Page: 1 2 3 Next > Jump to: Bottom Last Post
ngfan Male, 13-17, Western US
 27 Posts
|
Saturday, July 24, 2010 11:25:57 AM Anal bleach. <3 |
|
MountainBord Female, 18-29, Eastern US
   1898 Posts
|
Friday, July 23, 2010 6:37:12 PM wheres ur mom? |
|
stormEsky Female, 13-17, Southern US
 43 Posts
|
Wednesday, July 21, 2010 6:39:04 AM anal bleach and michael jackson 2008 look like the same color.. but i'd still buy it. |
|
LookItsLeia Female, 13-17, Southern US
  56 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:55:37 PM I'd buy it |
|
Rheaonon Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   366 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 20, 2010 11:25:42 AM gangrene is black dead musscle and skin tissue |
|
nofatchicks Male, 18-29, Western US
   261 Posts
|
Monday, July 19, 2010 10:38:32 PM lmfaooo @ r. kelly yellow |
|
campofclay Male, 30-39, Western US
   177 Posts
|
Monday, July 19, 2010 12:24:48 PM They should have called black "the color you're not supposed to say" |
|
taylor_stone Male, 30-39, Eastern US
   2478 Posts
|
Monday, July 19, 2010 10:58:52 AM "You can BLEACH your anus?! You've got to be kidding....? Right?" Watch porn sometime and pay attention to the fact that anytime you see anal, the girls anus is pink. In reality, it would be darker, so they bleach the skin to make it look better. |
|
kittkatkatie Female, 18-29, Western US
   110 Posts
|
Monday, July 19, 2010 9:33:53 AM ahaha |
|
malinschen Female, 18-29, Europe
   448 Posts
|
Monday, July 19, 2010 7:44:40 AM You can BLEACH your anus?! You've got to be kidding....? Right? |
|
meepmaker Male, 30-39, Southern US
   6716 Posts
|
Monday, July 19, 2010 7:20:47 AM Love MJ 2008. |
|
belunan Male, 30-39, Western US
   1511 Posts
|
Monday, July 19, 2010 12:33:37 AM Where's the beige one called 'Color not entitled to be hired for internships for college grants under diversity funding' because if I were drawing a self pic atm, that'd be the one i need. |
|
BunnyNaku Female, 18-29, Midwest US
   5245 Posts
|
Monday, July 19, 2010 12:31:18 AM LOL |
|
IamBored29 Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   647 Posts
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010 6:49:51 PM I love how these internet fights start under the most random pictures... oh and LOL anal bleach. |
|
taylor_stone Male, 30-39, Eastern US
   2478 Posts
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010 2:32:59 PM LOL... And God knows IAB is a GREAT source of UNBIASED information... Now let's see them post 4Chan as a source and watch the entire credibility of Wikipedia disappear before our very eyes. |
|
Batmanners Male, 18-29, Canada
   4012 Posts
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010 12:03:41 PM Even I-A-B has been used as a source. --------------------------- "Eric's "Angry" emotion picture used for the web-cliché picture "l33t Cereal".[11]" 11^ "l33t Cereal". I Am Bored. http://www.i-am-bored.com/ bored_link.cfm?link_id=11137. Retrieved 2009-12-19. ---------------------------
|
|
Batmanners Male, 18-29, Canada
   4012 Posts
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010 12:00:31 PM Another note, before anything is added to a page, depending on the importance of the matter, it is usually thoroughly discussed in the "discussion" tab of the page, where moderators, users and admin can debate as to which information is pertinent enough to make the page, and which to omit. It is also the best place to post your ideas for information submission with reference, since someone else will do all the HTML work for you! Although, should you find a typo, you are completely allowed to, without asking, go to edit, and correct the typo. If you're right, no one will touch it, if you're wrong, it will be reverted back. On the very left, there are a bunch of buttons, one of which is recent changes, it shows you, real time, all the changes that have been done and to which page. Learn the site and how it works, and you realize it's not a random data assembly, it's an intricate ant hill with every human contributing to the cause. It's an amazing f |
|
Batmanners Male, 18-29, Canada
   4012 Posts
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010 11:52:54 AM Nice trolling there Shadowtube, you could have done it a little better. If you weren't trolling, you would qualify as one of the top tenth percentile on the internet who would qualify for: "most retarded drater on the web". Seriously, if you write incorrect info on wikipedia and expect it to remain unchanged... don't you feel, at least a little bit, like you're the reason you don't trust Wikipedia? If retards like you weren't out there vandalizing it, it would actually be even more reliable than it already is because moderators would have to spend less time fixing your drat-ups and more time updating and improving. I once made several changes to a page, but it was to delete "superfluous information" and "speculation". And it remained unchanged until data was provided to back-up the claims as being, in-fact, true. |
|
taylor_stone Male, 30-39, Eastern US
   2478 Posts
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010 11:02:51 AM Wow shadowtube... Way to go, ignoring all the intelligent posts beneath you... Wikipedia is a good source of info if the data on the Wiki page has a viable source. Your edit of the Star Trek page gets changed because you have no source for your info. How retarded are you? Oh wait... You're probably one of those "I know it all" middle school or high school brats... Wikipedia has been around since before you were old enough to know how to work a computer. And as for thinking it "trekkies" that change your posts, its NOT, fuucktard... Its the ridiculous amount of moderators that CHECK the data against the reference. If there's no reference for the change of data, they revert it back to the original post. So yes, Wikipedia IS a viable information source as long as the post has good reference sources (usually found on the bottom of the page). So stop thinking you know it all and go terrorize a mall with your friends... if you have any. |
|
Blakcat71388 Female, 18-29, Eastern US
   879 Posts
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010 7:55:50 AM lmao @ jschall |
|
IRockYeah Male, 30-39, Europe
   2141 Posts
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010 7:05:30 AM Wow Shadowtube. Talk about being anal |
|
shadowtube Male, 13-17, Canada
   253 Posts
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010 6:43:27 AM @jschall -It is Not a great source of info, last year i edited it to say Startrek was made in 1710, i hate when Star Trek nerds correct that. -Encyclopedia's are made by companys who do their work, They are correct, so yes you are supposed to use them as a source. -Don't ever use Wikipedia as a Source, at LEAST 40% of it is incorrect. -No it shouldn't, If Universities would take Wikipedia as a source, a lot of retards would beat college, an they want to teach the retards. -IT IS NOWHERE CLOSE to an amazing research tool. NOWHERE CLOSE! |
|
argon8 Male, 18-29, Australia
  61 Posts
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010 4:18:14 AM Despite the name, Gangrene has nothing to do with the color green. There can be some discoloration (blue or black for a superficial infection, red or bronze for a deep infection), but rarely green. No offense. And here's my source. P.S. Thank you, Jschall. You took the words right out of my mouth. I would only like to add that using Wikipedia as your source rather than Wikipedia's source brands you as lazy. I have absolutely no problem with using it properly. |
|
Batmanners Male, 18-29, Canada
   4012 Posts
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010 2:37:27 AM Damn, Jshall beat me to it. |
|
Batmanners Male, 18-29, Canada
   4012 Posts
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010 2:36:44 AM "There is a good reason why Wikipedia is not acceptable as a reference in any college or university in the country. " The fact that Wikipedia is based on quoting/citing where the facts comes from is the best way to use Wikipedia anyways. Rather than listing off the Wikipedia articles you used, simply use the links in the footnotes, should they be unavailable, that information in unverifiable, and therefore unreliable. Universities and Colleges are smart to disallow Wikipedia as a source, but if you use what sources Wikipedia, then the professor can know you didn't just edit the article to suit your needs. |
|
Page: 1 2 3 Next >
|