 teknollag
Male, 18-29, Canada
 164 Posts
|
Friday, February 03, 2012 2:23:44 AM
I don't understand who the hell would ever waste so much time on a machine like this.. "Hey, I've got an idea! Smoking is bad for us, right? How about we get a machine to smoke for us?!" "Brilliant!" |
|
 frenchroast
Male, 30-39, Canada
381 Posts
|
Thursday, February 02, 2012 11:17:13 PM
That device isn't going to see it's 3rd birthday at this rate. |
|
 fistingisfun
Male, 30-39, Europe
57 Posts
|
Thursday, February 02, 2012 5:01:53 AM
What a complete waste of time.
Who do I invoice for that time back please?
Sheesh...IAB you're getting worse. |
|
 xCYBERDYNEx
Male, 18-29, Southern US
4798 Posts
|
Thursday, February 02, 2012 2:09:50 AM
Saw this a couple months ago. |
|
 kittehdee29
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
803 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 8:51:04 PM
why... why did I watch this? |
|
 sweetrebelnc
Female, 18-29, Southern US
737 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 8:16:08 PM
I'll take a dozen please. |
|
uatme
Male, 18-29, Canada
790 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:46:33 PM
does it run off the power it gets from smoking? |
|
ledgehead
Male, 40-49, Canada
464 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 3:06:38 PM
Just about as good as the on off box, except the box is more interesting to watch;
www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ojhZaP5_JI
|
|
 Fatninja01
Male, 18-29, Australia
23995 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 2:16:54 PM
Its a marvel of mechanical engineering... with no real purpose |
|
slightlys
Male, 18-29, Western US
61 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 2:07:14 PM
Why not just burn a pile of money? It in essence achieves the same goal. |
|
 swoop408
Male, 18-29, Western US
1768 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 2:00:50 PM
So what in the drating hell is the point? |
|
 Apexs
Male, 30-39, Western US
265 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:52:09 PM
ahh reminds me of Grandma |
|
 ddaq89
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
124 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:39:16 PM
For those that want the second hand smoke without those pesky smokers |
|
 hopeislost
Male, 30-39, Canada
200 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:25:59 PM
@patchgrabber No doubt...that would be a huge waste of weed. A good bong would be better, and would use a lot less pot. An aqualung would work even better |
|
 patchgrabber
Male, 30-39, Canada
5252 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:02:54 PM
A better machine would be one that rolls your joints for you hands-free.
And it's puff-puff-PASS, greedy machine. |
|
 jendrian
Male, 18-29, Canada
2352 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 11:47:47 AM
that's the dumbest thing I've ever seen |
|
 InTheNameOf
Male, 30-39, Western US
329 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 11:43:54 AM
Huh, why don't new comments show up until after I submit my own? IAB needs a faster database? |
|
InTheNameOf
Male, 30-39, Western US
329 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 11:42:18 AM
I imagine that would be a waste of weed! |
|
patchgrabber
Male, 30-39, Canada
5252 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 11:41:26 AM
If I used it with weed then I'd be wasting my weed. Why would I want to do that? |
|
 DoctorSlutba
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
46 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 11:37:58 AM
From the looks of it, it would be a waste of weed... |
|
 MrAtari
Male, 30-39, Europe
1075 Posts
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 11:34:30 AM
Link: The Cigarette Smoking Machine [Rate Link] - Imagine if you used this cigarette machine... WITH WEED! |
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}