 hairbands
Female, 13-17, Western US
 24 Posts
|
Monday, March 09, 2009 9:33:13 PM
oh shet thats really sad tsk tsk |
|
 JacobTrue13
Male, 18-29, Europe
239 Posts
|
Monday, March 09, 2009 1:24:00 PM
I understood NONE of that. |
|
 grahamm
Male, 18-29, Europe
245 Posts
|
Monday, March 09, 2009 11:42:50 AM
i wish i knew anything about poker |
|
 dairy
Male, 18-29, Europe
383 Posts
|
Monday, March 09, 2009 7:25:42 AM
well...kind of not, dude, you may have taken that a little far. and cliched. plus jessica biel is butters >.> |
|
 Zerocyde
Male, 18-29, Western US
3279 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 11:39:46 PM
Watching poker is the lamest thing in the world. Playing it is fun, but watching it makes watching golf look like watching two eagles fight to the death with ninja swords in mid air from the wing of a jet fighter with a naked Jessica Biel blocking half of your view. |
|
 Gr1mCalavera
Male, 18-29, Australia
26 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 9:06:56 PM
and that's why I hate playing poker... |
|
 Ninjakunai2
Male, 13-17, Western US
220 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 6:37:03 PM
I kinda wish I could understand poker... |
|
osiron23
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
1 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 5:44:05 PM
Wrong. He'd also be beat by AA. |
|
 JoeYC
Male, 18-29, Europe
725 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 5:17:29 PM
Glasses on poker is to stop people who can pick up the slightest signs from people from working out what you have.he had 99.645737% chance of a win from the flop.
The only hand that could beat him was the A, 10. the chances of someone having that is slim, especially with 1 other player in the hand any poker player would of played exactly like that, no one is going to fold to that. (coding a poker bot at the moment and know poker very well) |
|
 Ivo87
Male, 18-29, Europe
41 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 4:31:48 PM
why is this in IAB? there are tons of movies of these kind of "bad beats" on youtube or whatever. this one isn't an exception. |
|
 murrymalty
Male, 18-29, Europe
2904 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 3:35:21 PM
thts sux, he had a full house 10 & A on the first hand, and he loses |
|
 Quackor
Male, 18-29, S. America
2665 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 12:09:41 PM
poker players who use dark glasses are lame, that should be banned |
|
 JimboH
Male, 30-39, Southern US
601 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 11:31:44 AM
I'm no poker expert, but I've watched enough to believe that many (if not most) people would've been knocked out with that Full House [10, 10, 10, A, A]. I mean, you're just not gonna lose with that 99.9% of the time. That's why the commentators called it a "disaster" from the start, before anybody even bet. |
|
 Bo_SHhaYeB
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
272 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 10:12:22 AM
playing without thinking = gambling .. I think other played would have gave more thinking |
|
 freddyferret
Male, 40-49, Midwest US
9843 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 8:53:09 AM
Wow that sucks. He had a great hand, just not great enough. He did the right thing, he just got screwed with bad luck. There was only one hand that would have beaten him with the cards on the table and the other guy had it. |
|
 Spearman113
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
208 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 8:13:52 AM
"Those are paris hilton numbers"lmao |
|
 almightybob1
Male, 18-29, Europe
4278 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 7:58:59 AM
s0rd3dvisi1on: Bollocks. With a full house on the flop, you would have folded? You would have made the wrong decision then.It's easy to say "I would have folded" when you can see the other guy's hand, but Hudson played it correctly. There were only a few hands the other guy could have had that would have beaten his pocket 10s. Hudson made the right decision, and it was just plain bad luck. If he had folded in that position, 99 times out of 100 it would have been the wrong decision.
Boredered: It doesn't matter, a full house beats a flush anyway.
|
|
 jimbobsthebe
Male, 18-29, Europe
613 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 7:17:04 AM
Lol, unlucky for the looser. He made the right decision though, even though it didn't pay off this time he had to call. |
|
 s0rd3dvis1on
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
2409 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 5:23:22 AM
fing ey full house on first deal is intense. Although if i had been Hudson and he kept raising with the two aces right infront of me i would have folded. |
|
 Lionhart2
Male, 40-49, Australia
8285 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 5:16:59 AM
I don't really understand the game, when does he call "Snap!"? |
|
 maputo
Male, 40-49, Southern US
79 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 12:25:41 AM
Interesting enough, but not particularly amazing. Can't blame either player for their moves, they each made the right call for the information that they had. That's why its called gambling. |
|
 Boredered
Male, 18-29, Western US
2918 Posts
|
Sunday, March 08, 2009 12:17:12 AM
isnt that a flush? |
|
 TR-Wolf
Male, 18-29, Europe
1565 Posts
|
Saturday, March 07, 2009 11:29:19 PM
What the hell is this? Bo-ring! |
|
hab_theory
Male, 40-49, Canada
10 Posts
|
Saturday, March 07, 2009 11:11:10 PM
I play alot of Poker and have suffered some very bad beats and given bad beats.But to be honest what did the player with TT think sammy had?... I would have put Farhah on AK or AQ.. when the turn was a Queen - TT was most likely beat. Sammy would have checked the Turn hoping for a bet and then made a value bet on the River.. Player with TT could have had a few chips left even after a River call.
|
|
 Batmanners
Male, 18-29, Canada
4012 Posts
|
Saturday, March 07, 2009 10:21:47 PM
and before you start attacking me Lando, I was just adding on, not correcting. =P |
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}