I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
LatestPopularMost BookmarkedMost EmailedTop RatedMy FavoritesRandomChat
AllGamesFunnyEntertainmentQuizzesWeirdTechLifestyle, Arts & Lit.News & PoliticsScienceSportsMisc
Submit Content  





rss

friendsmore friends | add your site
Asylum

Holy Taco

Funny Videos

BuzzFeed

NothingToxic

Oddee

Mousebreaker

Online Games

Eat Liver

Online Games

Gorilla Mask

Full Downloads

Norway Games

Damn Cool Pics

Kontraband

Extreme Humor

X Hollywood

I Dont Like You

123 Games

Hollywoodtuna

Funny Games

Cool Stuff

Viva La Games

X - Vids

Smit Happens

Funny Videos

Funny Stuff

ebaumsworld



Back to Listing

See, Not All Political Protesters Are Bad [Pic]

Hits: 32126 | Rating: (2.6) | Category: News & Politics | Added by: fancylad
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next >   Jump to: Bottom    Last Post
eggsnham
Male, 13-17, Eastern US
 1147 Posts
Saturday, February 27, 2010 2:06:32 PM
Lonely girl, I honestly think that you're the only one who really cares. Face it, men are the more visual gender and there are plenty of woman who have found that it's very easy to use this to their advantage. Yelling at guys for getting excited about a couple of good looking women is like yelling at a bird for flying. And honestly, sex is a part of everyday life, if you can't handle that, then look at a future as a nun. On a side note, feminism is pretty much useless nowadays, seeing that women have the same amount or more rights than men, (in the U.S.) and women can sue big corporations for getting paid less than any given male counterpart etc. Not that I disagree with this, I'm just saying, feminists need to stop screaming "Sexist!" at every little thing. If the rant made little to no sense, it's because you are refusing to see facts, or because I'm tired :P

Lonley_girl
Female, 13-17, Canada
 138 Posts
Thursday, December 03, 2009 7:08:07 PM
Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
1547 Posts

even if he's not, he still screams creepy old man, whose bitter about life


screwzlooose
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
 377 Posts
Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:33:16 AM
Angillion... doesn't this sound like objectification to you? And really, if ur correct in ur thinking that sexuality is an acceptable means of getting ur message across, then, as a 14 year old female, i'll make sure next time i need to talk to a male teacher about a mark, i'll wear a low cut top and lean over as i speak. Because as your saying, that would be totally acceptable because i'll be getting what i want. correct? Thanks, I'll deffinately take into consideration that this is what 40 year old males want me to do.


hon- 1. he's 18-29. 2. yes, it is. 3 sorry you have to find out on the internet.

dont stop fighting, i guess. but to be honest, complaining about mens' behavior isn't gonna change our behavior.


Lonley_girl
Female, 13-17, Canada
 138 Posts
Sunday, November 29, 2009 11:07:31 AM
"yea i could definitley get behind them... and on top of them, under em, and in their faces too :D"

Angillion... doesn't this sound like objectification to you? And really, if ur correct in ur thinking that sexuality is an acceptable means of getting ur message across, then, as a 14 year old female, i'll make sure next time i need to talk to a male teacher about a mark, i'll wear a low cut top and lean over as i speak. Because as your saying, that would be totally acceptable because i'll be getting what i want. correct? Thanks, I'll deffinately take into consideration that this is what 40 year old males want me to do.


ShadowDD13
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 261 Posts
Wednesday, November 25, 2009 11:56:05 PM
yea i could definitley get behind them... and on top of them, under em, and in their faces too :D

Ninja-Nerd
Male, 18-29, Australia
 139 Posts
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 2:44:52 AM
If my History classes taught me anything:

Democracy is a political system

Yet Capitalism is an economic system.

There's no way in hell that they're equal.


WyattErb
Male, 18-29, Canada
 17 Posts
Monday, November 23, 2009 4:03:27 PM
If I was in charge you'd all be slaves.

eggsnham
Male, 13-17, Eastern US
 1147 Posts
Monday, November 23, 2009 1:37:32 PM
"elf, are you retarded? History proves it: Capitalism=win, socialism=fail. Everybody thinks they can do it right. None have yet."

Pure Capitalism= Greedy men, who would chop off their right nut for money and put children to work in terrible conditions.

Pure Socialism= Equality for everyone in every way for better or worse.

Pure Socialism won't work, the same as pure Capitalism won't work, America is about 85% Capitalism. America as a country is beginning to fall apart. Now what we should be doing, is what many European countries are doing and try to balance between Socialist and Capitalist ideas. But because Americans as a people are stubborn and ignorant when in groups (sometimes individually) I couldn't see that happening, this is why I plan to move to Canada.


xavroche
Male, 30-39, Europe
 814 Posts
Monday, November 23, 2009 12:47:34 PM
@seneca22:
Saying that America is not a democracy is as incorrect as saying that it is. The fact of the matter is that to argue whether or not America is a democracy is completely pointless unless you first define what a democracy is. The problem is no universal and absolute definition of a democracy exists. One thing is certain, America is not a direct democracy. However, I would argue that under most definitions, America qualifies in broad terms as a representative democracy, a liberal democracy and more specifically has often been referenced as a republican democracy or a democratic republic. Being so black and white as to say that it is incorrect to call the US a democracy and that one should call it a republic is a misunderstanding of paradigms in political theory. They are loose categories, often varying substantially depending on which author you read, that often overlap and are not as mutually exclusive as you would make them seem...

thevssranger
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 89 Posts
Monday, November 23, 2009 9:18:24 AM
oh yeah, look at the fannie.

thevssranger
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 89 Posts
Monday, November 23, 2009 9:09:01 AM
damn right I could get behind those girls.

Seneca22
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
 35 Posts
Monday, November 23, 2009 9:05:03 AM
Fatex52986... "What the hell do you think a republic is? Its a representative democracy. i swear people dont pay attention in school..."

Oh really? I think it is a constitional republic. And you would be aware that most educational texts refer to the American government as a Democracy only. Our Founding Fathers instituted a form of government guided by the rule of law rather than the desires of a majority of voters. They understood that a democracy is always in flux and given to “mob rule,” while a republic is fixed and stable, resting on “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.” Many of the references to America as a democracy are harmless, being made out of ignorance by people who are just repeating what they were told in grade school or on the evening news, some of the references betray a desire to change the very fabric of the nation.


RedAftrshock
Male, 18-29, Europe
 163 Posts
Monday, November 23, 2009 6:57:14 AM
Extreme Socialism = hot chicks? Although I'd rather just take the latter, if the laws of maths must be upheld I'll do both of them....

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11508 Posts
Monday, November 23, 2009 3:49:29 AM
Think about it, in a true 100% government ran country,

Is anyone advocating this? If not, your argument is made of straw.

I was watching The Apprentice UK last night. The UK is far more "socialist" than anyone is advocating for the USA. Sir Alan Sugar started with £150, flogging cheap stuff from a council flat. He's built that up to about £800M. So what's that about "socialism" again?


DuckBoy87
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
 2681 Posts
Monday, November 23, 2009 12:15:41 AM
Selfishness and greed are bad things, yes.
However they are the only means that actually initiate productivity, creativity, and motivation.

Think about it, in a true 100% government ran country, they could tell you to produce an electric spatula, a completely useless device, and you have no say whatsoever. No one would try to better the device because more than likely the idea will get turned down. And if the government told everyone that they will get $50,000 a year, no matter what they did, well I'm going sit on my butt and watch my flat screen, eat popcorn, and play video games all day.

A guy came into my store the other day, and started playing scratch offs. He said he didn't care if he lost because it wasn't his money, and it was going back to the government. AKA, he's on welfare/SS/disability/etc spending it on lotto.

If the US goes to a true socialism, then more people like him are going to pop out of the woodworks because they can benefit from laziness.


Edgarska19
Male, 18-29, Western US
 1052 Posts
Sunday, November 22, 2009 10:39:52 PM
socialism is good, but people have been doing it wrong

Angilion
Male, 40-49, Europe
 11508 Posts
Sunday, November 22, 2009 10:26:01 PM
elf, are you retarded? History proves it: Capitalism=win, socialism=fail. Everybody thinks they can do it right. None have yet.

The closest I know of to a capitalist state ever existing in reality would be early feudal England, in which 90% of people didn't even own themselves and were very lucky if they lived to 40. Even that wasn't pure capitalism, because the serfs had some labour rights.

If you have pure capitalism, you have pure oppression in a totally rigid class structure. Rich = nobility, poor = commoners. A bit less capitalism gives a slight amount of class mobility.

The opposite to capitalism is communism, not socialism. Socialism is neither extreme.


RyanHake
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 2698 Posts
Sunday, November 22, 2009 9:37:16 PM
I'll take the one on the right please and thank you

BrutahSka
Male, 18-29, Canada
 46 Posts
Sunday, November 22, 2009 5:05:53 PM
you drew up some pictures...good for you.

BroadwayLove
Female, 18-29, Southern US
 191 Posts
Sunday, November 22, 2009 5:02:05 PM
America is not a democracy...just sayin.

SaltyVarnish
Male, 18-29, Australia
 680 Posts
Sunday, November 22, 2009 2:21:30 PM
gooooooooooo denim!

Abacab2112
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 432 Posts
Sunday, November 22, 2009 10:54:53 AM
ImmortalZach
Male, 13-17, Eastern US
423 Posts Saturday, November 21, 2009
Im with Abacab2112 on this one, capitalism has nothing to do with democracy, corporatism does though and that can happen in any economic system. And we haven't seen real capitalism since the 20's so quit complaining, and enjoy this "great" welfare state you wanted so bad or move to Europe.
--------------
And even in the 20's, we had socialized police, courts, etc. There were a lot of regulations placed on the market, though not as many as today. I admire Calvin Coolidge and Warren Harding for their reduction of intervention in the economy, but he still let prohibition go on.

Corporatism doesn't exist in ANY economy system, by the way. It can only exist in statism, where the government has a legal possibility for violence. The only answer is to privatize all means of production, including defense. But I only have 125 characters left, so if someone wants me to explain THAT, I'll use a


AkaHikage
Male, 18-29, Southern US
 51 Posts
Sunday, November 22, 2009 10:53:18 AM
Anarchy is the only way to go.

Abacab2112
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 432 Posts
Sunday, November 22, 2009 10:51:45 AM
RecycleElf
Male, 13-17, Europe

Lets just gatter around with pitch-forks and torches to hunt down and violently kill DuckBoy87

Capitalism is selfish. Society will end on it's knees in unfairness and burn. Socialisme makes society work together for a common purpose and as i see it, only bring it up. how can people NOT go for something that in total will benefit EVERYONE? because they are greedy. greeeeeeeed my frieinds are the two enemies! as displayed by these two hot girls with posters :)
---------------
Well, it depends on what kind of socialism you want: statist socialism or anarcho-socialism. Statist socialism is incredibly greedy because the bureaucracy involved and the oligopolies created cause enormous shifts of wealth that would never happen with solely the will of the people. Anarcho-socialism is somewhat voluntary, but it restricts people by excluding capitalism. An anarcho-capitalist/voluntaryist society would allow people to be socialist if they want to.


S1nc3ra
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 2 Posts
Sunday, November 22, 2009 8:39:14 AM
I'm sorry recycleelf if i think a brain surgeon should make mucher more than cashier, or someone who starts a company should make more than his employees, he had the initiative

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next > 

You Must be Signed in to Add a Comment

If you've already got an I-Am-Bored.com account,
click here to sign in.

If you don't have an account yet,
Click Here to Create a Free Account
 

Back to Listing ^top


Bored | Suggest a Link | Advertise | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.