I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
LatestPopularMost BookmarkedMost EmailedTop RatedMy FavoritesRandomChat
AllGamesFunnyEntertainmentQuizzesWeirdTechLifestyle, Arts & Lit.News & PoliticsScienceSportsMisc
Submit Content  





rss

friendsmore friends | add your site
Asylum

Holy Taco

Funny Videos

BuzzFeed

NothingToxic

Oddee

Mousebreaker

Online Games

Eat Liver

Online Games

Gorilla Mask

Full Downloads

Norway Games

Damn Cool Pics

Kontraband

Extreme Humor

X Hollywood

I Dont Like You

123 Games

Hollywoodtuna

Funny Games

Cool Stuff

Viva La Games

X - Vids

Smit Happens

Funny Videos

Funny Stuff

ebaumsworld



Back to Listing

Young Prodigies Dazzle The Art World

Hits: 8225 | Rating: (2.8) | Category: Arts & Literature | Added by: fancylad
Page: 1 2 Next >   Jump to: Bottom    Last Post
New_Guy
Male, 30-39, Europe
 401 Posts
Friday, January 18, 2013 5:41:05 AM
@SPrinkZ you would be talented if you where not breathing... go ahead give it a try.

M4A1
Male, 18-29, Western US
 29 Posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:29:35 PM
Meh, I could paint that good if I wanted to.I just don't have time.

r66tramp
Male, 40-49, Canada
 678 Posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:19:17 PM
SPrinkZ, that prick did not die poor! He was doing cocaine and pounding back bottles of wine like no tomorrow when his ticker stopped ticking.
Bla bla bla...Dude, you know jack!

emmettyville
Female, 40-49, Australia
 4267 Posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013 4:55:26 PM
horrible s hit. i've seen elephants who paint better.

SPrinkZ
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 2254 Posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:30:29 AM
He's talented the same way* sorry lol

SPrinkZ
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 2254 Posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:30:03 AM
Pollock gave art a place to go the same way that my toilet gives a place for my **** to go. He's not talented the same way that I'm talented for breathing.

I've heard a lot of contradictory stuff about Picasso. I've heard he had to burn his paintings to keep his house warm. But, I guess I could be wrong.

klaxor
Male, 18-29, Western US
 647 Posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:31:45 AM
"Pollock was crap. Piccasso is something to be in awe of...he was a true artist. He lived for it, and died a poor man and now we revere him. "

- Y'all need some art lessons. Picasso was incredibly successful, even when he was young. Other artists joked with him b/c of how much money he made from his art. He may have dressed like poor man, but he sure as hell wasn't poor

Pollock came into being at a time when photography had finally become reliable. People could take photos, cheaply and quickly, and so didn't need to spend money on sitting for hours for a painting. Pollock's work gave painting a new place to go, that photography couldn't follow.

I think these girls are okay, but not worth what people are paying. They still have a ways to go.

SPrinkZ
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 2254 Posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:56:22 AM
@Ollie

You at least grasp what art is truly about. An intentionality--a story--a message--that is all wrapped up in every color, shape, size, and face...etc.

The entire thing is a system that can be explored over and over and over again. These girls are little more than crap. Sucks they are being told they are so clever just because they can push a paint brush around.

SPrinkZ
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 2254 Posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:53:54 AM
I know it sounds like I'm being a hater, and I am. I don't think they deserve multiple thousands of dollars because they can paint. I believe they deserve it if they fix something, or help someone, or do something that changes the world--not just makes someone think for a moment or two about how a 14 year old could paint that.

SPrinkZ
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 2254 Posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:53:07 AM
Pollock was crap. Piccasso is something to be in awe of...he was a true artist. He lived for it, and died a poor man and now we revere him.

These girls are just putting pretty colors and shapes on a canvas and we freak out because it looks nice. Who cares?

I want to see the 'prodigy' that can make a jet-engine when they come out of the womb, or starts building a new type of capacitor. It's not impressive to be able to use sound or visual means to create. All 'art' prodigies are just lucky. They aren't truly talented in the way that others are who develop their skills. If I was born with an innate ability to transcribe what I see in my head I could be a great artist too--but I have a disconnect between what I want to draw and how it appears via my hand. It's a talent the same way that having two hands is a talent. They just have an extra "something" but it won't cure world hunger or fix much. They just are getting ridiculous money for a talking piece.

SoCal
Male, 18-29, Western US
 651 Posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:13:14 AM
"When i was around kids my own age sometimes I felt a bit like kind of alien." 4:55.

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 14431 Posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:03:51 AM
@r66, I meant to say I didn't much care for Picasso's impressionistic works, but I certainly appreciate that he was a master of his medium who was able to put on canvas exactly what he intended.

Pollock, on the other hand, was a no-talent hack who randomly slopped mass quantities of paint onto a canvas, and managed to convince a bunch of self-important f***tards that it was art. His crap is virtually indistinguishable from "art" created by elephants.

http://tinyurl.com/cv696p

r66tramp
Male, 40-49, Canada
 678 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:42:18 PM
Ollie, did you just put down Pollock and Picasso? OMG! That is pure nuts man! Art is each to own and those two dudes came up to the top of the table in the past 100 years. For you Ollie to discount that...well, you discount yourself! Pollock most can do away with, understandable as he had a limited display of limited selection and scope over a relative short period(made him very collectable), but Picasso was a renaissance man beyond belief! To put Picasso down as a painter is not to be understanding of any art. He rolled it all in there. You need to get back to school bro! Picasso gave birth to many other famous painters/sculptors! Even Rick Mastersthinks yer a dick!

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 14431 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:51:56 PM
oh, and they're not even good for their ages either. The 14 year old's skill is on par with a "good" 10 year old artist.

..says the 18-29 year old who can't even figure out how to delete a double post.

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 14431 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:47:57 PM
they should be able to prove they can paint, rather than just throw some poo up on a canvas and call it art

I've said this myself many times before. The most basic requirement of art is that it must be deliberate. I'm not a fan of Picasso, but he proved what he did was deliberate, not like, for instance, that fraudulent hack Jackson Pollock.

They're both good, but Victoria has gone a lot farther to prove her mastery of the medium than has Zoe.
I think

bacon_pie
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 2819 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:06:34 PM
Real artwork


Enjin
Male, 30-39, Asia
 790 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 8:43:32 PM
Hilarious.

r66tramp
Male, 40-49, Canada
 678 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:20:10 PM
botfly is not far off, I tip my hat to you. turdburglar was way out there on that one. I'm thinking 'Pedo' on that bro! Can-o-worms! Not good 4 nobody

ledzeppeloyd
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 2304 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 3:59:00 PM
the thing about art is that it is subjective, i mean i respect picasso because this is picasso but this too is him, they should be able to prove they can paint, rather than just throw some poo up on a canvas and call it art

skullgrin
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 915 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 3:17:04 PM
oh, and they're not even good for their ages either. The 14 year old's skill is on par with a "good" 10 year old artist.

skullgrin
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 915 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 2:54:16 PM
oh, and they're not even good for their ages either. The 14 year old's skill is on par with a "good" 10 year old artist.

skullgrin
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 915 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 2:51:49 PM
these girls are horrible lol. I cant believe people pay what they do for their work.

uunxx
Male, 30-39, Europe
 120 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:17:29 PM
It's all nothing new, a person with basic knowledge of arts can easily find all the inspirations. Neither these paintings are great technically. Sure they are good for 14 and the girls may be great in future but calling them genius is not a favour. Why should you learn anything when you are already genius? Actually there's a lot to learn.

Evil_Eye
Male, 18-29, Europe
 1451 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:13:42 PM
@turdburglar

botfly
Male, 50-59, Eastern US
 616 Posts
Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:11:39 PM
Cute kids. I would like to show them how a real man paints. Starting with painting their tonsils white.

Just kidding. HA!


Please ban this a$$hole, Pedo hammer style.




Page: 1 2 Next > 

You Must be Signed in to Add a Comment

If you've already got an I-Am-Bored.com account,
click here to sign in.

If you don't have an account yet,
Click Here to Create a Free Account
 

Back to Listing ^top


Bored | Suggest a Link | Advertise | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.