I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
LatestPopularMost BookmarkedMost EmailedTop RatedMy FavoritesRandomChat
AllGamesFunnyEntertainmentQuizzesWeirdTechLifestyle, Arts & Lit.News & PoliticsScienceSportsMisc
Submit Content  





rss

friendsmore friends | add your site
Funny Videos

Gorilla Mask

Extreme Humor

Viva La Games

Asylum

I hate retail

Free Samples

Oddee

Funny Stuff

FreeGame Heaven

Crazy Games

Anon email

Chaostrophic

Pugorama

Funny Games

Not Healthy

Angelsfire.nl

Funny stuff

Gamers Hood

Crazy News

123 Games

Goofy Humor

Friday Fun

Hot Games

Urlesque



Back to Listing

Bill Nye On The Earth's Climate Change

Hits: 7065 | Rating: (2.2) | Category: Science | Added by: fancylad
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next >   Jump to: Bottom    Last Post
OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 14782 Posts
Sunday, July 15, 2012 9:16:41 PM
mesovortex, you're as full of $#!+ as constipated elephant. You don't have to research the positions of the global warming hucksters. It's being shoved down our throats every day through every possible media source you can imagine. You couldn't avoid it if you tried.

If, however, you seriously wanted to understand the skeptics' position, you actually have to make an effort to hear their point of view in their own words. (Listening to what the liberal media, liberal politicians, and corrupt liberal "scientists" TELL you about the skeptics' positions doesn't count, because they all lie.)

You're the one with his head up his ass, and you seem quite content to keep it there. Well, that's just fine. YOU save the planet by driving around in a f***ing little tinfoil deathtrap. That leaves more gas for me, and if we ever meet at 50 mph, its all the less damage to my V8 SUV.

And "hide the decline" still equals "falsify the data."

5Cats
Male, 50-59, Canada
 26257 Posts
Sunday, July 15, 2012 9:11:15 PM



Goodbye @vortex, no more troll-chow for you!

mesovortex
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 451 Posts
Sunday, July 15, 2012 3:18:13 PM
5Cats:
Data wasn't manipulated. I explained it to you.

Judging by your careless behavior, spelling, and typing, I'm 100% sure you haven't researched this adequately.

I've shown you what really happened. Why do you continually lie? It only makes yourself look bad.

That you are patently wrong in your 'facts' and arguments is just more evidence in my favor.

5Cats
Male, 50-59, Canada
 26257 Posts
Sunday, July 15, 2012 11:20:27 AM
The ClimateGate crew knew that without some TRD included, they'd be laughed at! So they "fixed it" using as severely UN-scientific "trick" (as they called it). "


That's what I said, specifically mentioning that they themselves refered to "hiding the decline" as a "TRICK". Your reply:

You didn't research this. It's actually scientific to do this because that data after a certain point wasn't reliable and was divergent.


Not olny can you read my mind, KNOWING 100% that I've NEVER researched this, nor read papers written by those who have extensively sdone so: you KNOW I have not!
BUT you then say: "it's actually scientific to do this" meaning... THEY DID IT! I don't CARE if you think it's "justified" or valid, THEY DID IT! THAT is all I said, and YOU proved me right.

Deal with reality bro.

mesovortex
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 451 Posts
Sunday, July 15, 2012 3:46:27 AM
5cats:
"Of course it makes absolutely ZERO sense. I suppose I'm just not as smart as @randomvortex is..."

I never said I was smarter than you overall. However, I've definitely researched this topic more than you have and this is quite apparent since I'm able to correct you on many things that you've said and based on the fact that you are incorrect about many things you have said and that you have a terrible understanding of climate science and the current consensus right now, as well as the consensus in the past.

I'd say that's a pretty strong case that you are not very well informed in this subject.

By the way, how hard is it to just copy and paste someone's name? Is it really necessary to mock their names like that and scream at the keyboard? How hard is it to just stick to the facts?

mesovortex
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 451 Posts
Sunday, July 15, 2012 2:40:41 AM
5cats:
"Except, you know, where YOU SAID it WAS manipulated"

I didn't say that. I explained to you that the data wasn't manipulated. I told you probably three times that it wasn't.

You are so dishonest that you are telling other people what they said instead of listening to them.

My creationist remark wasn't an ad hominem either, it was merely pointing out that you're just as dishonest as they are. Calling you dishonest isn't one either, because you actually are being dishonest.


5Cats
Male, 50-59, Canada
 26257 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 9:13:27 PM
You refuse to do that.

@mesovortex: and just how do you know that?
Else you would see yours is invalid


OBVIOUSLY! @OldOllie CANNOT POSSIBLY have done even the slightest amount of research into the matter otherwise he'd 100% AGREE with YOU!

We have shown you that climategate wasn't an issue and no manipulation went on.

Except, you know, where YOU SAID it WAS manipulated... Oh of course that's OK in your books: to 'fix' the data to match the theory.

OldOllie, 5cats: Both of you would make excellent creationists. Have you considered doing that?


HEY MARKUST! Are you paying attention? THIS = Ad Himinum! Get it now?

Of course it makes absolutely ZERO sense. I suppose I'm just not as smart as @randomvortex is...

mesovortex
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 451 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 8:17:27 PM
OldOllie, 5cats:

Both of you would make excellent creationists. Have you considered doing that?

mesovortex
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 451 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 8:16:38 PM
OldOllie:
You're not a skeptic. A skeptic would research their arguments to see if they are valid. You refuse to do that. Else you would see yours is invalid and climategate really was a bunch of hot air and no data was manipulated.

You are denialist because you deny the fact that you are patently wrong regarding that issue. You refuse to read anything that disagrees with you, and you resort to talking points to back up your point when you've been shown to be wrong.

5cats:
The above goes for you as well. We have shown you that climategate wasn't an issue and no manipulation went on. Yet you still cling to that over and over again. The reality is you are clearly incorrect, and you deny this reality continually.

No climate scientist ignores natural Earth changes. That doesn't mean man cannot change climate. We know of no current natural cycle that can account for the current warming.

5Cats
Male, 50-59, Canada
 26257 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 7:29:08 PM
If anyone is wasting time, it's you.

FINALLY! After all those posts! @mesovortex says something that makes sense!

I am wasting my time: reading your idiotic blabbering! Thanks for the heads-up!

vv @OldOllie is bang-on! The ClimateGate emails prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the entire AGW Scare is based on "junk science".

Earth gets warmer, Earth gets cooler. It's been doing so with or without human help for a very long time!

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 14782 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 7:24:02 PM
"mesovortex, you just keep drinking your Kool-Aid like a good little liberal, and let us hide the decline from those bad old skeptics."

mesovortex
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 451 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 5:25:59 PM
5Cats:
There have been plenty of factual responses to your posts - but you ignored them all and resorted to childish name calling or saying stuff like "I know you are but what am I".

You aren't able to discuss this on an adult level, nor are you intellectually honest enough to know when you are wrong, or how you can be shown wrong.

If anyone is wasting time, it's you.

mesovortex
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 451 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 5:24:24 PM
5Cats:
I offered evidence that showed from a survey of publications in the 1970s that there was a clear consensus of global warming even then, and that the 'ice age scare' was just a media job.

When I said what consensus, I meant what 'ice age' consensus.

Just because I proved you were wrong doesn't mean you can further backpedal and call me shifting my goalposts - which I'm not.

mesovortex
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 451 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 5:23:03 PM
OldOllie:

Wrong.
http://tinyurl.com/y8rz995

The published science is not some bully. You're confusing that with creationism and the denialist crowd. The truth is that if you have real data you will not only become famous, but your research will become a focal point of future funding and science will change around you. What scientist doesn't want that?

Those scientists that are 'shunned' are usually shunned not out of evidence, but because they think they have evidence and really don't - or because they are dishonest. This is why those that believe in ID are usually shunned from biology discussions - because they are dishonest creationists.


OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 14782 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 4:56:54 PM
[quote">Don't get your science from the media, get it from journals.[/quote">
inaria, the problem is that the journals are just as corrupt as the hoaxers behind the Climategate emails. They refuse to publish anything that contradicts the preconceived orthodoxy. Doing so will get an editor summarily fired. Not only can skeptical scientists and professors not get works published, they, too, are likely to be fired for not toeing the global warming line.

There is no such thing as honest scientific inquiry in this subject area. If you value your career, you follow the politically correct orthodoxy, or you will be destroyed.

If you don't believe that this kind of intimidation is commonplace, just read here.

OldOllie
Male, 60-69, Midwest US
 14782 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 4:45:44 PM
Climatologists and scientists VS corporations and oil barons...Who to trust...who to trust...

The Climategate emails PROVED that the global warming alarmists are frauds and hoaxers. The undeniable fact is, there is absolutely no possible way to construe "hide the decline" as meaning anything but "falsify the data."

Given that, I'll take the corporations and the oil barons. They at least provide a valuable commodity that makes my life better. The hucksters are only offering more socialism and central planning which has only brought poverty, misery, and mass murder wherever it has been imposed.

inaria
Female, 18-29, Canada
 1521 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 3:40:06 PM
Don't get your science from the media, get it from journals.

inaria
Female, 18-29, Canada
 1521 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 3:38:30 PM
Oh I actually saw this when it aired on TV...That newscaster is so ignorant I wanted to bash my head against a wall. The fact is, scientists (in academia, therefore publishing their finding in academic journals) have been calling for something to be done about global warming for years. For decades. In fact, many believe we have reached the point of no return now. Too little too late. The fact that people on this forum are still so ignorant (that they assert the findings of tens of thousands of scientists is manipulated lies) just goes to show that the world, but most particularly America is being groomed by media and crazy people to believe that Science isn't telling us the truth, and scientists aren't to be trusted. Yes, there are always crack pot scientists out there (like the one who wrote a false paper linking Autism to vaccinations), you have to look at what is peer reviewed and accepted by the majority of the scientific community.

5Cats
Male, 50-59, Canada
 26257 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 2:31:49 PM
SO: I'm not being a hypocrite, eh?
Ad Hominum means you're trying to agrue something.
I'm just insulting him, no bones about it!

I notice you complete LACK of actual resonses to my assertions/questions, but you're criticizing ME for not responding politely to @baal? Hummmm...

5Cats
Male, 50-59, Canada
 26257 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 2:23:56 PM
There was no consensus about that:

@mesovortex = moving the goalposts.

OK @mesovortex, who's sock-puppet are you? @madest? Is that you with your arm up @mesovortex's arse?

@Markust: @Baal has brought that "you're a liar" up before and I called him on it then. He's a coward and a bully yet you support that? Nice!
So he brings it up AGAIN and I reply with some ACTUAL lies he posted.
That is called presenting the facts.
I accused him of hypocricy and then showed evidence. =/= ad hominum.
Post #2 Continues to provide evidence by listing his lies.
Post #3 I tell him what I think of him: not "ad hominum" because I'm not trying to prove/disprove anything! Just letting him know my opinion.
It's being straight-up RUDE! (Me that is) NOT a flawed for of arguement, ffs!
I'm putting the slipper on CinderBaal's foot, and BOY does it fit well!

SirTNZ
Male, 70 & Over, Western US
 28 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 1:51:09 PM
Bill Nye... Still Awesome!

markust123
Male, 40-49, Western US
 3784 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 1:31:45 PM
I'm moving on. I was just seeing if you were honest enough to admit you were being a hypocrite. I got my answer.

mesovortex
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 451 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 1:26:09 PM
CrakrJak:
You are scientifically illiterate. You are a creationist. I don't expect you to give a very good rebuttal to anything science related.

mesovortex
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 451 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 1:24:17 PM
auburnjunky:

Climate Scientists are well aware of milankovich cycles. However they are too long term to explain the current short term warming we are now seeing.

They explain changes over 10-30,000 years. We're currently seeing massive changes over 100 years.

mesovortex
Male, 30-39, Southern US
 451 Posts
Saturday, July 14, 2012 1:22:36 PM
5cats:
"SO: There was NO manipulation of the data, except when there was, and 5Cats doesn't know he's telling the truth, here's proof of it!"

Manipulation of data means changing it. The data was not changed. The data that was shown was the relevant data. Not showing irrelevant data is not manipulation.

If I were to chart average highs in the northern hemisphere and hide data from stations that were not reliable or accurate, that wouldn't be manipulation of data. That would be careful selection of verified data.

Page: 1 2 3 4 Next > 

You Must be Signed in to Add a Comment

If you've already got an I-Am-Bored.com account,
click here to sign in.

If you don't have an account yet,
Click Here to Create a Free Account
 

Back to Listing ^top


Bored | Suggest a Link | Advertise | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.