Page: 1 2 Next > Jump to: Bottom Last Post
Spider_sol Male, 18-29, Midwest US
   1454 Posts
|
Saturday, September 24, 2011 10:59:33 PM Damn, that was a huge block at :12. Probably would've gotten a penalty in the NFL. |
|
HokieHiTech Male, 18-29, Eastern US
  57 Posts
|
Saturday, September 24, 2011 3:31:16 PM Its UVA - Wise( university of va at wise co.) its uva's liberal arts school, that also has a small football team that is also called the cavaliers, mostly for ppl who couldnt make the Uva team. They are even more stuck up and want to be aristocrat than Uva. GO HOKIES! |
|
syke22 Male, 18-29, Southern US
   1029 Posts
|
Friday, September 23, 2011 12:00:57 PM Doorman, at the end it said Cavaliers. It is the Cavaliers |
|
Doorman Male, 30-39, Eastern US
  59 Posts
|
Friday, September 23, 2011 11:31:49 AM Doen't UVa stand for "University of Virginia"? This is not the Cavaliers though.. |
|
WobxFobxdobx Male, 18-29, Western US
  54 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:53:09 PM Try doing 14 laterals on a game-winning drive, and I'll be impressed. |
|
PierreJeanFR Male, 40-49, Europe
   1336 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:51:11 PM lol at Blatto |
|
Blatto Male, 18-29, Western US
   359 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:21:33 PM That was a cool play. It's a shame that I'm now deaf. |
|
Pheeshy5 Male, 18-29, Western US
   1316 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 7:48:06 AM @Scuzoid TLDNR or care |
|
Scuzoid Male, 30-39, Western US
   1270 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:28:26 AM That isn't a knock. That's a great thing for that guy, but mentally challenging for the viewer it is not. Much the same way Boxing just isn't nearly as strategic as MMA, Soccer and Baseball simply aren't as complicated as Basketball and Football. |
|
Scuzoid Male, 30-39, Western US
   1270 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:23:13 AM But if you grew up watching/playing Football, Basketball, or MMA, it was clear you'd never have any interest in the three older sports (As american's have shown with soccer since we had baseball, football, and basketball before we had any real soccer teams). They're right as far as I can tell. I can assure you, most americans recognize just how utterly boring soccer is thanks to having sports, with plainly, more scoring on the scoreboard. I don't disrespect soccer as a sport, there is no doubt the people playing it are athletes, that said, I can easily see a mentally handicapped person being a successful soccer star provided his parents started him early on the physical conditioning required to compete. |
|
Scuzoid Male, 30-39, Western US
   1270 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:15:35 AM "dumb "sport"" Was listening to a local ESPN radio debate the other day. The debate started off with Baseball's declining television ratings, but eventually got into the heavy stuff. The question was "Why are fewer people(americans) tuning in for baseball, and for that matter, Boxing and Soccer?" At the end the commentator's, who were all 40+ Baseball and boxing aficionado's decided it was very likely because "Basketball, Football, and MMA and just the more intelligent, strategic, and exciting sports." There determination was, if you grew up watching/playing soccer, boxing, or baseball, you appreciated what those sports are, and you are likely to maintain a certain bond to the sport no matter what new sports emerged. |
|
tsiemens Male, 30-39, Canada
   432 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:01:42 AM wow, football. YAWN |
|
JoeYC Male, 18-29, Europe
   725 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:00:19 AM ohhh touchdown! touchdown!!! ahhhh orgasm down!!! dumb "sport" |
|
Fatninja01 Male, 18-29, Australia
   23995 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:54:43 AM That was not planned just lucky... |
|
manorrd Male, 30-39, Europe
   2998 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:42:41 AM Thanks, Scuzoid.
|
|
nospoons Male, 18-29, Australia
   184 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:14:11 AM excited commentator is excited. |
|
Scuzoid Male, 30-39, Western US
   1270 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:47:40 AM Because in professional football, they know a fumble as a result of catching your offensive blockers off guard with a lateral pass is too great a risk for the extra 10 yards he may or may not pick up. Better off designing the play so the initial receiver/running back just gets 10 more yards on his own. |
|
manorrd Male, 30-39, Europe
   2998 Posts
|
Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:21:10 AM I've always wondered why you don't see more of this in American Football. It's perfectly legal, and so many times I've seen someone go down with a whole slew of teammates wide open to receive a lateral pass to keep the play going. |
|
auburnjunky Male, 30-39, Southern US
   8692 Posts
|
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:21:40 PM Just found out, this is NAIA not NCAA. Rules might be different. I don't know enough about NAIA to make a call. It might be a penalty that is assessed at the end of the run in that league, and since he scored, it would be assessed on the PAT. |
|
auburnjunky Male, 30-39, Southern US
   8692 Posts
|
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:14:54 PM "He got knocked down before he was going after the kicker and slid into him because of another player." That's roughing the kicker all day. It could be interpreted as "running into the kicker" which is only a 5 yard penalty, and re-kick. Make no mistake though, the TD shouldn't count. |
|
drworm2002 Male, 30-39, Western US
   456 Posts
|
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:13:12 PM He didn't rough him. The player was sliding on the ground. He got knocked down before he was going after the kicker and slid into him because of another player. The other guy fell to the kickers right and never touched him. |
|
auburnjunky Male, 30-39, Southern US
   8692 Posts
|
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:45:30 PM To answer you trutenrman, The coach cannot challenge a non reviewable play. |
|
auburnjunky Male, 30-39, Southern US
   8692 Posts
|
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:44:27 PM NCAA automatically reviews every play. The rule though, is, if the next play gets off before they officially review it, then they have to begin to review the next play. Roughing the kicker is a non reviewable penalty though. Much like pass interference, it is referee's judgement. |
|
TruTenrMan Male, 30-39, Southern US
   2174 Posts
|
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:41:16 PM @auburnjunky This is NCAA, doesn't the coach had a review option (assuming he hadn't already used it). I'm not sure if it matters if the clock had stopped on the play. |
|
TruTenrMan Male, 30-39, Southern US
   2174 Posts
|
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:39:41 PM @Revolutioniz I watched it a few more times, and I'll give him the "toss it away" instead of fumbling. That definitely WAS roughing the kicker though; even if it was unintentional, it was still a foul. You don't touch the kicker. Ever. |
|
Page: 1 2 Next >
|