I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
LatestPopularMost BookmarkedMost EmailedTop RatedMy FavoritesRandomChat
AllGamesFunnyEntertainmentQuizzesWeirdTechLifestyle, Arts & Lit.News & PoliticsScienceSportsMisc
Submit Content  





rss

friendsmore friends | add your site
Asylum

Holy Taco

Funny Videos

BuzzFeed

NothingToxic

Oddee

Mousebreaker

Online Games

Eat Liver

Online Games

Gorilla Mask

Full Downloads

Norway Games

Damn Cool Pics

Kontraband

Extreme Humor

X Hollywood

I Dont Like You

123 Games

Hollywoodtuna

Funny Games

Cool Stuff

Viva La Games

X - Vids

Smit Happens

Funny Videos

Funny Stuff

ebaumsworld



Back to Listing

Why Does Congress Suck?

Hits: 8752 | Rating: (2.1) | Category: News & Politics | Added by: Squrlz4Sale
Page: 1 2 Next >   Jump to: Bottom    Last Post
McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 13145 Posts
Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:51:16 AM
Why does Congress suck?


Politicians.

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 12955 Posts
Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:59:12 PM
(next day) I didn't think so.

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 12955 Posts
Monday, February 18, 2013 8:24:40 PM
What it boils down to is who is willing to compromise. The Democrats have shown time and again that they are.

Thanks, Smaggy! That's the best laugh I've had all month!

Now, let's see if you can name one thing on which the Democrats have compromised -- just ONE!

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 12955 Posts
Monday, February 18, 2013 8:16:25 PM
Hope's not dead yet brotha. We might get a surprise like Sandra Day O'Connor (or in this case a possibly leftist judge who actually turns out to be the opposite).

That would be a first. Since the Dems smeared and slandered Robert Bork, Republican presidents (the Bushs) have only nominated squishy moderates (with the singular exception of Alito), while Democrats only nominate hard-core leftists. Our nominees tend to turn their coats (Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Kennedy, Roberts) while theirs never do.

If you're hoping for Sotomayor or Kagan suddenly to find a new respect for the constitution, I'm afraid you're going to be sadly disappointed.

Cajun247
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 10210 Posts
Monday, February 18, 2013 7:20:08 PM
That's the point Crakr, there is no way we can 100% guarantee everyone in the US equal voting power. As I've already said that map would have to be updated every ten years meaning we wouldn't really have a federal republic.

SmagBoy1
Male, 40-49, Southern US
 4046 Posts
Monday, February 18, 2013 11:53:43 AM
AJ, the fact that you can't understand why people blame Republicans more than Democrats for the economy and deadlock in Congress doesn't mean that it's difficult to understand. I mean, even FOXNews polls indicate as much (see: here).

What it boils down to is who is willing to compromise. The Democrats have shown time and again that they are. Same can't be said for the Republicans. At all. So, ergo-waffle-oh, whose fault is it?

auburnjunky
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 9877 Posts
Monday, February 18, 2013 11:15:33 AM
I think it's funny that people still blame the Republicans for this mess.

Why pass something that the President has openly said he would veto? Why vote on something the Senate has openly said don't bother?

It's the Democrats that don't want to move forward.

CrakrJak
Male, 40-49, Midwest US
 16729 Posts
Monday, February 18, 2013 7:12:59 AM
Cajun: The problem with your map is that it doesn't follow state lines. The states would never allow their borders to be redrawn like that.

I do believe that congressional districts should follow existing county lines (within each state) and should more or less be squareish in shape. Exceptions to that rule would be natural barriers like lakes, rivers and mountain ranges.

Cajun247
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 10210 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 9:13:50 PM
Democrat-appointed leftist Supreme Court justices for the rest of their lives.


Hope's not dead yet brotha. We might get a surprise like Sandra Day O'Connor (or in this case a possibly leftist judge who actually turns out to be the opposite).

Cajun247
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 10210 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 9:11:59 PM
Of course that map would have to be updated EVERY TEN FU<KING YEARS!

Cajun247
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 10210 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 9:10:00 PM
Their Pages and Interns do, but not Congress itself.


Oh no you di'nt!

Cajun247
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 10210 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 9:08:44 PM

Gerry1of1
Male, 50-59, Western US
 33895 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 8:29:05 PM

Congress doesn't suck.
Their Pages and Interns do, but not Congress itself.

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 12955 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 8:08:18 PM
Now while that may support your worldview, certainly you can't think it is right, fair, or appropriate.

Why not? The Democrats did it to us for over 40 years. I say, turnabout's fair play.

Congressional districts are usually drawn by state legislatures. Whichever party wins a majority in that state gets to draw the districts to their party's advantage. This is just another example of the old saying, "elections have consequences."

Besides, I'd rather have to live with Democrat-drawn house districts for 10 years than live with Democrat-appointed leftist Supreme Court justices for the rest of their lives.

HolyGod
Male, 30-39, Western US
 4818 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 3:47:47 PM
FYI, in case anyone wants to know what happens because of gerrymandering, in the 2012 election all congressional seats were up for election. Democrats received more votes than republicans nationally, however republicans got 234 people elected and democrats got 201 people elected.

Now while that may support your worldview, certainly you can't think it is right, fair, or appropriate.

HolyGod
Male, 30-39, Western US
 4818 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 3:27:43 PM
OldOllie

"Gerrymandering is only bad when the other side does it."

I disagree. While I don't consider myself cemented to either side, I'm sure you view me as a hardline liberal. I would be pissed off if democrats did this, and I know they do.

Congressional districts should be drawn simply and easily and without any human input whatsoever. Run a computer program that equally divides your state into districts as close to square or uniform as possible, taking into account only population without regard for demographics.

Does that not work for some reason?

5Cats
Male, 50-59, Canada
 24148 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 2:47:24 PM
@OldOllie: Well that's true, it CAN alter the balance, which is why it's done in the first place!
Over time it sort-of "evens out" somewhat.
You'd need to "jiggle the lines" nearly every election to keep one side or the other out. Oh, that's what they do isn't it...

I think this guy's point is that both parties are filled with "party-loyal" politicians, and not politicians who have to answer to the general public.

Gerrymandering Explained On IAB! Fun fun information!

Interesting Article About it

SmagBoy1
Male, 40-49, Southern US
 4046 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 2:35:21 PM
I'm not trying to pick a fight, but, actually, gerrymandering *can* significantly affect the balance. Districts are drawn on population, not eligible voters. At all. Prisoners, who can't vote, for example, count. Etc. And there are plenty of clever people out there on both parties who take full advantage or populations who can't/don't vote, yet who count against head count.

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 12955 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 2:27:58 PM
Gerrymandering is only bad when the other side does it.

BTW, if you don't think gerrymandering can significantly affect the balance of a state's congressional delegation, you don't understand the concept.

5Cats
Male, 50-59, Canada
 24148 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 2:03:23 PM
@QueenZira: You seem to have forgotten that lumping voters from one side into an area ALSO lumps voters from the other side into THEIR area too!
It's very difficult to gerrymander for the benifit of only one party, over the long haul. Sure you might change a seat or two through this sort of cheating, but you'll also GIVE UP a seat or two as well.

So BOTH parties cheat because it makes their lives easier! They don't need to represent the people, they have "landslide seats"!

Thus some political boot-licker (Jessee Jackson, both Sr AND Jr) can be rewarded with his very own seat in the house. No actual skills required! Other than ass-kissing & money...

SmagBoy1
Male, 40-49, Southern US
 4046 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 1:36:44 PM
The way I see it is that a bipartisan panel of mathematicians could fix this. It's not that gerrymandering is good for one party and not the other, it's that it's good for the party in power at the time of drawing the districts. And that just amplifies problems. If you want to want to actually represent the "whole" population, you have to have candidates who are more moderate. I don't mean liberal, I mean ones who are closer to the center, from both sides. The only way to get that, to get representatives who can convince the most people to vote for them from both sides is to do away with this rigging. And I'm speaking about it from the perspective of both parties. Even though I'm a screaming, tree-hugging liberal, I recognize that Dems are just as guilty of this. It needs to be fixed.

QueenZira
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
 2181 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 12:56:17 PM
Andy- if the shoe fits.


As for the rest of your clap trap, squeeze that tinfoil on tight there junior.

Andrew155
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 2564 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 12:46:29 PM
No, the vra is responsible for what is called Affirmative gerrymandering. This is well known fact. But now you're basically calling me a racist which means I'm done with you, you can't be reached.

Just remember, democrats live more densely, this means that they will be more concentrated in even the most square of districts. So if you have 100 people and 10 districts, you'll see a lot of democrat districts that have 8-9 democrats. This means the republicans would have more even if they have equal numbers. It's simple math. And most importantly, this would be true with square district.

Don't call me racist. It's weird.

Gerry1of1
Male, 50-59, Western US
 33895 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 12:27:04 PM

I wanna change my last name to "Mandering"

QueenZira
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
 2181 Posts
Sunday, February 17, 2013 12:15:01 PM
The VRA has nothing whatsoever to do with Gerrymandering, unless of course you're prepared to argue that minorities having the unimpeded right to vote makes it harder for Southerners to draw all white districts.

Districts are not drawn to advantage becuase of "more spread outness," They're drawn according to more beneficial populations.

You really didn't see the vid did you?

Page: 1 2 Next > 

You Must be Signed in to Add a Comment

If you've already got an I-Am-Bored.com account,
click here to sign in.

If you don't have an account yet,
Click Here to Create a Free Account
 

Back to Listing ^top


Bored | Suggest a Link | Advertise | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.