carsoncasey Male, 30-39, Western US
7 Posts
|
Thursday, August 23, 2012 10:59:08 PM Further VS. Farther should be on that list too. Further down the road, as if in literal distance. Farther in school, as if on to graduate school, etc. I think. |
|
zeebeedee Male, 50-59, Eastern US
   501 Posts
|
Monday, August 20, 2012 8:24:33 PM A post by Fancylad about proper spelling. Buahahahhahahaahahahhahaha! |
|
thescotsman Male, 50-59, Eastern US
  54 Posts
|
Monday, August 20, 2012 12:04:30 PM you can start with the word "nickle" in the title of this post, try "nickel" next time |
|
AvatarJohn Male, 30-39, Southern US
   488 Posts
|
Monday, August 20, 2012 9:06:27 AM Also, irregardless is not a word (I don't think), but if it were, it would presumably mean the opposite of regardless, so you shouldn't use it if you mean "regardless". And literally means the opposite of figuratively. So don't say you're literally sick to death of people who use the wrong words unless you're literally puking your guts out on your literal death bed. Which would be kind of a strong response to grammar and vocabulary and stuff. |
|
patchgrabber Male, 30-39, Canada
   5288 Posts
|
Monday, August 20, 2012 7:07:07 AM Hasn't this been posted before? Maybe I just remember it from looking at the Oatmeal. |
|
drawman61 Male, 50-59, Europe
   1404 Posts
|
Monday, August 20, 2012 4:09:19 AM No one ever mentions til, as in two more miles til we get there. People write till but til is short for until. |
|
OswegoWriter Male, 30-39, Canada
 26 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 8:48:44 PM Wierd wierd wierd wierd wierd wierd wierd wierd screw the dolphins wierd wierd wierd wierd wierd wierd wierd wierd wierd wierd |
|
supermoo9999 Male, 18-29, Midwest US
21 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 8:36:45 PM DuckBoy: There's a credit in the graphic itself, right at the top, under the title. No need to get pissy. darkmagic: My browser *does* flag it as incorrect, but that's not particularly relevant. If we're looking for formality, try the dictionary - it isn't a standard English word. |
|
godthaab Male, 18-29, Canada
   214 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 8:34:46 PM Uh... who makes these mistakes anyways? |
|
HiEv Male, 40-49, Eastern US
   384 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 8:32:25 PM This catches most of my pet peeve misspellings. They didn't mention the people that write "quite" when they mean "quiet" though (the former means "very", while the latter means "making little or no noise"). That one bugs me and I see it surprisingly often. |
|
DuckBoy87 Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   2094 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 7:20:43 PM Please credit TheOatmeal Here, I'll even give you the link to the exact page on which this comic appears: Ten Words You Need to Stop Misspelling Now He had altercations with funnyjunk, I'm sure he wouldn't have a problem fighting you guys. Though I bet my pleas will fall on deaf ears... |
|
avail9988 Male, 18-29, Australia
   621 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 6:25:06 PM Really wish I had of paid attention in school... |
|
Darkalen Male, 40-49, Canada
   97 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 6:24:43 PM This is rediculous... |
|
hyro20 Male, 18-29, Midwest US
5 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 5:44:31 PM Calling someone "Boo" instead of "Beau". |
|
darkmagic14n Male, 18-29, Western US
   1634 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 4:56:52 PM @mykunter: Firefox, which says firefox is wrong unless capitalized, doesn't flag irregardless as wrong. |
|
mykunter Male, 40-49, Southern US
   1587 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 3:49:04 PM Yay for grammar nazis! Irregardless... not a word. Just say regardless. |
|
TheGuySmiley Male, 18-29, Canada
   1187 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 3:13:18 PM its definately weird wheather affect their loose alot than |
|
LordJim Male, 50-59, Europe
   2414 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 2:56:21 PM Uninterested/disinterested. And using 'literally' when it isn't. |
|
mamba Male, 18-29, Europe
   609 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 2:53:06 PM I know my spelling is terrorbull, but even I get these right. |
|
Beardofzeus Male, 18-29, Europe
   520 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 2:40:21 PM Pretty lame post, but I'm glad somebody else has notice the epidemic of 'loosers' online. |
|
OldOllie Male, 50-59, Midwest US
   8751 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 2:39:38 PM When I went to school, you had to know all this before you could advance to 4th grade. |
|
burbclaver Male, 50-59, Western US
   859 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 2:30:09 PM Notice one certain busy poster who can't spell definitely hasn't made a comment! |
|
dkm458 Male, 40-49, Eastern US
12 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 2:22:46 PM Seen would have been correct if you used 'have before it. Saw is past tense; seen is past participle |
|
Ston Male, 30-39, Midwest US
   195 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 2:12:11 PM Dead-Kittens: The word "seen" is the past participle of "see". It is often used with a form of "have," whether it be "have," "has," or "had." "Seen" should not be used by itself as a verb. You only use it if it's referring to a past event that is relevant to the current time. Would you like to see this movie? I have seen it already. When did you see it? I saw it last week.
|
|
Selous Male, 30-39, Australia
   1205 Posts
|
Sunday, August 19, 2012 2:09:54 PM armour ... and every word that ends in our |
|