cynic04 Male, 18-29, Southern US
   87 Posts
|
Wednesday, December 07, 2011 8:27:53 AM Love the disclaimer on the bottom... +/- 4% |
|
Linkenberger Male, 18-29, Canada
   1066 Posts
|
Sunday, September 05, 2010 12:34:50 PM Florida: We're right 46% of the time, 100% of the time. |
|
TheTrees Male, 13-17, Eastern US
   259 Posts
|
Saturday, September 04, 2010 9:48:55 PM ...46%? |
|
bomb_tom Male, 18-29, Canada
   437 Posts
|
Saturday, September 04, 2010 12:03:12 AM this is typical of any news station that drowns viewers with american-flag graphics |
|
chinesemath Female, 18-29, Western US
   131 Posts
|
Friday, September 03, 2010 10:34:30 PM the florida strikes again |
|
entwife Female, 18-29, Western US
   537 Posts
|
Friday, September 03, 2010 1:18:35 PM thecranberry, is that always your response when you can't understand something? |
|
thecranberry Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   728 Posts
|
Friday, September 03, 2010 12:46:43 PM ...and then, suddenly, entwife started her period. |
|
entwife Female, 18-29, Western US
   537 Posts
|
Friday, September 03, 2010 12:32:37 PM *Understanding of statistcs and mathematical charts and graphs FAIL |
|
entwife Female, 18-29, Western US
   537 Posts
|
Friday, September 03, 2010 12:32:04 PM no no NO The pie chart is still incorrect. If you do use percentages in a pie chart, they should add up to 100%. The pie chart is representing 100% of this guy's supporters, not 100% of the total voters for all candidates. So out of all the people that support this guy, x% are independents, y% are republican, and z% are democrat, which should all add up to 100%. A pie chart for all voters for all candiates would show that this one candidate got 46% of the vote, and other candidats got the other 54%. What they probably did is take the percentages from the entire pool of voters and mashed them together in a pie chart. What the data actually said was probably that 27% of ALL independents were voting for this guy and 8% of ALL democrats, and so on. For this to work, they should have just used numbers instead of percentages. That would probably have been a better representation of the actual data. Understanding of statistics and mathematical charts and |
|
trippyhippy9 Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   497 Posts
|
Friday, September 03, 2010 4:21:33 AM The pie chart adds up to the 46%. The other 54% is most likely in a different pie chart, for 1 or possibly 2 other candidates. Basically, this guy is getting 46% of the vote. |
|
sulfox Male, 13-17, Europe
15 Posts
|
Friday, September 03, 2010 4:16:24 AM You people know nothing. You are getting the 'data' percentages with the pie chart percentages. If I were to replace those percentages with numbers of people, you wouldn't have a problem. What is so different about percentages? |
|
Baalthazaq Male, 18-29, Asia
   4753 Posts
|
Friday, September 03, 2010 4:05:38 AM Look. Go into excel. Put in 4 numbers. (27%, 8%, 11%, 54%) Make a pie chart out of 3 of them. It has no problem. This is intentional. This is correct. |
|
Baalthazaq Male, 18-29, Asia
   4753 Posts
|
Friday, September 03, 2010 4:02:42 AM Sigh. A pie chart takes numbers, and makes a total, that is out of a percentage. Those numbers can be dollars. The dollars don't need to add up to 100 to make a proper pie chart. Those numbers can be people. The people don't need to add up to 100 to make a proper pie chart. those numbers can be percentages. The percentages don't need to add up to 100 to make a proper pie chart. 54% of people in Florida, didn't support Chiles. Therefore they're not on the chart. This is perfectly acceptable. Just like not all the money in the world needs to be in a pie chart about money. Not all the people in the world need to be in a pie chart about demographics. Not all the people in Florida need to be in every pie chart about Florida. Even if they're being represented as a percentage of a larger total than the scope of the pie chart. |
|
MikeyNiv Male, 18-29, Europe
   649 Posts
|
Friday, September 03, 2010 2:41:40 AM >I don't see any problem with this at all. 46% of Florida supports Chile. WTF IAB? shouldnt make up a whole pie chart though |
|
paddyt07 Male, 18-29, Europe
   1064 Posts
|
Friday, September 03, 2010 12:28:04 AM Would have been a little more sensible to have the other pie charts there so the numbers add up. |
|
Link_Hiei Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   5157 Posts
|
Friday, September 03, 2010 12:08:50 AM Uhhhh. |
|
GuardinGnome Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   2900 Posts
|
Thursday, September 02, 2010 10:43:03 PM I don't see any problem with this at all. 46% of Florida supports Chile. WTF IAB? |
|
Gleeballs Female, 18-29, Southern US
   856 Posts
|
Thursday, September 02, 2010 10:07:45 PM it was probably just breaking down a percentage's percentage. like out of the population of florida voters, the percentage of chiles voters were either those 3 parties. |
|
TR-Wolf Male, 18-29, Europe
   1565 Posts
|
Thursday, September 02, 2010 9:44:42 PM @Baalthazaq : It's saying those are percentages of Chile's supporters, therefore that should still be 100% in total, as it'd be all of the supporters. |
|
aprilkayyy Female, 18-29, Eastern US
 33 Posts
|
Thursday, September 02, 2010 9:02:52 PM @Baalthazaq- They're not voting on supporting Chile (as in the country). It's a poll determining which parties (and percents) are voting for Bud Chiles, who was the Independent bid for the Florida gubernatorial race. So, for everyone making fun of Florida's "indecisiveness" - it actually makes sense for Independents (as in the party) to be voting for an Independent candidate. Bud Chiles has since dropped out of the race, though. |
|
Baalthazaq Male, 18-29, Asia
   4753 Posts
|
Thursday, September 02, 2010 8:55:05 PM So, 46% of Florida support Chile. What exactly is the problem here? |
|
adlinbaby Female, 18-29, Eastern US
   404 Posts
|
Thursday, September 02, 2010 8:53:40 PM Apparently only the people that waste their times voting are idiots. |
|
aprilkayyy Female, 18-29, Eastern US
 33 Posts
|
Thursday, September 02, 2010 8:41:57 PM @Xerasia Actually, this is Central Florida Channel 13 news. It has no affiliations with FOX... actually, it's affiliated with CNN. It runs exclusively on Bright House networks... which if I recall does not run in Tampa. You're thinking of Tampa's myfox channel 13. Different logos, different companies. |
|
betardfooser Male, 30-39, Eastern US
   562 Posts
|
Thursday, September 02, 2010 8:39:43 PM @ connor53: there's no *think* about it! Florida *is* retarded! This is proven fact, no debate... |
|
Septemberex Female, 13-17, Southern US
   653 Posts
|
Thursday, September 02, 2010 8:39:06 PM Poor Florida. Everyplace has their backwaters. |
|