 richanddead
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 514 Posts
|
Monday, October 10, 2011 2:32:35 PM
oct. 10 is here, and Anon is full of BS. |
|
 ledzeppeloyd
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
2197 Posts
|
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 11:10:16 PM
unfortunatly they gave it up because some dick weed punk was selling his soul to the other side, being a double agent |
|
ledzeppeloyd
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
2197 Posts
|
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 11:04:39 PM
@illios yea me too, but i hate the 1% more, and they're the only ones that can do it |
|
 HeadiesRusH
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
329 Posts
|
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 9:05:56 PM
Please tell me they're not just bullpooting. I love a good hacker story. |
|
 collegebound
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
3521 Posts
|
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 12:38:08 PM
i dont think that its really anon doing some of this stuff...they are making too many moves too fast |
|
 illios
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
183 Posts
|
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 10:08:49 AM
jamie76 - Guess they changed their minds about Facebook then? |
|
illios
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
183 Posts
|
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 10:01:19 AM
Anyone else getting tired of Anonymous' crap?
Shut up and give it a rest already. |
|
 Aedran
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
295 Posts
|
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 9:35:13 AM
Wait. Hold on. The U.S. government can assassinate Anwar al-Awlaki, who "may have possibly" been involved in Al-Qaeda, but we can't arrest a bunch of fat nerds living in their moms' basements for cyberterrorism? |
|
 trippyhippy9
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
510 Posts
|
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 4:34:28 AM
The people with the money will be the ones with their backs to the wall when the revolution comes. |
|
jamie76
Male, 30-39, Western US
2249 Posts
|
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 12:49:39 AM
@CrakrJak,
I'm pretty sure the Brits called the revolting colonist terrorist also...
and if you think for a second that the CIA/NSA/FBI has a snowballs chance in hell of chatching Anon or even stopping them then you haven't been checking the score board lately Sparky.
Anon has taken down any and every website they have wished to without so much as a scratch. Not to mention their offshoot LulSec already defaced the CIA's website.
instead of sucking the balls of a government that is out of control and raping its people maybe you should jump on board and forget for a second that you are some right wing brainwashed fool and join the revolt to take this country back from the ultr-rich and ultra-corrupt.
|
|
 Neagle
Male, 30-39, Western US
1405 Posts
|
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 12:01:05 AM
Messing with the lovely folks at the NYSE is not a good idea.
 |
|
 max5121
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
271 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 10:10:35 PM
I don't know a lot about stocks and how the market works, but I am under the impression that millions of middle class people rely on their investments in the market. Wouldn't an attack on the NYSE destroy the economy, pushing the middle class into poverty and the wealthy would get richer due to likely bailouts? This all seems counterproductive, but then again i no nothing about the economy:/ |
|
 CrakrJak
Male, 40-49, Midwest US
14460 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 9:54:02 PM
Have to love how they post their cyberterrorist intentions beforehand, gives the FBI/CIA plenty of time to set a trap for them.
This could be just a ruse, but somehow I doubt it. |
|
 Baelzar
Male, 40-49, Western US
1348 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 9:29:49 PM
Thaaaat's right, Anonymous. Keep baby stepping closer to that line.
One of you fools will step over it. |
|
 Draculya
Male, 30-39, Asia
6696 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 8:36:30 PM
Who cares if their web page goes down. It's not like they hit the trading systems. |
|
 Angelmassb
Male, 18-29, S. America
15474 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 6:48:55 PM
"UPDATE: Some in the Anonymous collective believe the threat against the NYSE and the group behind it don't really represent the Anonymous movement or the Occupy Wall Street protests. We've published a report on those counter-claims" |
|
 BrimstoneOne
Male, 30-39, Canada
2232 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 6:43:22 PM
Hmmm, Thanksgiving (in Canada). I'll see to believe it. Mind you, it will be used to do warfare like it hasn't been seen on this continent in over a century, on the general population ("middle class" and ANY group that the corporate/rich elite see fit to attack). Since all police forces and large portions of the U.S. military have been either compromised or infiltrated in some form or other.
I say let them try. And remember, who's voice is louder, the few, or the the many? |
|
 Scuzoid
Male, 30-39, Western US
1270 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 6:26:40 PM
To expound:
Awlaki vs Anonymous
Imminent threat: No vs Yes?
Part of an enemy army: Yes? vs Yes?
Other governments unwilling to act: Yes vs Yes
Nationality act
Declares allegiance to a foreign state: No? vs No?
Serves in a post, armed forces, NCO, or officer of a foreign state: Yes? vs No
Lets say anonymous keeps pressing their luck and success. At what point will those who accepted Awlaki's assassination accept gunning down white suburbanites? Do they need to target NORAD before they're free game? What about something less military oriented. What if they successfully pull off some Die Hard movie shiot and screw up the traffic lights in LA?
I'm okay with killing people based on evidence. Imagine the scenario where an Anon deserves to die. Now re-imagine it without proof of the action and he is killed anyway. |
|
 mal_BB
Male, 18-29, Europe
1224 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 6:18:19 PM
"Anonymous, morally right or wrong, is a cyberterrorist organization"
Look at the amount of money made in the arms trade by governments (not just the US; as a Brit that would be a pot calling the kettle black), together with other atrocities which get quietly swept under the rug, all paid for with our money, and without our permission, and you'll soon see who the real terrorists are. |
|
Scuzoid
Male, 30-39, Western US
1270 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 6:05:21 PM
"Anonymous, morally right or wrong, is a cyberterrorist organization"
So you're saying when Obama sends his hit squad after these guys, it'll be okay since they're terrorist's and all? |
|
 BlankTom
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
6541 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 6:00:19 PM
it just shows how ignorant anonymous (and by extension the operationwallstreet protesters) are |
|
 robosnitz
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
2752 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 5:21:36 PM
Do it! DO IT!!!!! BRING THIS WORLD TO IT'S DAMN KNEES!!!! THEN MAKE IT SUCK IT!!!!NO TEETH OR YOU'LL SHOOT IT'S CHILDREN IN THE HEAD!!!!Nah, just kidding. |
|
 November_Rai
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
322 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 5:21:01 PM
I hope they do it. I love anonymous. At least they do SOMETHING. |
|
 madest
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
6411 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 3:36:57 PM
I admire them. It will be awesome when they do what they claim. They are legion. |
|
 Rick_S
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
2861 Posts
|
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 3:26:55 PM
Anonymous, morally right or wrong, is a cyberterrorist organization that engages in illegal activities. |
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}