 ravenclaw94
Female, 13-17, Eastern US
 135 Posts
|
Friday, September 25, 2009 4:48:19 PM
I don't know what this means, but in a few years when I equations like this, I'm going to get a tatto of one. |
|
 JoeJordan
Male, 18-29, Europe
233 Posts
|
Tuesday, July 21, 2009 4:32:30 AM
OMG what a nub XD. |
|
 Xutar
Male, 13-17, Midwest US
158 Posts
|
Saturday, June 27, 2009 12:39:33 PM
Am I the only one who knows what this is? Its the longhand-summation proof that the Riemann Zeta Function's fractal structure approximates any other analytic complex fuction (that satisfies the Cauchy-Riemann conditions) given it doesn't have any zeros on the critical line (1/2 + it). |
|
 hyybrucewayn
Male, 18-29, Western US
203 Posts
|
Thursday, May 28, 2009 12:18:38 PM
its the equation to predict when he will lose his virginity |
|
twitchy11B
Male, 18-29, Western US
125 Posts
|
Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:24:45 AM
so Tangello, i will have to take your word that its all done right. i gess the beauty if it is that a very small percent of the country is ever going to be able to tell. and i am not one of them. |
|
 tangello
Female, 13-17, Western US
898 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:06:03 PM
at least the tattoo artist didn't get it wrong! i get long equations wrong in PENCIL ><" |
|
 Paul1582
Male, 13-17, Midwest US
674 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 5:54:26 PM
I bet 42 is tattooed on his buttcheeks. |
|
 npdarren
Male, 18-29, Western US
603 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 5:50:11 PM
I recognize the last part of the equation eo=({ra)} from my physics text book. The rest is gibberish to me. Maybe it is like that rumored equation that predicts the future... |
|
 reidcook1000
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
384 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:21:52 PM
tan line ftw |
|
 Tonyjet
Male, 18-29, Western US
3430 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 2:28:49 PM
yeah is probably something ridiculous as 1 per say
|
|
 MetalicDemon
Male, 18-29, Europe
1712 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 1:37:52 PM
sad sad man... |
|
dudeman1234
Male, 13-17, Eastern US
71 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 11:49:24 AM
its the question THE question. the questions awnser is the meaning of life, the universe,and every thing. the awnser is..............................................................................42!! |
|
 RckThsPrty
Female, 13-17, Europe
268 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 11:41:25 AM
42 |
|
 pyrojen27
Female, 18-29, Southern US
22 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 10:24:54 AM
Ha ha awesome |
|
littleyoyo
Male, 18-29, S. America
57 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 10:03:42 AM
judging by the complexity of the formula...the answer is 0...or 1...or doesn't exist...stupid answers never exist... |
|
Raphael_Russ
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
11 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:23:50 AM
bur what does it really mean...? |
|
 Angelmassb
Male, 18-29, S. America
15474 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:52:44 AM
That is the equation to prove God doesnt exist |
|
 freddyferret
Male, 40-49, Midwest US
9911 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:34:09 AM
Wow, that is just pathetic. |
|
 panth753
Female, 18-29, Midwest US
8225 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:33:02 AM
And the answer to this is... pi!!! |
|
 Berenice
Female, 13-17, Western US
540 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 5:39:17 AM
I'm going Appy Fizzo. |
|
 shepherd
Male, 30-39, Europe
136 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 5:39:02 AM
Spam Spam Spam Spam Spam Spam Spam Spam Spam Spam there's so much SPAM
|
|
 Epicasaurus
Male, 13-17, Australia
42 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 5:20:11 AM
I'm fairly sure something is can be like that, given enough motivation.
Also, spammers ahoy! |
|
 JJXanadu
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
517 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 4:44:03 AM
"how can you multiply against an uncertainty such as the wave-function?"Wave functions aren't uncertainties, just mathematical tools used to study physical systems. Actually, in order to find the probability that a system is in a certain state, you (basically) multiply the wave function by itself. |
|
JJXanadu
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
517 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 4:35:27 AM
It's a good thing I didn't do this tattoo... I tend to mix up my signs :) |
|
JJXanadu
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
517 Posts
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 4:34:09 AM
@idolmonkeyYou'll re-learn the basics if you continue studying physics in college, so what's wrong with trying to inspire a few students with a glimpse at what physics can be used to do? My problem in high school was the exact opposite. My teachers were so short sighted that they didn't care (or know) how what I was learning would apply to my future studies. I think it's better for a teacher to set their expectations high, and have the students fall a little short than to set the bar too low. |
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}