 darkmagic14n
Male, 18-29, Western US
 1634 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:53:24 PM
@Reignblazer. I'm willing to bet a rival gang member is more of a target than the Obama children. A gang leader is more of a target, in the US, than POTUS.
More important? No. Higher profile target? Yes. |
|
 unmercyfuldu
Male, 18-29, Western US
731 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:47:13 PM
I am sure the president would love to lead a country that he doesn't fear harbors people who want to kill his children. |
|
unmercyfuldu
Male, 18-29, Western US
731 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:44:45 PM
Yeah! Where is my personal secret service. And my fleet of jets and helicopters... and gigantic white house.... and... Wait... maybe we shouldn't compare the president's life to our own lives. It just might be a little different and necessitate some perks. |
|
 sparki1980
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
293 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:42:31 PM
Ofcourse this fails to land truthfully since one of the executive actions Obama is pushing that does not require congressional approval is: to "Provide law enforcement, first responders, and school officials with proper
training for active shooter situations."
and another is "Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers."
Wasn't there a video yesterday about an armed SRO, seems he wants that? Kind of untruthful of the NRA to say he's against armed guards at schools.. |
|
 MeGrendel
Male, 40-49, Southern US
2339 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:38:16 PM
Reignblazer-"More important? No. More likely a target? Yes."
So? That's just odds. Why should the peons' children be refused protection just because it's 'less likely'?
If armed guards make his children safer, he can not claim that armed guards in every school would make them 'less safe'.
|
|
 tatripp
Male, 18-29, Western US
1182 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:27:52 PM
I agree with Gerry on this one. I am also pro gun ownership but this ad is pretty dumb. |
|
 Reignblazer
Male, 18-29, Europe
1559 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:26:59 PM
"ARE Obama's kids more important than mine?"
More important? No. More likely a target? Yes. |
|
 McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
10257 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:25:49 PM
Do as I say not as I do. If guns are the problem why are the politicians surrounded by "military style assault weapons?" |
|
 McThstlpnts
Female, 18-29, Southern US
685 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:24:32 PM
@Gerry1of1 Agreed. |
|
MeGrendel
Male, 40-49, Southern US
2339 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:23:53 PM
ARE Obama's kids more important than mine?
If he is so against armed guards at school, he needs to set an example and lead the way.
Until he does, he's spouting bull. |
|
Reignblazer
Male, 18-29, Europe
1559 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:18:19 PM
Hah!
While this commercial is completely retarded, the gun-toting cat has long since come out of the kevlar bag. |
|
BoredFrank
Male, 40-49, Southern US
1318 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:16:40 PM
They is ah tryin' to take our GUNZ! Derp! |
|
 Gerry1of1
Male, 50-59, Western US
25694 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:08:46 PM
I am on the record as being pro-gun ownership.
But that is one of the dumbest ads ever. |
|
McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
10257 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:01:25 PM
Truth hurts. |
|
 fancylad
Male, 30-39, Western US
2512 Posts
|
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:47:20 AM
Link: The NRA Just Released A New Commercial [Rate Link] - Yep, you bet they go after Obama. |
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}