|Jump to: Bottom Last Post
Male, 13-17, Asia
|Sunday, December 30, 2012 9:21:38 AM|
@OldOllie, I don't think all artists think the same way.
Male, 50-59, Eastern US
|Sunday, December 30, 2012 7:39:39 AM|
Wow! I think I might be a little bit of a better person after having read your comment. It was...elegant!
Male, 50-59, Midwest US
|Saturday, December 29, 2012 7:55:22 PM|
Kinda makes you feel sorry for artists.
Female, 50-59, Canada
|Saturday, December 29, 2012 12:06:03 PM|
Beauty is the least objective value we can put on a flower - or anything else. Our minds convert our desire to see things like symmetry, balance, complexity, and strong colors into what we call "beauty," yet it varies from person to person. Our life experiences, the people we've known, and things that have imprinted memories on us, all affect our perceptions on what is attractive. If we could learn to see the many levels of beauty in a flower, perhaps we'd learn to do the same with each other.
Male, 18-29, Europe
|Saturday, December 29, 2012 11:54:32 AM|
Gotta love Feynman.
Male, 30-39, Midwest US
|Saturday, December 29, 2012 11:48:33 AM|
"Now, explain gravity, you colorless f*ck!!"
Female, 40-49, Eastern US
|Saturday, December 29, 2012 10:36:58 AM|
Link: Ode To A Flower - Science Vs Art [Rate Link] - Richard Feynman, from the BBC Interview for Horizon 'The Pleasure of Finding Things Out'