Link_Hiei Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   5158 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:52:55 AM This touched me. I've always wanted to go into space. I can slowly feel my hate for this country rising. |
|
Beardofzeus Male, 18-29, Europe
   520 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:17:19 AM Yay NASA! More space exploration please, less benefits for long-term unemployed. |
|
Klamz Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   693 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 9:53:41 AM Don't forget about the temperpedic beds, those are just lovely. And NASA didn't create Velcro it was sold to them by the Vulcans, I saw it in enterprise. |
|
GRadde Male, 18-29, Europe
   2567 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 9:03:29 AM He has several good points, as do Pechorin. Live, NASA, live! |
|
Pechorin Male, 18-29, Europe
5 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 8:32:21 AM Frankly anyone who makes the old "why spend money up there when we have problems down here" argument is just ignorant. Anyone know the first part of NASA's mission statement? "To improve life here, to extend life to there, to find life beyond." Despite their efforts in space, NASA's greatest contributions have always been to society here on Earth. Some things we owe to NASA: -Cell phones -MRI technology -DVDs -Cordless tools -Household smoke detectors -Velcro -Shoe insoles -Bar code scanners -Breathing system for firefighters -Artificial heart pumps -Robotic-assisted surgery -Digital mammography And more. Yeah, clearly a terrible waste of money. |
|
uhmerikin Male, 30-39, Southern US
   871 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 8:22:17 AM I love seeing this guy on The History Channel or some science show. Somehow he can take some super complicated subject like thermo-nuclear fusion of dark matter within a vacuum (yes, I just made that up so slow your roll) and explain it so simply, clearly and concisely that you almost feel like you understand it. |
|
Cajun247 Male, 18-29, Southern US
   9438 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 6:47:57 AM Whilst I agree wholheartedly with your sentiment Dr. Tyson but don't put all your eggs in one basket. NASA has had successes but not without horrific failures. There's good news though, private companies are now taking up the slack and making it cheaper for John Q. Public to go into LEO. |
|
inversegrav Male, 30-39, Eastern US
   711 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 6:22:27 AM sucks watching a nation hang itself. and i get to live in it. |
|
barrooo Male, 30-39, Europe
   390 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 4:57:51 AM When people talk about the cost of the space programme they should also realise that for every dollar spent on the apollo missions $14 dollars was generated for the U.S economy. |
|
MattyP Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   173 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 4:54:19 AM I'm sad now and I'm not even at work yet. This was a terrible way to start my day. Thanks America. |
|
Subushie Male, 18-29, Southern US
   1643 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 2:11:07 AM Amen Neil, I<3U. |
|
abrxax Male, 18-29, Eastern US
  69 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 1:49:58 AM Its funny. NASA ditches the shuttle and hopes that private companies fill the void. Well in steps I.T.A.R. and screws it all up. The components to make a space craft and all restricted. Most are made by one manufacturer. Can't go outside the country to Europe to get parts. Some components are just not made in the USA anymore. With the shuttle program gone American lead in science and tech is over. Europe has the LHC. Russia and china are the only countries to have maned space flight now. My fellow Americans we are watching the end of the great dream. |
|
ak47reaper Male, 18-29, Midwest US
   108 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 1:30:12 AM thank you. |
|
xCYBERDYNEx Male, 18-29, Southern US
   4798 Posts
|
Monday, July 18, 2011 11:30:46 PM Interesting point of view |
|
davymid Male, 30-39, Europe
   11682 Posts
|
Monday, July 18, 2011 11:25:06 PM Yeah, watched the vid now. Pretty awesome. Pretty goddam awesome. |
|
davymid Male, 30-39, Europe
   11682 Posts
|
Monday, July 18, 2011 10:26:59 PM Haven't watched the link yet, but I just wanted to say that I'm delighted that the correct use of the term "lose" was used in the description, rather than "loose". Yeah, I know, I need to get out more. |
|
intrigid Male, 18-29, Canada
   880 Posts
|
Monday, July 18, 2011 10:02:18 PM "how can you sit there and call the exploration of the universe a waste of time and money? Have you looked at the amazing pictures that the space telescopes have brought to the world via the interlolz? I would pay half a penny at every check for that alone." I see no reason why the government needs to be involved. Let private corporations pursue space travel. |
|
ComradJurgis Male, 13-17, Midwest US
1 Posts
|
Monday, July 18, 2011 9:50:36 PM "it's always sad to a science program die, but when that money can be used to go to a more productive area of science(eg cancer research), it has to happen." I highly doubt that the money will be used to fund a "more productive area of science". In fact I am almost positive we will find some way to relocate the money into our ridiculously high defense budget. Hooray war!
|
|
SilverThread Male, 30-39, Western US
   3360 Posts
|
Monday, July 18, 2011 9:45:47 PM The Future of the Human Race is among the stars. There is no doubt in my mind about that, if we are to continue to survive, much less evolve, as a species it will not be on Earth. It's simply untenable. Don't get me wrong, I believe Earth will always remain a part of our makeup, but we're at the point in our evolution where, like an adolescent standing on the porch of their parents house, we must decide, do we go out into the wide universe or do we hide in the basement and never strive to know our potential. |
|
LazyMe484 Male, 18-29, Canada
   10503 Posts
|
Monday, July 18, 2011 9:45:34 PM the US spends only slightly less than the rest of the world combined on its military. That's exactly my point. The question was rhetorical. NASA may be out, or slowed, or whatever... but that doesn't mean space exploration is at a standstill. There's still the private companies, the Europeans and the japs. |
|
walkrunfly Male, 18-29, Canada
   117 Posts
|
Monday, July 18, 2011 9:25:32 PM I'm all about science, but sometimes money can be better spent elsewhere. NASA started off not about science, but about beating the russians in the space race, now it's over-developed compared to other areas of science. People don't identify with NASA like they did back then, so it can't justify the money spending, simple as that. Yes, it is important to further science (even when it's just for science sake, as the saying goes) but it's not always worth the cost. it's always sad to a science program die, but when that money can be used to go to a more productive area of science(eg cancer research), it has to happen. Anyways i thought the guy talking seemed like a douche |
|
auburnjunky Male, 30-39, Southern US
   8696 Posts
|
Monday, July 18, 2011 9:13:39 PM "You do mean 19 billion correct?" Yes. 19 billion, of 4 trillion. That was before they cancelled the shuttle too. |
|
Sachi001 Male, 30-39, Asia
   598 Posts
|
Monday, July 18, 2011 8:40:28 PM Well I'll tell you what. You get big and filthy rich soon. Give about 2 Billion of your hard earned money. Well probably much more after a few years of inflation. Build a gigantic bad ass Hubble like telescope and send it up for a few looks into the distance for a few minutes of enjoyment. Then back to the life grinder. |
|
xtkm1x Male, 13-17, Southern US
   418 Posts
|
Monday, July 18, 2011 8:19:27 PM how can you sit there and call the exploration of the universe a waste of time and money? Have you looked at the amazing pictures that the space telescopes have brought to the world via the interlolz? I would pay half a penny at every check for that alone. |
|
Sachi001 Male, 30-39, Asia
   598 Posts
|
Monday, July 18, 2011 8:14:51 PM Heck we spend way more on trying to explore on outer space then we do on inner space. Such as the inner earth or ocean depths. Try learning more about earthquakes, volcanoes, geology, marine life and ocean currents as a more priority here first. Rather than trying to spend exuberant money on how to mine planets first. Then after we obtain ample supply in our own backyard then maybe reaching other planets would be more feasible. |
|