 OrangeCrow
Female, 18-29, Western US
 1208 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 16, 2010 4:04:18 AM
Wow, talk about hypocrisy. XD
Someone fat, stinky, and possibly a whore, bashing women and calling them whores for uh... Tugging on their own shirts?? Uhh am I reading that right?
Err hmm... Makes you wonder why the guy went through all the trouble to make a shirt for that reason. Weiiiird. |
|
 Dilluxia
Female, 18-29, Canada
240 Posts
|
Saturday, March 13, 2010 1:06:08 PM
If you can say "you are" then you use the apostrophe-- quite simple actually lol. "Your" is possessive.He also should have spelled it "women" lol. |
|
 JUGGALETTEx0
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
1361 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 7:21:28 PM
everything but the apostrophe... |
|
 Papaija
Male, 18-29, Europe
91 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 1:38:58 PM
Holy poo he's even got a comma there :0 |
|
JUGGALETTEx0
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
1361 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:35:41 AM
actually he didn't use the correct for because, now correct me if I'm wrong but, youre is not a word...it's you're with an APOSTROPHE. |
|
 sweetdaddyD
Male, 18-29, Southern US
13 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:17:45 AM
kewlbetti where on that shirt does it say They're stinking whores? it doesn't maybe you should learn to read before you go accusing someone of wrong grammar! |
|
 buxco215
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
982 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:36:14 AM
KOZOK is a palindrome @_@ |
|
 gorgack2000
Male, 13-17, Europe
4702 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:20:45 AM
"I hope you were joking fatex51986 - he should have used THEY'RE - as in "THEY ARE STINKING "WHORES "
He's not joking and he has a better grasp at grammar then you by the looks of it. |
|
 davymid
Male, 30-39, Europe
11681 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 8:50:16 AM
kewlbetti. Dangerous thing, correcting someone over the internet. There's always the danger of coming across as being retarded. |
|
 SumRandom1
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
795 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 8:36:15 AM
dude i totally feel what your saying, stinkin whores their are all |
|
Flashman07
Male, 18-29, Europe
8 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 7:43:57 AM
kewlbetti - FAIL! 'Women who pull on they are shirts are stinking whores' doesnt make any sense does it? 'Their' was used correctly in this circumstance. |
|
 kewlbetti
Female, 30-39, Southern US
62 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 6:39:31 AM
"well at least he used the proper form of the word their"I hope you were joking fatex51986 - he should have used THEY'RE - as in "THEY ARE STINKING "WHORES |
|
 xxPinkxx
Female, 18-29, Canada
3842 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 6:25:29 AM
Hmm. 'you're' signals better spelling then ive seen on the internet all week. I feel the urge to buy him mcdonalds and give him a job. |
|
 BunnyNaku
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
5245 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 6:22:07 AM
.. |
|
66stang
Male, 18-29, Western US
226 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 1:00:13 AM
that's the fattest homeless guy I've ever seen |
|
 MrTwidget
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
746 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:29:59 AM
Way to think it out first. |
|
 fatex52986
Male, 18-29, Western US
1135 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 11:33:15 PM
well at least he used the proper form of the word their |
|
 DarkFerret
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
2764 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 9:56:17 PM
Kozok no like woman with shirt on!!! lol |
|
 5Cats
Male, 40-49, Canada
16953 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:00:46 PM
@SomeShoes - Stay back young fellah! This takes an experienced boobie-watcher! Those things could go off without warning!
@SmilinSam - Well, see, it's all about... um... gee, I'm crazy, but not THAT crazy! idk-wtf-omg! |
|
 SmilinSam
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
3603 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 7:31:03 PM
what does he mean by pull on their shirts? like pull on as in get dressed or pull on as in like, adjusting or raising/lowering their shirts? i'm actually curious about this. |
|
Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
9546 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 7:11:13 PM
Angillon, would you still have screwed up the "woman"-"women" thing?
Very unlikely, other than as a weird mistake. The difference between singular and plural is quite clear. Using 'woman' as an adjective irritates me too, e.g. 'woman doctor'. That's another common mistake. It's a noun, not an adjective. Not even similar. At best, 'woman doctor' is a clumsy way to refer to someone who doctors women. I wouldn't use that sort of phrasing anyway, because it's treating women as a special case rather than as normal (who talks about 'men doctors' and why pay such attention to a doctor's sex anyway?) |
|
 Batmanners
Male, 18-29, Canada
4012 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:11:03 PM
Angillon, would you still have screwed up the "woman"-"women" thing? |
|
 Handsompod
Male, 30-39, Europe
1105 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 4:35:10 PM
Ah, of course you would. My mistake. LOL |
|
Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
9546 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:41:02 PM
He makes a compelling argument, so elloquent in his delivery of irrefutable well documented research. Angillion, is that you?
No way! I would have correctly used an apostrophe in you're. |
|
 SunnyNphilly
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
645 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:13:25 PM
I don't get it, did he just figure out all women are whores? |
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}