mithraela Female, 18-29, Western US
   536 Posts
|
Wednesday, November 10, 2010 4:21:53 AM I think a person's position on the issue of what age is proper for phucking is largely influenced by how old they were when they got their first great phucking. If a person's first sexual experience was non-consensual, (and they are less than society's model for beauty) then they are likely to be against anybody enjoying phucking, especially if they are young and hot. On the other hand, if the first phucking was consensual and great, well that person would sing a different tune. My first phucking was younger than what many people find to be appropriate. They can go to hell. I thought it was great... Of course, you should abide by laws, or you will go to jail for a long time, but that doesn't necessarily mean the laws properly reflect the issues. |
|
inaria Female, 18-29, Canada
   1512 Posts
|
Saturday, October 30, 2010 10:35:38 PM Er this "child" was 17? Um yeah...he's probably just playing the victim card because he parents intercepted the messages. |
|
LionHeart-72 Male, 18-29, Western US
   494 Posts
|
Saturday, October 30, 2010 8:51:41 PM Umm, sounds to me like this Brock guy had a pretty sweet deal going... why sound the alarm now? |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   9533 Posts
|
Friday, October 29, 2010 3:58:45 PM The whole point is that a child of 14 is not mature enough to make decisions like that, just like they're not mature enough to drive, or drink, or vote. Therefore their consent or lack of it is not the main issue. Scenario 1: 14 year old consents to sex with someone. Scenario 2: 14 year old is knocked out, tied up and raped. Not the main issue..so the difference between those two scenarios is at best secondary? Really? I think there's a very great deal of difference. |
|
robosnitz Male, 40-49, Eastern US
   2752 Posts
|
Friday, October 29, 2010 9:10:21 AM Victim? More like "lucky S.O.B." |
|
jtrebowski Male, 40-49, Southern US
   3057 Posts
|
Friday, October 29, 2010 6:18:23 AM There's no surprise thar Brock is a Republican. http://armchairsubversive.blogspot.com/ |
|
almightybob1 Male, 18-29, Europe
   4278 Posts
|
Friday, October 29, 2010 5:53:59 AM I'm not saying it should be legal, just that it shouldn't be called "child molestation". It usually isn't, it sounds more like statutory rape to me. The whole point is that a child of 14 is not mature enough to make decisions like that, just like they're not mature enough to drive, or drink, or vote. Therefore their consent or lack of it is not the main issue. |
|
turkeyman89 Male, 18-29, Eastern US
  59 Posts
|
Friday, October 29, 2010 1:35:29 AM Oh yeah... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= dLy5xIjA6Z8 |
|
joosen52 Male, 18-29, Midwest US
   206 Posts
|
Friday, October 29, 2010 12:21:20 AM there's no such thing as a free ipod |
|
Weakmonkey Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   190 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:40:29 PM Where were all these women when I was in high school? I grew up in the wrong time period. |
|
CodeJockey Male, 30-39, Midwest US
   2397 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 8:05:10 PM That is so not molestation. Waste of court time. |
|
pussay Female, 18-29, Western US
22 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 7:44:49 PM
 |
|
duffytoler Male, 40-49, Midwest US
   5220 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 7:04:16 PM Tip of the iceberg for this sh*t. Only makes headlines when it's a politician's wife or something. |
|
Angilion Male, 40-49, Europe
   9533 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 5:27:06 PM Ah, so there's no difference between sexually abusing a child against their will and consensual sex with someone who's an adult minor. Yeah, the law makes plenty of sense. This sort of thing really annoys me. It trivialises sexual abuse of children and that's just plain wrong. It's not the same thing at all and it shouldn't be called the same thing or treated as the same thing. It's a completely different offence. |
|
moefreak Female, 18-29, Europe
   1969 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 4:34:21 PM I'm sure apple can appreciate this kind of publicity. I just have to say that I really think there should be a different word for "14 year old voluntarily having sex" and "child molestation". And yes, I would be saying the same thing if the 14 year old in question was female. I'm not saying it should be legal, just that it shouldn't be called "child molestation". |
|
XxCraigxX Male, 13-17, Canada
   114 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 4:21:12 PM What an ugly ugly thing... |
|
CoffeeDiiva Female, 40-49, Eastern US
   1615 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:58:29 PM pfft 17 give me a break, however they started when he was 14 now that is a little blah |
|
Angelmassb Male, 18-29, S. America
   15474 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:33:11 PM She looks so normal and aligned, who would guess it! |
|
Gerry1of1 Male, 50-59, Western US
   25536 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:29:26 PM Mom: "My poor baby abused by that..that...that woman!" Dad: "That's muh'boy!" |
|
Gerry1of1 Male, 50-59, Western US
   25536 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:13:22 PM lucky kid got laid at least twice. Lots of guys can't get one date let alone a girlfriend AND a mistress. that kid is my idol |
|
handys003 Male, 50-59, Western US
   2402 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:45:02 PM Geez with those scary looking eyes (shudders.......) Brrr.... |
|
aust4beer Male, 30-39, Midwest US
   196 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:29:59 PM Stupid kid admitted to this. He should have kept his mouth shut, he had a good thing going |
|
PBZebras Male, 18-29, Western US
   208 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:08:14 PM Standards |
|
Ajikan Male, 18-29, Europe
   1538 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:04:27 PM She even gave them condoms. Pedophilia is a blurry line, when forcing someone to have sex or doing it when they don't even have a notion of whats going on its wrong. I don't think this is wrong tho. |
|
DixxyRarr Female, 18-29, Midwest US
   2677 Posts
|
Thursday, October 28, 2010 1:46:38 PM Ooo bummer, lady. |
|