I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
LatestPopularMost BookmarkedMost EmailedTop RatedMy FavoritesRandomChat
AllGamesFunnyEntertainmentQuizzesWeirdTechLifestyle, Arts & Lit.News & PoliticsScienceSportsMisc
Submit Content  





rss

friendsmore friends | add your site
Asylum

Holy Taco

Funny Videos

BuzzFeed

NothingToxic

Oddee

Mousebreaker

Online Games

Eat Liver

Online Games

Gorilla Mask

Full Downloads

Norway Games

Damn Cool Pics

Kontraband

Extreme Humor

X Hollywood

I Dont Like You

123 Games

Hollywoodtuna

Funny Games

Cool Stuff

Viva La Games

X - Vids

Smit Happens

Funny Videos

Funny Stuff

ebaumsworld



Back to Listing

Recent 9/11 Photos Prove WTC Exploded From Inside

Hits: 16117 | Rating: (1.6) | Category: News & Politics | Added by: someone?
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next >   Jump to: Bottom    Last Post
Ruffiana
Male, 30-39, Western US
 508 Posts
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 3:33:49 PM
Why is it so hard to believe that human beings would want to do this or would be capable of doing this simply because they're from outside the US?

It makes me sad that there are fellow Americans who truly believe this poo and no amount of rational explanation, testimony, evidence, or just goddamn common sense will ever convince them otherwise.

lizbian_2
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
 185 Posts
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:37:38 AM
people are dumb

PhotoKing
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 523 Posts
Tuesday, January 10, 2012 4:15:53 PM
another non engineer knows it all. dust comes from cement which the building was full of. steel melts and weakens, building fell pretty fast,not an hour. you won't see much office stuff because much of it was in the hole, and covered with molten slag. the government while not really always truthful had NOTHING to gain from this at all. we made a different excuse to get into afganistan, we don't need much to start a war.

opium? really? we strip mined the place? i find that hard to believe to cause that much damage for very little pay off. and they set explosives just where the plane happened to hit - well done.

furryblob
Male, 18-29, Europe
 577 Posts
Tuesday, January 10, 2012 6:58:31 AM
RT is not always a reliable source.

Sloppy1
Male, 18-29, Canada
 269 Posts
Monday, January 09, 2012 7:15:30 PM
@highonhuffin, sounds like you have your head shoved up your @ss, keep smokin buddy.

highonhuffin
Male, 40-49, Western US
 180 Posts
Monday, January 09, 2012 5:44:09 PM
Wow, a bunch of ignorant Canadians and Euro-trash posting on this one. Big surprise.

UDUMASS
Male, 30-39, Canada
 61 Posts
Monday, January 09, 2012 1:26:01 PM
The U.S. government is slowly screwing all Americans over, and most of them are too dense to see it happening all around them. Glad to live in CANADA!

pompousass7
Male, 40-49, Canada
 261 Posts
Monday, January 09, 2012 12:57:12 PM
when will america wake up and realize your government lies to you non stop

patchgrabber
Male, 30-39, Canada
 5708 Posts
Monday, January 09, 2012 7:28:52 AM
Well I'm sure that either explanation is acceptable for your country to depose governments of other independent countries. Nothin' wrong with that.

almightybob1
Male, 18-29, Europe
 4278 Posts
Monday, January 09, 2012 7:07:26 AM
His was the only testimony that was taken in secret and does not appear in the commissions report.

In fact, the overwhelming majority of the 1,200+ witness testimonies and interviews were not made public. Only 160 were. It says this right in the preface of the 9/11 Commission report.

A smart tactical move by our enemy would have forced an air & ground attack.

Debatable. An air attack clearly worked just fine, so committing more troops would have been a waste of resources considering they achieved most of their objectives with a very small number.

almightybob1
Male, 18-29, Europe
 4278 Posts
Monday, January 09, 2012 7:07:03 AM
There was a witness to 9/11.

There were hundreds.

He testified to the 9/11 commission that he was loading an injured person from an explosion into a waiting ambulance when the first plane hit.

How do you know that if his testimony was secret?
But anyway, all the quotes I can find of him make no mention of helping injured people BEFORE the plane hit. They all describe his actions immediately AFTER.

He had a government provided top secret clearance.

I very much doubt that janitors are entrusted with Top Secret clearance even in buildings like the Pentagon, never mind a commercial building. Why would they give the guy who cleans the windows and empties the bins access to information that could damage national security?

swiftkeys
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 481 Posts
Monday, January 09, 2012 6:06:41 AM
lulz. Here we go again...

meowmeowmeow
Male, 13-17, Eastern US
 190 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 8:58:01 PM
LOLOLOL
More of this poo. Cracks me up every time I read it.
Also pisses me off how I find these on the history channel.

madest
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
 6458 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 8:03:57 PM
There was a witness to 9/11. His name was William Rodriguez. He was a janitor at WTC for 19years. He testified to the 9/11 commission that he was loading an injured person from an explosion into a waiting ambulance when the first plane hit. William Rodriguez was one of only 5 people who held a master key that opened all suites. He had a government provided top secret clearance. His was the only testimony that was taken in secret and does not appear in the commissions report. There are things we don't know about 9/11. A smart tactical move by our enemy would have forced an air & ground attack. A shame our government doesn't think we can handle the truth. You can look him up.

mcboozerilla
Male, 30-39, Europe
 649 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 12:57:32 PM
Cranks.

randomxnp
Male, 30-39, Europe
 1224 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 10:24:46 AM
PopCap

Most people who are as thick as you are try to hide it. You are doing a lot of good for the low-IQ community by being so open about it. However your claims are also nasty and vicious. Surely there is some more pleasant way of showing how dumb you are, like try to persuade your friends to rearrange their furniture in line with feng shui.

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11358 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 9:39:06 AM
The WTC collapsed has been studied in multiple countries using multiple different scientific approaches. Very methodical studies by very educated and intelligent people have concluded the collapse would not have happened because of burning fuel.


Then you'll have no trouble providing references, will you?

I'll be blunt - I think you're making it up, creating a false appeal to authority.

TkA
Male, 30-39, Western US
 115 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 7:32:48 AM
all right cool, so where are the 2000 pictures?

andybme
Male, 50-59, Western US
 296 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 7:19:35 AM
New evidence? This video is almost one year old.

MeGrendel
Male, 40-49, Southern US
 4477 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 7:18:36 AM
UnoWild-"The empire state building was hit before"

Empire state building is of different construction than the WTC. (google 'Steel frame' and 'tube frame')
A 767 weighs over 13 times more than a B-25 and carries 35 times more fuel (Avgas vs. Jet-A) and was traveling much faster.

Do you REALLY thing they are comparible?

UnoWild-"and the hole it made burned for weeks"

Cite please. The report of the B-25/Empire State building states it was put on in 40 minutes (a little less than 'for weeks') In fact, still the only fire at such a height that was ever successfully controlled.

Mr_Pedo_Bear
Male, 70 & Over, Southern US
 820 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 6:36:54 AM
Conspiracy theorists like to think they're special they can see it all clearly. But more importantly they can't accept how little control they have over they're lives. Like with religon they have to believe there is some over arching power which can decided if they live or die and protect them. For them it's comforting to believe you're government can take as exact a control as this, because otherwise a few maniacs are able to to this much carnage and that scares them. They just can't accept how chaotic and out of control our lives really are....

Samsquanch
Male, 30-39, Canada
 794 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 6:29:43 AM
...show me where it's happened before in a similar way...


That's been my argument exactly. Especially for the Pentagon theorists,"ZOMG! Where's the wreckage?! Planes crashing leave wreckage!"

Well, the vast majority of plane crashes, the pilot was trying to avert a crash, and thus was taking maneuvers to avoid a crash (decreasing speed, pulling up, etc), and thus would have left some trace behind.

PopCap
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 507 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 5:48:22 AM
The WTC collapsed has been studied in multiple countries using multiple different scientific approaches. Very methodical studies by very educated and intelligent people have concluded the collapse would not have happened because of burning fuel. There's no real point in having videos like this. The people who can understand math and physics come to a conclusion. People who are on the other end of the education spectrum come to a conclusion and, as expected, the conclusions are as polarized as the IQ levels. Reports one way or another are not likely to sway thinkers from thinking or emotion...ers from emoting. Some people absolutely, positively refuse to believe the truth, no matter how obvious the evidence. Really, though, would we want it any other way? Stupid people are great fun to watch.

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11358 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 5:11:24 AM
Immense steel beams, perfectly truncated in the rubble.


Which, of course, can't possibly have anything to do with the photos and video clearly showing workers cutting the steel beams during the clearing of the rubble.

WTC7? Don't piss down our backs, and tell us it's raining!


I would like the conspiracy "theorists" to stop doing that, I really would.

Musuko42
Male, 18-29, Europe
 2833 Posts
Sunday, January 08, 2012 4:45:17 AM
And for those who are saying that a steel frame skyscraper has never been brought down by fire before, perhaps you're correct...

...but as far as I know, a large jet liner has never been deliberately rammed into a steel frame skyscraper before...so exactly what prior event(s) are people comparing this to in order to declare that this event does not have the expected outcome?

Brought down by fire, perhaps not.

Brought down by a jet liner deliberately ramming into it: show me where it's happened before in a similar way to a similar building and the building has remained standing, then you'll have a point.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next > 

You Must be Signed in to Add a Comment

If you've already got an I-Am-Bored.com account,
click here to sign in.

If you don't have an account yet,
Click Here to Create a Free Account
 

Back to Listing ^top


Bored | Suggest a Link | Advertise | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.