 cacacaca500
Male, 13-17, Europe
 92 Posts
|
Monday, December 21, 2009 3:44:04 PM
haha, they'll say anything to sell, and people have probably bought those sunglassess! LMAO |
|
 marcos_g45
Male, 13-17, S. America
46 Posts
|
Sunday, December 20, 2009 2:02:03 PM
touche @theforrest lol |
|
 theforrest
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
120 Posts
|
Thursday, December 17, 2009 4:12:12 PM
@Fimbulvetr: almost as "retarded" as you are for misspelling your insult. |
|
k10josumm
Male, 18-29, Western US
432 Posts
|
Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:59:33 AM
there's no such thing as false advertisement anymore folks. laws too fu*ked up. |
|
 adaedwar
Male, 18-29, Southern US
192 Posts
|
Monday, December 14, 2009 11:46:27 PM
Well it shields 100% UV that hits the product... Mine don't block what doesn't hit the actual glass. Stupid mistake but if they had good lawyers (which they do) then it's airtight against anyone who challenges it. |
|
 lukeforv123
Male, 18-29, Western US
893 Posts
|
Monday, December 14, 2009 8:43:36 PM
That is soooooooo funny, I can't stop laughing. not
|
|
Fimbulvetr
Male, 13-17, Western US
12 Posts
|
Monday, December 14, 2009 7:22:56 PM
I've seen teens my age actually wear these.
they look so retarted in them, it's almost amazing. |
|
 idiotfilter
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
3934 Posts
|
Monday, December 14, 2009 3:06:22 PM
broken... |
|
 Nurcowski
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
264 Posts
|
Monday, December 14, 2009 12:22:28 AM
what they meant to say was: shields some UV rays 100% of the time |
|
 OmgZelda
Female, 18-29, Canada
1600 Posts
|
Sunday, December 13, 2009 11:56:14 PM
LOL |
|
 Aretsuku-kun
Male, 13-17, Canada
309 Posts
|
Sunday, December 13, 2009 8:21:18 PM
Disney has the greatest sunglasses of all time! |
|
 SoapeyLOV
Female, 13-17, Eastern US
89 Posts
|
Sunday, December 13, 2009 1:30:30 PM
FAIL |
|
 Antonin
Male, 18-29, Southern US
73 Posts
|
Sunday, December 13, 2009 10:18:37 AM
I asked them about it, they said that it was magic... ooooooh. |
|
 Freyr108
Male, 18-29, Europe
192 Posts
|
Sunday, December 13, 2009 10:18:26 AM
maybe that does refer to protection for the eyes, maybe it has a special coating, protecting the pastic from uv rays XD |
|
 CHICOMIMI
Female, 18-29, Western US
928 Posts
|
Sunday, December 13, 2009 10:09:21 AM
Now I know where all the wannabe rappers get their sades... |
|
skite111
Male, 30-39, Midwest US
99 Posts
|
Sunday, December 13, 2009 8:57:44 AM
What DOES Disney not get about science? |
|
 IRockYeah
Male, 30-39, Europe
2141 Posts
|
Sunday, December 13, 2009 8:04:59 AM
I cant for the life of me figure out who would wear those type of shades after they were made more famous by the master douchebag Kanye "imma let you finish" West |
|
 almightybob1
Male, 18-29, Europe
4278 Posts
|
Sunday, December 13, 2009 3:41:56 AM
LIIIIEEEES. That's like at MOST 40% UV protection.
I dunno opie, it looks like half the lens bit is covered by the alternating pattern. 50% UV protection maybe?And the self-appointed grammar Nazis in this thread are wrong.
What doesn't Disney not get about science? Double negative, so the real question is:
What does Disney get about science? Answer: Nothing. No grammar problem there. |
|
xLelouch
Male, 18-29, Western US
6 Posts
|
Sunday, December 13, 2009 2:51:04 AM
@strangergoat ahhhahahaha i noticed that too lulz |
|
 strangergoat
Female, 18-29, Australia
591 Posts
|
Sunday, December 13, 2009 12:17:47 AM
Double negative in the title? Confusing. |
|
 xxPinkxx
Female, 18-29, Canada
3842 Posts
|
Saturday, December 12, 2009 11:20:08 PM
lol bunnienaku. i agree. |
|
 luvsushi
Female, 18-29, Southern US
172 Posts
|
Saturday, December 12, 2009 9:19:34 PM
*snicker* |
|
 BunnyNaku
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
5245 Posts
|
Saturday, December 12, 2009 7:17:11 PM
im surprised hannah montana isnt on that tag |
|
 GuardinGnome
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
2900 Posts
|
Saturday, December 12, 2009 7:14:16 PM
Those shades are so F**king stupid. |
|
 Cajun247
Male, 18-29, Southern US
9438 Posts
|
Saturday, December 12, 2009 7:08:32 PM
Even more reasons why I don't like Disney. |
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}