Page: 1 2 3 4 Next > Jump to:  Bottom  Last Post
 OldOllie
Male, 50-59, Midwest US
 8712 Posts
|
Tuesday, September 04, 2012 8:26:05 PM
You have no opinion that's a derivative of genius thought. That's been my point all along. You might think you're fooling people with that society nonsense but I don't think you understand the most basic of scientific method. You are a bonehead, you've always been a bonehead. Welcome to the real world dummy.
Let me see if I have this straight. You think a stupid Internet message board is "the real world," and yet you think I'M the dummy?
Why do you have to be such a sore-ass anyway? Didn't mommy's boyfriends use lube when they boned you in the butt? |
|
 madest
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
6406 Posts
|
Tuesday, September 04, 2012 8:57:15 AM
You have no opinion that's a derivative of genius thought. That's been my point all along. You might think you're fooling people with that society nonsense but I don't think you understand the most basic of scientific method. You are a bonehead, you've always been a bonehead. Welcome to the real world dummy. |
|
OldOllie
Male, 50-59, Midwest US
8712 Posts
|
Monday, September 03, 2012 7:56:06 PM
A New Study Shows Conservatives Ignore Facts More Than Liberals
That's only true if liberals get to define what is a "fact." I hate to break this to you, sparky, but disagreeing with liberal opinions is not the same as "ignoring facts."
BTW, your guy's ideas aren't new at all. Casting parabolic mirrors by rotating molten glass as it cools is very old. I learned about the technique 20 years ago, and it was well known then.
http://tinyurl.com/chau7uf
Regarding space-based mirrors, that idea was published by Isaac Asimov in 1941.
http://tinyurl.com/nbanfp
Also, the accelerating expansion of the Universe was predicted 20 years ago, but the guy who predicted it couldn't get his work published, because he wasn't a member of "the club."
|
|
OldOllie
Male, 50-59, Midwest US
8712 Posts
|
Monday, September 03, 2012 7:55:55 PM
I can't see where this genius of your has come up with a single original idea on his own, but then neither have you, so I can see why you admire him. |
|
madest
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
6406 Posts
|
Monday, September 03, 2012 11:55:35 AM
Pathetic. That link was to genius. You're a moron. Welcome to the real world. |
|
OldOllie
Male, 50-59, Midwest US
8712 Posts
|
Sunday, September 02, 2012 10:35:16 PM
Oh, wow, your genius guy actually invented a movable parabolic mirror? Quick! Call the patent office!
Oops, sorry, but I think Sir Isaac Newton beat him to it.
Oh, and in case you haven't figured it out yet, I'm not here to perform for you, dickwad. |
|
madest
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
6406 Posts
|
Sunday, September 02, 2012 5:17:33 AM
OldOllie, You're no genius. You're not a part of any ultimate IQ think tank. This guy is a genius. He and others like him have the intelligence to actually think though a problem. Something you've proven yourself incapable of. |
|
OldOllie
Male, 50-59, Midwest US
8712 Posts
|
Saturday, September 01, 2012 10:13:00 PM
davymid and madest, you both know there is nothing I can say that would dissuade you from your opinions. To you the the issue is as settled as a slab of well-cured concrete (and just as mixed up, I might add).
The Spanish Inquisition enjoyed a much higher level of "consensus" than does the global warming establishment. Does that make them that much more right in their thinking? The only difference is the global warming Nazis can't torture "heretics" and burn them at the stake (much as, I'm sure, they would dearly love to).
You have already proven by your remarks that your minds are completely closed to even considering any ideas that might upset your orthodoxy, so I'll leave you to it. Go ahead and believe whatever you want. I honestly don't give a dry fap what you think. You're not that important to me. |
|
 botfly
Male, 50-59, Eastern US
549 Posts
|
Saturday, September 01, 2012 6:11:53 PM
Ollie, please never argue with an idiot. |
|
madest
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
6406 Posts
|
Saturday, September 01, 2012 6:17:29 AM
OO, I challenged you to dazzle me with your IQ because I doubt your claims of intelligence. You seem to think that knowing someone named Heidi Cullen or Robert Hanson would impress me but they do not. My question was specific and your answer was a dodge. You're no Einstein. You think we born yesterday? I've gotten to read a couple years of your BS and I know that you're trying to con us. Answer the question. Prove me wrong and I'll fund your colloquy. The only climate change skeptics are republican and none of them are climate scientists. |
|
 davymid
Male, 30-39, Europe
11676 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 11:19:18 PM
Ollie, your right-wing politics cloud your every thought. Observable scientific reality is apolitical.
Either the sky is blue or it isn't. Doesn't matter whether it comes from a "Libtard" (as you like to say) or someone else. It's f*cking blue. |
|
davymid
Male, 30-39, Europe
11676 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 11:19:06 PM
In other words, spreading the lie that there's a major debate going on in the scientific community over major matters of mainstream science. In Ben Stein's case, he posited that evolution was a lie, and that intelligent design/Christian Creationism (same thing) was the truth. He proposed that every scientist who opposed evolution was silenced, ostracised from the scientific community, not allowed to publish. Ollie, I know you're smarter than that (you're not dull enough to deny evolution, if I remember your posts on the subject). Do you realise, then, how close you sound to him when it comes to matters of climatology? There is no meaningful debate. There is scientific consensus on the matter, overwhelmingly. To contest that there's some kind of serious debate going on in the scientific community on whether climate change is happening, and in part man-made is a lie. Just as there's no serious debate on the integrity of Evolution as an observable scientific reality. It's moonbattery. |
|
davymid
Male, 30-39, Europe
11676 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 11:14:25 PM
Ollie. Why do you tie observable scientific reality with political stance? They're professional scientists, and >95% of climatologists concur that climate change is real, and that is has at least in part to do with human-induced change. What has this got to do with "the agenda of international socialism"? Seriously man, take off the tin-foil hat.
This idea that any scientist who opposes the scientific consensus of AGW is summarily silenced by his peers, is exactly the same bullcum that that wanker Ben Stein was spouting when he made that "Expelled:No Intelligence Allowed" festering cumbucket of a documentary movie. |
|
OldOllie
Male, 50-59, Midwest US
8712 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 10:27:31 PM
madest, I guess the only way to make a point with you it to hit you over your pointy little head with it. Climate change hucksters can't stand up to honest debate. They have taken over academia and run out all the skeptics. They have taken over the journals and refuse to publish anything that disproves their so-called theories. Heidi Cullen even called for revoking the credentials of meteorologists who don't bow at the altar of global warming. It's "settled science" for no other reason than the alarmists say so.
They're doing this because all the prescriptions for dealing with global warming are in perfect alignment with the agenda of international socialism. Once they control the production, distribution, and use of all energy, they control the world. In their supreme arrogance, they believe they can run our lives better than we can.
But you won't learn the truth sitting around waiting for some anonymous poster on a message board to spoon feed it to you. |
|
 Shelworth
Male, 50-59, Western US
211 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 4:31:32 PM
Good thing no Democrats ever said anything so stupid! oh, wait, remember Hank Johnson? LOL! |
|
madest
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
6406 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 12:09:27 PM
Nice dodge Captain IQ. |
|
OldOllie
Male, 50-59, Midwest US
8712 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 10:46:08 AM
OK let's hear it genius. Mr. Mensa.
Please don't insult me like that. I quit Mensa years ago because they put on a so-called "scientific colloquium" on global warming where every single panelist was a global warming alarmist. The panel included such luminaries of hucksterism as Heidi Cullen and Robert Hanson, but not one single dissenting voice. When I called the central office to complain that this left-handed circle jerk was in no way a "scientific" event, and that it was a blatant violation of Mensa's corporate charter to take an official position on a controversial political issue, they told me if I didn't like it, I could put on my own event. I asked if they would provide the same financial support as this event and advertise it as an official Mensa colloquium, they said no. I said they could take my membership card, fold it 5 times, and take turns shoving it up their @$$es. |
|
OldOllie
Male, 50-59, Midwest US
8712 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 9:59:05 AM
Climate-change deniers: you are very dumb and I don't like you very much.
Climate change alarmists: you are very dangerous, and I hate your f***ing guts. |
|
 An-egg
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
723 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 9:37:59 AM
"During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet." - Al Gore
"You didn't build that." - Barack Obama |
|
 SFVitale
Male, 40-49, Western US
441 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 9:24:04 AM
That's okay. At least they're smart enough to believe that "all men are created equal" only means rich white heterosexual males. They're Neanderthals. |
|
 McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
10187 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 9:11:19 AM
@drawman61
You think you're beter off that's pretty funny! |
|
 drawman61
Male, 50-59, Europe
1389 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 8:57:03 AM
Sorry, guys (Americans) but you put these morons in their positions of power. |
|
 patchgrabber
Male, 30-39, Canada
5252 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 8:52:03 AM
@HA: To me, it would make sense to allow scientists to oversee a science committee...
Dare to dream, dare to dream. |
|
 HumanAction
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
1124 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 8:42:09 AM
@patchgrabber: So it's not the lesser of two evils, it's the evil of two lessers.
Nice quote! - I may have to steal that at some point.
I'd suggest mandatory testing for panel nominees.
To be honest, I'd suggest not allowing politicians to be part of the committee. To me, it would make sense to allow scientists to oversee a science committee... |
|
McGovern1981
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
10187 Posts
|
Friday, August 31, 2012 8:31:10 AM
"During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet." - Al Gore
LOL madest belives politicians as long as they're not republican! |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next >
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}