 gothgirl69
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
 425 Posts
|
Friday, January 22, 2010 4:28:42 PM
dude look at her arms, shes way under weight, no muscle mass at all. |
|
 cagel
Female, 18-29, Western US
277 Posts
|
Friday, January 22, 2010 1:38:58 PM
Did you bother to understand what a readymade is? Or who Duchamp is?Your satire may not be good art, but your rhetoric and method was an artistic one. You're an ignoramus, dude. You try to turn my own statements against me when you have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about, clearly. If you bothered to know what art is, maybe you wouldn't be so quick to criticize. |
|
 almightybob1
Male, 18-29, Europe
4278 Posts
|
Friday, January 22, 2010 8:04:09 AM
also, almightybob1, by positioning that snow-screen photo and positioning it with a mock explanation, you have just made art.Look up Duchamp's readymades. You just made a readymade. You just made art. Now, couldn't that be fun and exhilarating rather than cynical and destructive?
If you're seriously going to label a random picture of white noise plus me making up crap about it 'art', then I think you just helped prove my point. |
|
 Shahar102
Female, 18-29, Europe
518 Posts
|
Friday, January 22, 2010 7:43:22 AM
AWESOME SHOESCould be great without the table there.. |
|
 KRAYZEEGIRL
Female, 30-39, Eastern US
445 Posts
|
Friday, January 22, 2010 2:10:33 AM
Gives a whole new meaning to "That dress looks like a tablecloth" |
|
alynn
Female, 18-29, Southern US
25 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:47:36 PM
Oh you know. If you throw it on the runway it's considered eccentric. Let's just hope she didn't fall ;) |
|
 proof1221
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
696 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:07:36 PM
titanic survivor? |
|
 Shaboobalah
Male, 18-29, Canada
329 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 7:11:53 PM
lolwut? |
|
 MountainBord
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
1898 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 5:36:59 PM
hahaha Angel |
|
 BunnyNaku
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
5245 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14:08 PM
it looked nice till I scrolled down more to see the table. |
|
 inaria
Female, 18-29, Canada
1512 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:10:14 PM
Without the table it's a pretty nice outfit x) |
|
 Angelmassb
Male, 18-29, S. America
15474 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:59:30 PM
They are going with the "Hurricane Survivor" theme |
|
 haunt
Female, 13-17, Europe
646 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:31:04 PM
brings a whole new meaning to snacking on the go, doesn't it? |
|
MountainBord
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
1898 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:20:48 PM
a trend is a general way that something is developing.... so true art can create a trend, not everything is about FASHION magazines..
and this is not a trend, its a lame phenomenon |
|
 jadedtortois
Female, 18-29, Canada
779 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:13:19 PM
Fashion is about art, art is expression. Trends on the other hand are picked out by magazines. Know the difference. |
|
MountainBord
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
1898 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:01:38 PM
its the practicallity of it all.. its a skirt, AND a table for a improv party, game of cards.. or even to have an enjoyable breakfast on the go. |
|
 Trumple07
Male, 13-17, Europe
425 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 2:09:32 PM
The word 'fashion' means trend, am I right?
The last time I looked down my street, I did not see people wearing fk'in tables!
There is no trend towards wearing tables,
It is not fashion. It's insanity. |
|
 Jazzycakes
Male, 18-29, Australia
217 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:45:38 PM
Mmmmm a stir of contravesy (spelled that one out in my head ha ha), It's good seeing the human mind constantly sliding over the barriers of conformity.Now if only somoene can make a girl wrapped in a super nintendo then my day would be set xD |
|
cagel
Female, 18-29, Western US
277 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:24:03 PM
Too much money and time? Jealous much? It's pretty hilarious to me how worked up people get over art they don't understand. |
|
 fancylady
Female, 30-39, Canada
870 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:30:03 AM
This is not Modern Art. It is Contemporary art. Maybe if you were educated on the subject you would be able to understand it.this is not any kind of "art" it is just ridiculous crap made by someone with too much money and time . |
|
 imyownpeople
Female, 18-29, Western US
164 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:27:16 AM
Its f-uckin fashion people
Get over yourselves. |
|
 leesah
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
1577 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:21:11 AM
"Also note the even spread of black and white - a powerful message about the anti-apartheid movement, wouldn't you agree?"...uhm, that's one of those "magic eye" pictures, not just static. Although I can't seem to figure it out, it looks like some random squares. |
|
 xDousenx
Male, 13-17, Eastern US
144 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:17:03 AM
Ugh people who get to technical with stuff. As shown below...
Oh and on another note.... I call this one after the hurricane. |
|
cagel
Female, 18-29, Western US
277 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 10:35:46 AM
also, almightybob1, by positioning that snow-screen photo and positioning it with a mock explanation, you have just made art.Look up Duchamp's readymades. You just made a readymade. You just made art. Now, couldn't that be fun and exhilarating rather than cynical and destructive? |
|
cagel
Female, 18-29, Western US
277 Posts
|
Thursday, January 21, 2010 10:30:34 AM
almightybob1: using a model for that possible rhetoric (it could be a totally wrong reading) is not hypocrisy, but rather as a way of drawing the rhetoric directly on fashion. The model is the woman, the woman and the table are the same. Fashion is the focal point rather than the wearer. Just because you don't like my reading doesn't mean I'm grasping. I'm using methods of analysis that you have clearly never learned. Your ignorance does not negate the possibility of rhetoric. |
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}