meepmaker Male, 30-39, Southern US
   6716 Posts
|
Monday, November 29, 2010 9:20:07 AM Well that was a waste of time. Oh well. I am bored. |
|
Wiggle1111 Male, 18-29, Europe
   78 Posts
|
Monday, November 29, 2010 7:52:23 AM I see no CGI. |
|
binarystarr Male, 30-39, Europe
   477 Posts
|
Monday, November 29, 2010 5:03:17 AM why would you do all this in CGI - that would make it far more expensive than using traditional methods or at least a blend. |
|
Vanadil Male, 18-29, Europe
   149 Posts
|
Monday, November 29, 2010 2:07:24 AM All i see is a kitchen Advert. Why is that in CGI? |
|
Tisjokar Male, 18-29, Australia
   991 Posts
|
Monday, November 29, 2010 12:40:07 AM photoshoped |
|
LuckyDave Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   628 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:23:12 PM James Cameron's Avatar was done mostly against blue screens, or in a barn or both, and people still have the gonads to say this is fake. ...or real... Lets put it this way, I've never seen something done so meticulously that I'm actually having a moment where I question the linguistics needed to express the validity of this video. |
|
television17 Male, 13-17, Australia
 49 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:16:37 PM I refuse to believe that is CGI. Someone prove it to me first. |
|
ROK9 Male, 18-29, Western US
   1838 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 8:41:12 PM nice |
|
Link_Hiei Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   5158 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 6:28:34 PM Neat. |
|
Sarph Male, 18-29, Europe
   195 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 6:07:05 PM Mah grapes are turnin into diamonds. |
|
GurnBlanston Male, 40-49, Western US
   245 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 2:42:25 PM and the uncanny valley doesn't even apply to inanimate objects, it really only applies to people... |
|
GurnBlanston Male, 40-49, Western US
   245 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 2:37:57 PM @zyran - rendering took that long 10 years ago, not anymore. It takes hundreds of hours to set up these shots, getting the shaders and the lighting and the textures perfect, but modern hardware can render the final frames in seconds, practically in realtime. And I'm pretty sure these guys aren't using typical consumer PCs, they're using render farm systems with dozens of processors. |
|
betardfooser Male, 30-39, Eastern US
   562 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 2:13:08 PM eek! inanimate object uncanny valley! |
|
genbadger Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 29 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 1:54:49 PM Sends shivers down my spine |
|
danthew Male, 18-29, Europe
   2137 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 12:48:27 PM I call bs |
|
Ranakamarth Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   295 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 12:48:17 PM I don't believe it! It is too easy to fake amazing CG effects nowadays... |
|
zyran Male, 18-29, Asia
 26 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:52:57 AM While very impressive, it still costs more per frame than actually shooting actual footage. Renders are extremely time consuming and expensive. Each frame of that video could easily take a couple of hours to render with a typical consumer PC. |
|
FuriousTuna Male, 13-17, Europe
 39 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 9:51:40 AM ...crap. |
|
TR-Wolf Male, 18-29, Europe
   1565 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 9:48:03 AM Yeah yeah realistic lemons, very good, but it's not got any humans in it, because that's when we'd be able to tell they're CGI. I await the day we have CGI humans that just look totally real :) |
|
Flibmeister Female, 18-29, Europe
   840 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 6:04:13 AM i just sh-t CGI bricks. they were very well rendered. |
|
APJ311 Male, 13-17, Europe
   755 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 4:12:50 AM Woooooooooooooooooooooooow. |
|
pugsley Male, 18-29, Asia
19 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 2:20:29 AM If its really 100% CGI then thank god cause we will never need real objects. Better still if actors become redundant because we can digitally put them in. The discrepencies between false and real lighting within an environment cant fool our judgement of real objects against computer graphics and this will always be apparent. It looks false when the two combine. Good work, lets just all go digital. -sarcasm |
|
DickenMcHunt Male, 18-29, Midwest US
   1140 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 2:19:38 AM Everything these guys make is CGI- they have a few making-of video's (http://vimeo.com/8200251) It's two guys that are very good at their craft. Keep in mind that this is all inanimate objects in controlled motion and demolition. We're not talking about people- or cars- or anything incredibly complex. Video was found via Gizmodo: http://is.gd/hUhDg Check out the other making-of videos and their other video's for more examples of what these guys are capable of. |
|
IONIC Male, 18-29, Canada
   164 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 1:47:53 AM @littlepete50: I think you are thinking of eXistenZ, a movie that came out in 1999 staring Jude Law |
|
littlepete50 Male, 18-29, Europe
   1364 Posts
|
Sunday, November 28, 2010 1:22:11 AM What's that film where they put the helmets on and play a game but it's unmistakably like real life, then they take their helmets off, but it's all part of the game, and they're still in the game but don't know it? Yeah. |
|