 britt566
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
 2313 Posts
|
Wednesday, November 23, 2011 4:07:34 AM
Crotchless panties = laziness. |
|
 mithraela
Female, 18-29, Western US
536 Posts
|
Tuesday, November 22, 2011 9:05:59 PM
We must acknowledge that teens are sexual animals that phuck. They'll make it up as they go along anyway.. unless of course they're scared to death because "YOU" don't educate them properly. As parents there is very little "you' have to teach children, but i guarantee you most of them will be phucking behind your back because you are all giant pussies afraid of crotchless underwear. |
|
mithraela
Female, 18-29, Western US
536 Posts
|
Tuesday, November 22, 2011 9:04:13 PM
People are still infantile and stupid.... way to go ozmose. Someone has to hail the glory of teens sexing up teens. It is underwear. There is no pedo sign on them that says "these are for use by underage girls to phuck adults," But by the way everyone is acting that is exactly what was done. Sorry if you didn't get laid as a teen (like i did many times) but i think that underwear without a crotch isn't going to change the world. We were phucking without them in stores marketed for us. But if a parent is going to have a healthier role as a sexual "rolemodel" (someone who's phucked a lot and lived to tell of it with wisdom) i think perhaps the purchase of such things as toys and sexual apparel along with wise advice as to what it is to be a healthy "sexual animal" is less dangerous than what people here are doing. |
|
 Ozmose
Male, 30-39, Midwest US
383 Posts
|
Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:06:59 AM
First of all I doubt they were sized to fit a little girl, just not this lady's huge ass.
Second, when I was 16 my 15 year old girlfriend had crotchless panties, and it was awesome. |
|
 Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
9533 Posts
|
Sunday, November 20, 2011 8:42:31 AM
How do adult men get inside a boardroom, decide what merchandise should be sold, and okays crotchless panties for children?
Why are you assuming that happened?
Nobody okayed crotchless panties for children.
The board of directors for a business doesn't directly do stock control for individual outlets anyway. That would be silly and impossible. |
|
 carlsagan
Male, 18-29, Western US
120 Posts
|
Saturday, November 19, 2011 9:10:08 PM
I cannot comprehend how this even exists in a kids store, imagine if Toys-R-Us started selling sex toys, after it's called Toys-R-Us, they did have that jar jar jinks sex doll for kids. The dementia of your Child's innocent mind. nWo for all. |
|
 tacks
Female, 18-29, Canada
151 Posts
|
Saturday, November 19, 2011 7:43:57 PM
How do adult men get inside a boardroom, decide what merchandise should be sold, and okays crotchless panties for children? |
|
 Lauryn
Female, 18-29, Australia
440 Posts
|
Friday, November 18, 2011 10:41:01 PM
OMG.. If i had have walked into a shop named 'kids & teens' and seen this i would have started an uproar that would have the shop closed down! Why the hell did the manager/stock orderer(i know not a word)... think this was a good idea? |
|
 ledzeppeloyd
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
2184 Posts
|
Friday, November 18, 2011 9:51:18 PM
people scold pedophiles yet there is this push to become a whore a such a young age, im not saying pedos should get off, but come on poo like this just encourages it |
|
 PinkHomicide
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
330 Posts
|
Friday, November 18, 2011 8:30:05 PM
If people think that woman is prude, I must be the biggest prude to walk the earth because I was sickened by the fact that they now sell padded bras for pre-teen girls. |
|
 earthshone
Male, 18-29, Western US
1699 Posts
|
Friday, November 18, 2011 6:34:34 PM
thats some f uhked up shh hit |
|
 vaalkyr
Female, 18-29, Western US
14 Posts
|
Friday, November 18, 2011 3:01:04 PM
I have young girls and I wouldn't want to see this walking into a store shopping with them... I have nothing against that kind of thing but it belongs in a different store that doesn't have "Kids" in the name. |
|
 sweatpeanis
Female, 18-29, Western US
418 Posts
|
Friday, November 18, 2011 11:44:16 AM
*is a |
|
sweatpeanis
Female, 18-29, Western US
418 Posts
|
Friday, November 18, 2011 11:44:02 AM
"...is so fail."
What the drat does that even mean?
And robosnitz in a perv in every post. |
|
savapenne
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
17 Posts
|
Friday, November 18, 2011 9:41:32 AM
i'm guessing the ppl saying this woman is a prude probably don't have any kids themelves, or are child molesterds and like the pervert panties.... |
|
 Corpsecrank
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
869 Posts
|
Friday, November 18, 2011 6:03:10 AM
"Why are people trying so hard to defend this?"
Mostly because the lady who made the complaint and did this news interview is so fail. |
|
 robosnitz
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
2752 Posts
|
Friday, November 18, 2011 3:00:12 AM
What a prude. |
|
 evanbartlett
Male, 30-39, Western US
546 Posts
|
Friday, November 18, 2011 12:06:15 AM
"Young children" is very much in the eye of the beholder. When I hear "young children" I think toddler to 10. Obviously, these are intended for high school kids. This is not a big deal. |
|
 OldOllie
Male, 50-59, Midwest US
8712 Posts
|
Thursday, November 17, 2011 11:57:09 PM
When kids go to a store, they don't usually check out the underwear. The only way the kid would have even noticed this was if her aunt called it to her attention. So now I'm wondering, how did she explain the purpose of crotchless underwear to her young niece so that it would make her sick. |
|
 collegebound
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
3471 Posts
|
Thursday, November 17, 2011 11:54:31 PM
mithraela: I agree with you...but there is a difference between educating them about sex and giving them sex toys and other goods for personal use...
why are people trying so hard to defend this? they tried to sell sex goods to minors...shun them like you would a black guy for trying to sell dope to a white kid... |
|
 PoopNoodle
Male, 40-49, Midwest US
397 Posts
|
Thursday, November 17, 2011 11:46:07 PM
@mithraela
Female, 18-29, Western US
Well said |
|
 xCYBERDYNEx
Male, 18-29, Southern US
4798 Posts
|
Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:46:27 PM
Facepalm |
|
 Baalthazaq
Male, 18-29, Asia
4753 Posts
|
Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:32:59 PM
"It's ok, we cater to teens too"
... has anyone informed their legal department that "If there's grass on the field, play ball", is not genuine application of law. |
|
mithraela
Female, 18-29, Western US
536 Posts
|
Thursday, November 17, 2011 8:48:30 PM
A pedo has sex with children... I don't do that. I am only making a point about "real world" sexuality. We are in an era where people grow into adults "MENTALLY ILL" about sexuality because we still aren't educating in a straight non-moralistic animal way. Human sexuality is as basic as the bodies and brains that live it. We can study animals and find their sexual habits to be so natural, but when it comes to humans the older people get the more mentally deficient "frightened" and outright ignorant otherwise healthy adults get. Call me a person who thinks "off" but having studied psychology for fifteen years starting with family counseling and progressing through human sexuality and paradigms. This forum is full of people reacting like ignorant "unhealthy minded" amateurs. There is a physiology and psychology to how sexuality "actually" works, and I "especially" won't be concerned if you do not agree with me. |
|
Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
9533 Posts
|
Thursday, November 17, 2011 6:24:49 PM
Come to think of it, how many teenagers would want to shop at a place called "Kids and Teens" anyway? Wouldn't that would fall foul of the "I'm not a kid!" thing? |
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}