1williamsg Male, 18-29, Europe
   289 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:29:23 AM random button brings up a super cool old gem of a post |
|
AntiHero94 Female, 13-17, Western US
  66 Posts
|
Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:03:19 PM holy shyte that was brilliant |
|
itsdrew Male, 13-17, Southern US
   1110 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:03:38 PM that, was tight. |
|
alice_x Female, 18-29, Europe
   5227 Posts
|
Monday, July 14, 2008 2:03:08 AM lmfao Polish_Lacey |
|
Nazarene Male, 50-59, Midwest US
   187 Posts
|
Thursday, July 10, 2008 10:21:17 PM How did this "primordial soup" come to have a multitude of different amino acids waiting around to make a cell? |
|
davymid Male, 18-29, Europe
   5553 Posts
|
Thursday, July 10, 2008 7:05:37 PM ^^ Catbarf, blackbum fleeced your avatar! |
|
Overmann Male, 18-29, Southern US
   3145 Posts
|
Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:22:49 PM "...evidence doesn't mean proof as something can have no evidence and still be true."Except that in your 360 layup example, evidence does exist but it's only available to you. It is true to you because you witnessed it, but as far as everyone else is concerned, it didn't happen. This analogy doesn't carry over to the existence of God, because evidence of a god is available to no one and therefore no one can justifiably regard it as truth in that light. |
|
Ghostofme16 Female, 18-29, Eastern US
   156 Posts
|
Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:45:31 PM drating idiots Monkeys didnt give birth to humans, they slowly changed over THOUSANDS of year Its not like it can just decide in the wound that it will change...Like flying fish... a fish didnt just give birth to one that could fly. Their bodies slowly evolved like that so they could survive by catching food above water... |
|
blackbum4me Male, 18-29, Europe
 29 Posts
|
Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:44:31 PM i liked the last sentence alot "human stand on ONE branch but now we effect the future of every branch of this 400 billion yeard old tree"think about it , peace out |
|
RzrBlade Male, 13-17, Europe
24 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 6:50:18 PM ...wonder what life would be like if other 'species' of humans didnt die out....? We would be the smart ones , and then there would be some super strength ppl living next door.And id love to know what we will evole into in another 400 million years......if we dont die out that is. |
|
Tetramino Male, 13-17, Midwest US
  68 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 4:14:13 PM Carl Sagan was a genius. I loved watching Cosmos when it was on the science channel. He's an excellent writer, too. I kinda like his voice, it sounds smart, heh. |
|
Turnshroud Female, 18-29, Midwest US
   5353 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 1:41:49 PM What I want to know is,where the hell did the idea iof an ape giving birth to a human vcome from? Seriopusly, what you have to know is that these were all steps, like miutations. Some guy didn't just come along and go, HUMANS CAME FROM MONKETS!! And also, monkeys have tails, apes don't. |
|
gorgack2000 Male, 13-17, Europe
   2426 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 1:12:30 PM Fish didn't evolve directly from polyps; There was a stage in between that... |
|
Triskele Female, 18-29, Eastern US
   215 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 1:07:53 PM Lies! This is how evolution really came about: One retarded fish-monkey came out of the water and had buttsex with another retarded fish-monkey, then they had more retarded fish-monkeys, which freakishly evolved into retarded monkey-humans. Learn to watch South Park instead of the insidious lies the Discovery Channel tells you. |
|
billcosby Male, 18-29, Western US
 49 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:53:17 AM Human plantaris muscle versus primate plantaris muscle. In humans it is vestigial. If you cut it in half, there would be no effect on our walking ability. But primates need it to climb. If we didn't evolve from a common ancestor why would an Intelligent Designer even bother to put that in our bodies? Same with our auricular muscles. |
|
Turnshroud Female, 18-29, Midwest US
   5353 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:44:31 AM malerie and sickle cells? Evolutrion Adapting to higher altidtude? Evolution Skin color? EvolutionYou want to go in deph and posgts nicelosg posts primetimekin? |
|
gorgokid333 Male, 13-17, Western US
   228 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:43:25 AM I dont agree with a bit of it, and I dont feel like argueing. but it was still a cool looking vid |
|
gerdoggie Male, 30-39, Midwest US
6 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:41:42 AM The only problem we have now with human evolution is how slow it is going to happen. We care for the weak, sick, and dumb and keep them alive to breed more of the same. In nature these individuals die off leaving a stronger breed. With humans the gene pool is getting weaker instead of stronger. |
|
catbarf Male, 13-17, Eastern US
   1157 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 7:38:17 AM Kairobert, it would generally help if you had the attention span to read to the end of his post. |
|
kairobert Male, 13-17, Europe
   1149 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 6:46:19 AM Lol he should have explained how the actual evolution happens through mutation and natural selection. Some lesser minds think that we think dinosaurs actually "suddenly gave birth to birds", like this example here:"THIS IS STUPID! HOW CAN A MONKEY GIVE BURTH TO A HUMAN? HUH DUMBASSES? I DONT SEE BIRDS GIVING BIRTH TO ALIGATORS DO YOU?" Note the ALL CAPS, a definite sign of the inability to use intellectual argumentation to overrule the primal instinct of anger. This may because there may be no valid intellectual argument to prove creationism. |
|
REBELComx Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   441 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 6:21:11 AM Now, Taroku...just because there's nothing to support it, doesn't mean it would die off quickly...that's why we still have Creationism. Hell, that's why we have religion of any kind. |
|
Taroku Male, 18-29, Canada
14 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 6:02:55 AM Yep all those creationists are right, we scientists have totally sold out to the theory of evolution... Why? Because it is currently the most supported theory in all of science as of right now. The amounts of evidence both physical and circumstantial is overwhelming (Not actually as it all supports evolution). You have to remember when Darwin first proposed the theory the science world was totally against it, until they looked at it properly and looked at the evidence and then looked around them and realized, "Hey, this guy is correct." The Theory of Evolutions would have died a long time if it was not supported, that's how science works. Being that it is around, those who are against it should stop claiming that the evidence doesn't support it, because it does. |
|
JJRed88 Male, 18-29, Midwest US
   156 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 3:31:52 AM Another thing there are a handful of theories that state that even if you manage to go back in time you would be unable to change the past. |
|
JJRed88 Male, 18-29, Midwest US
   156 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 3:27:07 AM What I find most interesting about this debate is that while a handful of Evolutionists have evidence, most of them are just hurling insults at the Creationists. I would think if you actually understood your position you wouldn't be so insecure as to have to sling mud at your opponents, don't we see enough of that in the politics? |
|
duffytoler Male, 40-49, Midwest US
   1013 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 1:41:30 AM The biggest problem with evolution was when computers evolved to be so simple to use that creationists could log on. |
|