-29, Midwest US
22 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:22:13 PM I think you guys need to do your research, water powered cars work -I have ridden in one. I would tell you guys where to find the information, but you are probably too busy bashing good ides to freakin' google it. And IMO if you aren't willing to put in that amount of time, you deserve to pay 4 bucks a gallon at the pump. Happy bashing folks. |
|
ecpkngt Female, 18-29, Western US
   87 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 29, 2008 2:00:23 AM lol, hadn't seen the growing earth bit before. Thanks davymid :DIf somebody made a documentary out of it, it must be true! |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1448 Posts
|
Monday, July 28, 2008 9:39:29 PM You've confused two completely different (but equally implausible) claims.One is that you can use water to make an additive to your existing engine to reduce your fuel consumption to a quarter (not by a quarter - you misread that too). The other is that you can have an engine powered by water. The man in question was going to test the first claim. With one engine. Not two. He knows that it doesn't work. He's doing it in a probably futile attempt to prevent gullible people being conned. |
|
cmanatlan Male, 13-17, Western US
   610 Posts
|
Monday, July 28, 2008 6:19:41 PM "cmanatlan: I also read the badly written section detailing the ludicrous claims made by people selling stuff to anyone gullible enough to buy it. However, I didn't mistake it for a statement of fact, as you did, in part because I read the whole article, including the paragraph after the paragraph you read, and in part because I have a basic understanding on what's involved and therefore know that it's impossible. You can reduce petrol consumption to a quarter, but only by fitting an extra engine of another type."Why don't we wait until he builds the engine before saying it only reduces consumption by a quarter. Also I very well understood that both engines would be in the car and that you still need gasoline as well as water. |
|
hooray4hazel Female, 13-17, Canada
   262 Posts
|
Monday, July 28, 2008 10:57:13 AM 5 bucks here in the California. gawd. |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1448 Posts
|
Monday, July 28, 2008 2:37:13 AM I'm going to stress this again: IT'S THE BOX, NOT THE CAR.Say, for example, I claimed to be able to summon tiny glowing pixies. I have a magic box that they can live in. This is my invention - it's an extension of the pixies' universe/plane of existence into our own. I show you an LCD televsion set with my magic box attached to the back and say that the light inside the TV comes from the tiny glowing pixies, rather than the usual flourescent tube. So,,,Telzenm Kissmark...would you consider that TV proof of my claim to have invented a magic box that allows the tiny glowing pixies to live in out universe? Without seeing the pixies or any evidence that they exist? That's like what you're doing when you say you've seen an electric car working and consider that proof that the Secret Technology Box inside it is doing what it's claimed to be doing even though there's no evidence that it is and plenty of evidence that it can't. The pixies are more believable. |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1448 Posts
|
Monday, July 28, 2008 2:25:08 AM Telzen, Kissmark: Right here, several people have explained in detail why this does not work as specified and why if it did work they wouldn't be trying to get a car company interested (they're *talking* about mass production - I can talk about mass producing my transporter beams too, but it means nothing).Would you two like to buy the White House? I'm selling it. I can show you a video proving it's real if you like. You two have seen an electric car running. No-one is denying that electric cars exist. You have not seen how their Secret Technology Electricity Making Box works, and that's their product. You are monumentally gullible. Please buy my house. Buy by the end of the week and get a free bridge! Next week, I sell the Eiffel Tower. The week after, Westminster Palace. Then a special auction on the Washington Monument. Send £1000 in any currency to get a ticket to the auction. |
|
Kissmark Male, 13-17, Asia
3 Posts
|
Monday, July 28, 2008 2:08:54 AM lol iv seen the water car run. ther only tryin to make japs look stupid when they cant find something better themselvs |
|
HOLYCRAP1234 Male, 13-17, Western US
   1462 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:31:10 PM TL;DR. |
|
Telzen Male, 18-29, Eastern US
22 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 10:19:01 PM So you are trying to say that the car they have video of driving is fake? Yeah I'm sure. They must have also fooled all those auto makers as well, since they are already talking about mass production. |
|
DorisDahmer Male, 13-17, Midwest US
   86 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 7:24:15 PM What if we created negative energy, so that we could run our cars on this, but the energy lost in the process would we would be losing negative energy, so that we would be gaining positive energy. Makes perfect sence. I learnd about it in Colladge. |
|
davymid Male, 18-29, Europe
   5553 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 7:15:22 PM (cont) I believe the phrase the cool kids use is *headdesk* |
|
davymid Male, 18-29, Europe
   5553 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 7:13:55 PM ^^ "So willing to jump on the bandwagon when it comes to believing in a 2 minute video that offers no real explanation for itself, and so reluctant to give an ear to any kind of science..."ecp, you have no idea... I'm a PhD geologist, and I have to deal with this kind of f*cking idiocy every day, hence my pissed-off rant on page 2. Example, ages ago there was a post on how continental drift was wrong and the earth was growing. http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=25828 You'd be amazed how many people jumped on the bandwagon with that video, despite the fact that it was made by a crackpot ex-comic book illustrator and cartoonist, who's decided to start playing science in his senile-dementia-ridden retirement. But where it really gets fun is in the frequent evolution vs creationism debates on here... I believe the phrase the cool kids us |
|
ecpkngt Female, 18-29, Western US
   87 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 7:04:12 PM Sigh. Did none of you bother to click on patthebaker's link? Here it is again. So willing to jump on the bandwagon when it comes to believing in a 2 minute video that offers no real explanation for itself, and so reluctant to give an ear to any kind of science...http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/06/... |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1448 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 6:57:15 PM Are you referring to the foreign words that have been amalgamated into English? voila, bravo and words like that?They aren't slang women. They aren't women at all. They are words. What's a slang woman, anyway? They're not slang, either. They're just words from one language that have become commoonly used in another language. No doubt there's a term for that, but I can't be bothered to look it up. English is particularly noted for it, having acquired many words from dozens of languages. |
|
basketkase Male, 13-17, Eastern US
   636 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 6:41:10 PM thanks for the European slang women |
|
davymid Male, 18-29, Europe
   5553 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 6:24:49 PM ^^ Eloquently put, Angilion. Bravo. |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1448 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 5:59:07 PM Alternatively, they could get big piles of cash from the Japanese government for solving Japan's electricity generating problems. Just put 10,000 of these boxes in a warehouse near the sea and voila! A non-polluting power station generating masses of electricity for hardly any money and requiring no fuel other than the seawater pumped in from yards away. Japan has a lot of coastline, seeing as it's some islands. So just build a couple of dozen of these power stations and stop importing electricity. The inventors instantly become national heroes and as rich as they want to be.Then they sell it to every country with a coast or a large river or a large lake, solving the world's energy problems, allegedly stop global warming, because worldwide heroes and the richest people on the planet. So yeah, of course they'd try to get a car company interested instead. No. It's drivel. It doesn't work. |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1448 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 5:53:07 PM Even if you (generic) have no understanding of chemistry at all, the economics should be enough to show you this is BS.Forget the car. That's just a standard car retrofitted with an electric motor. Nothing new. The key part is the Secret Technology Box that allegedly generates electricity from water alone, even highly impure water, without any pollution. The inventors of this wondrous device can't get any money for it, so they're trying to persuade a car company to buy into it in some way, and they're not succeeding. Drivel. If it worked as specified, they could just sell the boxes to people who would like to not have any electricty bills. Buy a box, get it hooked up somewhere in your home, disconnect yourself from the grid and use the box to provide all the electricity you could use, and more. Just fill a jug from the tap and pour it in every now and then. Or just pee in it, as that's mostly water and this device magics away anything in the water. |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1448 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 5:44:12 PM "Why does the "article" writer assumed the water powered engine works differently from any other kind of engine?Nobody is claming perpetual motion here, it's basics thermodynamics to know that the battery's energy will be drained the same way it is drained in a gasoline engine.. the question is not if you "do" lose energy in the process .. the question is how much .. " SageLudwig: The claim is that there isn't a battery in the car at all, that the electricity for the motor is generated by the Secret Technology box in the car. People *are* claiming that the box (not the engine - that isn't the important thing, it's just an electric motor) does work differently to anything else. They *are* claiming that it breaks the laws of thermodynamics and that it is a perpetual motion machine, although they don't know that they're doing so. |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1448 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 5:39:25 PM "If he was not done testing the engine then why the hell did he made a whole article on it?He just put the title in the form of a question and add the word "rubbish" and people throw cash at the guy. Wow." There is no engine to test. There is a PC-sized box that supposedly does the impossible. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, to suggest that is what actually happens. Genepax's claim would be more plausible if they claimed that it was alien technology or magic. Or if they provided any evidence at all that it works. What we've seen is a car powered by an electric motor - nothing new there. We appear to have probably seen a fuel cell generating the electricty - nothing new there, either. We might be seeing the fuel cell supplied with hydrogen by using a metal hydride and water - nothing new there, either. But that's not a water-powered car. It can't work in the way some people think it does. The article briefly explains why it can't work. |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1448 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 5:27:01 PM "Did no one read the article? I mean really read it? What the hell? It clearly said that a car that runs on only water is impossible, but an electrolysis engine added to a normal engine could increase efficiency by 300%. That means you would use water and 3 times less gas! Isn't this also great news? I'm gonna keep up with that guy's blog and see what the results are."cmanatlan: I also read the badly written section detailing the ludicrous claims made by people selling stuff to anyone gullible enough to buy it. However, I didn't mistake it for a statement of fact, as you did, in part because I read the whole article, including the paragraph after the paragraph you read, and in part because I have a basic understanding on what's involved and therefore know that it's impossible. You can reduce petrol consumption to a quarter, but only by fitting an extra engine of another type. |
|
SageLudwig Male, 18-29, S. America
18 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 5:25:04 PM Why does the "article" writer assumed the water powered engine works differently from any other kind of engine?Nobody is claming perpetual motion here, it's basics thermodynamics to know that the battery's energy will be drained the same way it is drained in a gasoline engine.. the question is not if you "do" lose energy in the process .. the question is how much .. And as far as that goes, nobody here can proof OR disproof that the water engine WORKS .. the same way a fuel engine do, within the thermodynamics law. I really don't understand why he is "proposing" outwise, no engine works the way he is trying to disproof this does.. >_> |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   1448 Posts
|
Sunday, July 27, 2008 5:18:20 PM "But why would someone waste time trying to disprove it, when they could use the same amount of time, trying to find a better way for it to work?"Nidonemo: You have, probably unknowingly, stated that someone can fundamentally change the way the universe works in the same amount it takes to write a short article. Because that is what is required to make this work in the way that gullible people think it works - a fundamental change to the way the universe works. You may as well ask why someone doesn't spend half an hour building a magic box from cardboard and string that contains an endless supply of whatever food and drink they want. It isn't a waste of time to warn people that they are being mislead. |
|
Page: 1 2 3 Next >
|
|