|Page: 1 2 Jump to: Bottom Last Post
Page: 1 2
Male, 50-59, Western US
|Wednesday, June 27, 2012 1:50:02 PM|
There's a certain logic in this. They're using one makebelieve
character to back up the existance of another.
Bring on the UNICORNS!
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
|Wednesday, June 27, 2012 1:45:18 PM|
Sigh, and this is why creationists shouldn't be allowed within 5 feet of a school. Trying to use a myth which has been debunked time and time again to try and disprove something that has been proven is like trying to use Santa to prove that magical unicorns exist. It doesn't work. Asides the fact that proving evolution wrong doesn't make creationism any less wrong.
Male, 40-49, Southern US
|Wednesday, June 27, 2012 1:39:25 PM|
Look, religious types already believe in one mythical being, so they obviously have trouble differentiating fantasy from reality.
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
|Wednesday, June 27, 2012 1:24:04 PM|
Link: Loch Ness Monster Being Used To Debunk Evolution [Rate Link] - Not quite sure how this argument works, but OK...