I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
LatestPopularMost BookmarkedMost EmailedTop RatedMy FavoritesRandomChat
AllGamesFunnyEntertainmentQuizzesWeirdTechLifestyle, Arts & Lit.News & PoliticsScienceSportsMisc
Submit Content  


friendsmore friends | add your site

Gorilla Mask


Funny Games

FreeGame Heaven

Quiz Stop

123 Games

Not Healthy

Funny Stuff

Nothing To Do?

Free Samples

Back to Listing

DUI Checkpoint - Drug Dogs And Searches

Hits: 5527 | Rating: (3.1) | Category: Weird | Added by: 12chars
Page: 1 2 Next >   Jump to: Bottom    Last Post
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 1594 Posts
Friday, July 12, 2013 4:43:14 PM
yeah, kids fault for being a jackass

Male, 40-49, Western US
 27 Posts
Friday, July 12, 2013 1:23:22 PM
Nice to see that he set the whole thing up so that he could get youtube famous! and it seem to have worked.

It is pretty simple, I'm not a cop but if you act suspicious around me I'm going to treat you with suspicion. I stopped coming to this site because most of the commenters are just plain retarded, your the same bunch of dippoos who are screaming for more gun control, but i shouldn't have to roll my window down at a sobriety check point.

I seem to remember way back when I was first getting me license, one of the first things I was told is that driving on publicly maintained roads was a privilege not right, and because there so many asshats out there who can't fallow a few simple rules like.

1) Have a valid license.
2) Have valid registration and insurance.
3) Don't drive impaired.
we have to have check points in the hopes that we can get a few of them off of the road. There is a time and a place to fight "the man" i don't believe t

Male, 30-39, Canada
 660 Posts
Friday, July 12, 2013 12:39:11 PM
I'm a little curious about some of you folks reactions to this.

It it not wrong to know your rights, and exercise your rights. In fact it is your duty as a citizen to uphold your rights. If the constitution says you cannot be subject to unreasonable search and seizure then you cannot be subjected to it, plain and simple.

I cannot see why the driver is being vilified for insisting that the police adhere to his rights. Why would you give them up? Men and women have fought and died to insure that you are protected from abuse of authority.

The officer could have done his job properly speaking through opening in the window. Can anyone honestly say they believe that the situation would have transpired in exactly the same way if he had given up his rights and complied with the officer's demands? The actions of the police were punitive and an abuse of power.

Male, 30-39, Western US
 1505 Posts
Tuesday, July 09, 2013 9:50:55 AM
I'm appalled at the ignorant comments here on IAB. Most people don't know their rights and/or give them away so freely. If I'm ever stopped at a checkpoint, I'll do the same as this guy. It's my duty to uphold my rights. If everyone did, we wouldn't have these problems.
You are not required (without suspicion of a crime/violation) to:
-roll down your window all the way
-pull over
-get out
-give your age
-give your license
-consent to search

They wouldn't even answer his question if he was being detained or not. That's bullpoo.
Also, the root of the problem is this failed drug war. It should be stopped.

Male, 30-39, Western US
 1505 Posts
Tuesday, July 09, 2013 9:38:14 AM
Who was being the biggest butthole? The officer of course. The driver did nothing wrong. I hope they are all fired and he wins a big lawsuit.

Male, 60-69, Western US
 227 Posts
Monday, July 08, 2013 7:53:16 PM
Most likely the whole thing could have ended if the non-nice individual had just rolled down his window. Cops are dicks -- not just these, but all cops after a few years on the job. But he aggravated a guy who was probably on some kind of punishment duty.

Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 2825 Posts
Monday, July 08, 2013 7:26:48 AM
Doesn't matter MCthslpnts. Where do people draw the line? Listen I'm all for stopping drunk drivers but when they purposely abuse their positions, for instance the dog giving a false positive on the Drug. The officer definitely "led" the dog on. That's some petty bs. Just look at my posts I'm pretty left leading on most things and even I find this troubling. First off it gives the right wing nuts ammo to spout out about big brother. This type of poo shouldn't happen. Regardless if they don't catch a drunk driver every now and then.

Female, 30-39, Canada
 2427 Posts
Monday, July 08, 2013 6:07:28 AM
These videos of Americans fighting cops about their constitutional rights (whether in cars or in their homes) always makes me wonder: have all of them forgotten about the Patriot Act? It makes me sad that Canada has instituted our version of the same document, too. The cops don't need warrants any more, they need no reason for anything they do now, they can do whatever the f*ck they want to whomever the f*ck they want... the Patriot Act (and our Canadian version too) has pissed on our so-called rights and thrown them right out the window.
Now we get to have fun dealing with the repercussions that thankfully these people are nice enough to videotape and post for us. (end of rant)...
the driver DID seem like a dick and SEEMED to be asking for trouble for no good reason. Maybe the cop shouldn't have lost his cool but I bet it wasn't easy to not freak out at the kid.

Male, 40-49, Europe
 13316 Posts
Monday, July 08, 2013 2:04:49 AM
Thanking the lord Im in Britain
the law here for such things like that is gentlemanly

Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 428 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 4:38:20 PM
randy. As you can clearly see. The officer is using the fact that he is an officer to not only ignore a lawful question, but also to intimidate a driver to get out of his car, without cause, without consent, without warrant. You make me sick. supposed "DUI" checkpoints constitute a violation of Unreasonable Searches and Seizure. You can't simply PULL EVERYONE OVER that's going down a particular street. Furthermore, It's obviously not a dui checkpoint because they have drug sniffing dogs doing open air searches. Dogs cannot and will never be able to determine whether or not a person is under the influence. Police are sworn to protect and to server, Not to look around and act on hunches. You make me sick.

Male, 40-49, Midwest US
 189 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 2:01:38 PM
Poke the bear, see what happens. We have our freedoms in this country because they were earned. Little punks like this that want to challenge authority at every turn are not the ones that earned us these freedoms. They are the ones we need to protect...from themselves.
This is not a 'roadblock' this is a road side safety checkpoint. The purpose is to deter and eliminate drunk drivers. Police officers do not need this type of attitude and harassment, that's what makes some cops become jaded and abuse their post.

Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 6560 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 10:03:02 AM
that kid did a great editing job. I'm amazed at how many people actually believed the cop admitted the kid was innocent. But I guess people will believe anything.

Male, 18-29, Europe
 1192 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 9:38:10 AM
It doesn't matter if the driver was a jerk, he was within his rights. You Americans can't even follow your own laws.

Male, 60-69, Eastern US
 4525 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 7:36:57 AM
Wow. That escalated quickly!
I see your point and I'm not entirely opposed to it but I think it's more like, "I'd rather see an innocent man questioned than have a murderer out on the street."

Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 2584 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 7:22:17 AM
Even while evidence against the cop piles on, he'll never need to answer for his actions.

patchouly: I assume you're the catcher most days..

Male, 30-39, Western US
 362 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 7:03:22 AM
The cop even said "The kids knows his constitutional rights" So he violated them knowingly and willingly. The cop should be fired for that fact alone. Why are people so willing to give away their rights? Once they are gone, you will not get them back...think about your kids!! Do you want them living in that world?

Male, 18-29, Canada
 506 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 6:06:13 AM
@patchouly "I'd rather have a guy unnecessarily searched then have a drunk driving around on the road."

And where does that end? With "I'd rather have an innocent man go to jail for life than have murderer out on the street..." Slippery slope.

Male, 40-49, Canada
 4704 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 5:31:29 AM
He acted suspicious, right from the beginning. Not rolling down his window? Why? It's either a way to provoke the cops or he's hiding something. We know which it was, but the cops don't.

I'd rather have a guy unnecessarily searched then have a drunk driving around on the road. If something in the situation doesn't seem right, you check it out. I've been though check points many times. They ask how I'm doing. They ask if I've been drinking and then they send me on my way. Only takes a few seconds. This guys mistake was being an idiot and not rolling the window down which sent all sorts of red flags to the cops. Make no mistake, he did this on purpose so he could film it.

Male, 60-69, Eastern US
 4525 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 4:05:25 AM
I doubt he'd go to jail but, if he did, I especially doubt he'd get a ring!

Male, 30-39, Europe
 40 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 3:21:12 AM
The police officer hit the nail on the head when he said the kid was completely innocent and knew his rights. He had no reason to blow his lid except to be a total douchebag on a powertrip.
The kid wasn't rude, his tone was neutral and he was calm. The first thing the officer should have done was tell him the reason for stopping the car.

Male, 50-59, Southern US
 488 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 3:05:59 AM
Cops: Wrong. Kid: Technically correct. That and a dollar will get you a wedding ring when your punk azz goes to jail and Bubba thinks you're cute. There is a time to be right and a time to STFU. This kid eventually will come up against Office Clyde and he will go to jail, he will be butt raped, and he will win a lawsuit. Is you anal virginity worth being right ALL the time.

Male, 30-39, Europe
 645 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 2:11:52 AM
Hate this. Driver is a complete jerk. @Runemang is totally correct. He knew the cops were checking for DIU, so why act like you're hiding something? They're bound to think you're drunk. Idiot. Stop wasting time by being a smartass little kid and help them do their job.

Male, 50-59, Southern US
 2572 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 1:02:04 AM
"You are required to carry and to present ID at all times, even if you're not driving."

Wrong! But that is certainly what they're brainwashing the sheeple to believe.

Female, 50-59, Canada
 6406 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 12:50:00 AM
DromEd: I don't usually bother to say things like this, but your comment was idiotic. Go get drunk and drive into a tree.

Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 183 Posts
Sunday, July 07, 2013 12:00:52 AM

"Also, yes, you ARE required to provide ID when asked. You are required to carry and to present ID at all times, even if you're not driving."

In his state? In mine you aren't. Unless you've been suspected of a crime with reasonable suspicion and are being detained, you are not required to present ID. Unless driving. Even then, a traffic stop requires reasonable suspicion of a crime.

Page: 1 2 Next > 

You Must be Signed in to Add a Comment

If you've already got an I-Am-Bored.com account,
click here to sign in.

If you don't have an account yet,
Click Here to Create a Free Account

Back to Listing ^top

Bored | Suggest a Link | Advertise | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |