RobSwindol Male, 30-39, Southern US
   2035 Posts
|
Saturday, May 09, 2009 5:54:50 AM "Is it just me, or do all giant robot battles in recent years take place in San Francisco?"That could have something to do with the fact that Lucas films is in the Bay Area and has some of the best technology to make these types of films. Not to mention the fact that because New York City was once the center of Attention in nearly every blockbuster film, it now costs an arm and a leg to shoot there. |
|
pat125 Male, 18-29, Western US
   744 Posts
|
Saturday, May 09, 2009 12:38:37 AM Great CGI and effects up until the point of the explosion, which was kind of dull in comparison to everything else. |
|
odeed Male, 18-29, Australia
   452 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 10:48:23 PM Also, who ever made out that the Enterprise was this powerful thing, that could never be destroyed? It was constantly being screwed over, every damn episode, that doesn't make it less awesome. |
|
odeed Male, 18-29, Australia
   452 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 10:45:34 PM Stak Trek was awesome, better than any of the Star Wars films of the last 15 years. |
|
angrytick Male, 13-17, Canada
   197 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 10:01:58 PM star wars ftw |
|
Joolin Male, 18-29, Western US
   1004 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 9:51:23 PM Is it just me, or do all giant robot battles in recent years take place in San Francisco? |
|
LordNick Male, 18-29, Western US
   284 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 9:02:07 PM what they didn't show is when Janeway and voyager took out the deathstar and the borg assimilated the storm troopers |
|
Pindragon Male, 18-29, Midwest US
   581 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 8:48:54 PM Could have been a better explosion, but I love how it is made to almost be realistic. (especially the death star) |
|
cannibal151 Male, 18-29, Western US
   1617 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 8:08:23 PM Lol wow, enterprise just got dominated. Kind of a overkill though, the Death Star's Death Ray is meant to destroy planets, not pooty space ships. |
|
Smashking Male, 18-29, Western US
   775 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 7:43:28 PM It'd be a better fight with Death Star and the Borg cube. Falcon and Enterprise would probably be more entertaining. |
|
tehsusenoh Male, 13-17, Midwest US
 31 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 6:30:43 PM "fake"No, really. /sarcasm |
|
oxyl Male, 30-39, Canada
   919 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 5:07:13 PM fake |
|
Discomonkey Male, 13-17, Europe
   1385 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 5:02:04 PM I prefer Star Wars over Star Trek, 'cept its more like I care a little less about Star Trek than Star Wars."Well thats clearly impossible..." Well I just watched a video that proved other wise so ha...
|
|
Quackor Male, 18-29, S. America
   2666 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 4:11:25 PM wouldnt the obvious battle be between the millennium falcon vs the enterprise? i think this is stupid |
|
zarteck Male, 13-17, Midwest US
 36 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 4:09:25 PM lol... death star rocks!! |
|
ryan99 Male, 13-17, Western US
   2349 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 3:52:46 PM I remember there was like a TON of these star wars in real life videos like a year or two ago. |
|
opiebreath Female, 18-29, Midwest US
   16061 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 3:45:44 PM Here, let me throw in my two cents about the current discussion.
Two cents thrown. |
|
RyanF701 Male, 18-29, Western US
   2558 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 3:39:16 PM " Well thats clearly impossible. Star wars use high powered lasers, while star trek uses Phasers, which as you all should know are stupidly more powerful, so lasers wouldn't even knock the shields down to 99% as shown on an episode of TNG (forgot which one =[). *nerd rant over*"I've never really watched either Star Trek or Starwars, but, how can you compare two fictional things that don't exist in eachothers world? |
|
fnkychkn Female, 40-49, Eastern US
   862 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 3:31:38 PM They made one mistake: the Enterprise can't enter the atmosphere; it would burn up. Wait, I'm not a nerd; how'd I know that??!! ***sigh*** |
|
SamVimes Male, 30-39, Eastern US
   619 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 3:30:57 PM Kind of like using a sledgehammer to smash an ant. Wasn't the Death Star designed to destroy planets? Not that I'm a nerd and care about this kind of stuff. Cough. |
|
Nidonemo Male, 18-29, Western US
   9216 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 3:19:06 PM Oh god we are NOT having a nerd argument here. We are DEFINITELY NOT having a NERD FANBOY ARGUMENT HERE! |
|
dairy Male, 18-29, Europe
   383 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 3:16:22 PM whats the difference between phasers and lasers then? and dont bother if some stupid fictional nerd reason, despite this entire thing being about being fictional and nerdy |
|
xiquiripat Male, 18-29, Western US
   2419 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 2:31:55 PM Ha! That was pretty good. |
|
Ches47 Male, 18-29, Eastern US
   303 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 2:30:47 PM The second Death Star was able to shoot a lower level energy weapon capable of destroying capital ships. Who posted that BS about it not doing any damage... keep dreaming kid. |
|
simim23 Female, 18-29, Southern US
   1435 Posts
|
Friday, May 08, 2009 2:00:40 PM ... and then the Borg Cube comes in and assimilates the Death Star. |
|