I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
LatestPopularMost BookmarkedMost EmailedTop RatedMy FavoritesRandomChat
AllGamesFunnyEntertainmentQuizzesWeirdTechLifestyle, Arts & Lit.News & PoliticsScienceSportsMisc
Submit Content  





rss

friendsmore friends | add your site
Asylum

Holy Taco

Funny Videos

BuzzFeed

NothingToxic

Oddee

Mousebreaker

Online Games

Eat Liver

Online Games

Gorilla Mask

Full Downloads

Norway Games

Damn Cool Pics

Kontraband

Extreme Humor

X Hollywood

I Dont Like You

123 Games

Hollywoodtuna

Funny Games

Cool Stuff

Viva La Games

X - Vids

Smit Happens

Funny Videos

Funny Stuff

ebaumsworld



Back to Listing

Viewing Child Porn On The Web Legal In New York

Hits: 7550 | Rating: (2.9) | Category: News & Politics | Added by: mamba
Page: 1 2 Next >   Jump to: Bottom    Last Post
Skrubz
Male, 18-29, Europe
 20 Posts
Friday, May 11, 2012 4:46:48 PM
"Imho, there should be nothing, absolulely nothing, legal, in any way, with regards to child porn. In a perfect world, it would be completely, ruthlessly purged from the internet."

So if you're browsing Facebook, and happen across a profile that has child porn on it, you WANT to go to jail? Good for you.

FinkStinger
Male, 30-39, Canada
 147 Posts
Friday, May 11, 2012 3:44:26 AM
That caption makes my brain hurt.

Altaru
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 3500 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:33:51 PM
Has anyone actually had serious child porn pop up on their computers? I don't know anyone who has.

4chan.

Back when it was truly evil instead of filled with white knights like it is now.

Enough said.

lukeforv123
Male, 18-29, Western US
 1047 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 5:52:23 PM
They did it because teenagers are 'sexting' each other more often, and if someones under the age of 18, even if they're only 15 looking at their naked 15 year old girlfriend, that's considered looking at child-porn. Too many teenagers got busted for this, because legally, it's a crime.

VirtualParty
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 794 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:49:56 PM
Good move. I browse 4chan from time to time and don't want to be held liable for some stupid troll.

This bill was obviously passed by a very techno savvy judge. Evidence of active downloading and not passive cacheing is what separates this clause.

lawndartsftw
Male, 40-49, Canada
 1815 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:44:12 PM
Imho, there should be nothing, absolulely nothing, legal, in any way, with regards to child porn. In a perfect world, it would be completely, ruthlessly purged from the internet.

5Cats
Male, 50-59, Canada
 24910 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 12:59:07 PM
Has anyone actually had serious child porn pop up on their computers? I don't know anyone who has.

@LordJim: Not kiddie porn, but years ago my brother's computer got so infected by porn pop-ups he had to scrub the hard drive. No anti-virus he tried could stop it! (and he's a programmer!)


Gerry1of1
Male, 50-59, Western US
 33910 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 12:11:35 PM

Has anyone actually had serious child porn pop up on their computers? I don't know anyone who has.

Yes. In a chat window someone sent me a vile pic of a youngster in ... I won't describe it.
I suspect it was probably an undercover cop on the chatlines trying to catch people. But I didn't ask or solicit, it was just sent with "do you like that?"... I deleted and closed the window, but if "viewing" meant posession then I'd be guilty never having ever had child porn.

Though child porn is aweful, but the idea that "viewing something on the net is the same as posessing" is like saying 'looking at a hooker is the same a f*cking one'.

LordJim
Male, 50-59, Europe
 4434 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:46:00 AM
sweetrebelnc

Maybe, but as far as I know that kind of poo is not available to the average punter. It is limited to the dedicated.

patchouly
Male, 40-49, Canada
 4564 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:34:20 AM
Crabes:
"its about either viewing child porno content or possessing it, i said viewing should'nt be allowed, if one as view 1000 picture of child porno he is clearly a customer of that and should be charge as so even if doesnt possess it:
--------

Crabes nailed it. If a guy winds up with a pop up of child porn, he should be arrested for it. However, if he's watching popups of child porn on a daily basis, then the "it was an accident" excuse goes out the window, IMO.

DromEd
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
 1559 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:32:03 AM
Has anyone actually had serious child porn pop up on their computers? I don't know anyone who has.


It's never happened to me. However I've had suspicious things happen while following links through the sites that are listed here at IAB as friends. Hop from link to link to link and all of a sudden crap starts popping up as quick as I can close it. Like a serious game of Wack-A-Mole. As a result I don't further into those sites than a single re-direct from here.

sweetrebelnc
Female, 18-29, Southern US
 846 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:27:05 AM
@LordJim, you just haven't been to the really good porn sites.

Norris
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 996 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:09:02 AM
should be legal to catch the pedos..

recognize someone, or someplace = caught pedo

madest
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
 6458 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:42:52 AM
Yeah I've always felt this was a slippery slope argument. There has been child pornography since man could draw. Much of the art at the Vatican would be considered child pornography under our current laws. To limit one medium you limit them all. Glad the judges woke up to the lunacy of anyone who looks is a pedophile.

LordJim
Male, 50-59, Europe
 4434 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:42:52 AM
Has anyone actually had serious child porn pop up on their computers? I don't know anyone who has.

Matwix_2004
Male, 18-29, Europe
 2105 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:30:33 AM
FoolsPrussia - Chances are if you even have an email address then you've had some and not realised it. If you have a spam filter/folder, then there is almost no chance you will have, but you'll technically have it on your computer and thus can be arrested for it. I wouldn't be surprised if a fair few people who have been arrested for it actually didn't know it was there.

Crabes
Male, 30-39, Canada
 1049 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:28:08 AM
its about either viewing child porno content or possessing it, i said viewing should'nt be allowed, if one as view 1000 picture of child porno he is clearly a customer of that and should be charge as so even if doesnt possess it

DromEd
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
 1559 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:28:04 AM
It's a tricky issue. We all want the sickos out there punished but what happens if you accidentally stumble upon it. We've all hit an embedded link and been taken somewhere we didn't expect. I'd hate for the 5-O to bust down my door for something like that. Where do you draw the line?

FoolsPrussia
Male, 30-39, Western US
 3398 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:26:04 AM
A virus could very easily plant these images on your hard drive, could it not? And it's possible to stumble upon something seedy online unintentionally. Say you're on some message board and someone posts one of these images. Is it your fault if you saw it?

LazyMe484
Male, 18-29, Canada
 10503 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:25:47 AM
Not a crime... It doesn't harm anyone to watch it, just as it doesn't harm anyone when people watch videos of... people being gassed by nazis, or something like that.

Besides, you can't fight human nature. There will always be a small percentage of sick people, and thus always demand. Cut off the supply - that's the only way.

Tiredofnicks
Male, 30-39, Europe
 4790 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:25:33 AM
Rejoice 4channers!

patchgrabber
Male, 30-39, Canada
 5708 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:24:42 AM
Actually I agree with the judges. What if some child porn picture pops up on my computer, or a virus puts them on there and I delete them. They're still stored in the cache, but it's not like I was possessing child porn.

tedgp
Male, 30-39, Europe
 3283 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:14:55 AM
Thats not what the lawsuit/judgement was about. You are talking about something COMPLETELY different.

Crabes
Male, 30-39, Canada
 1049 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:11:53 AM



Crabes
Male, 30-39, Canada
 1049 Posts
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:09:49 AM
ted if someone can view it then someone will produce them and use child to do so bad bad

Page: 1 2 Next > 

You Must be Signed in to Add a Comment

If you've already got an I-Am-Bored.com account,
click here to sign in.

If you don't have an account yet,
Click Here to Create a Free Account
 

Back to Listing ^top


Bored | Suggest a Link | Advertise | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.