Page: 1 2 3 4 Next > Jump to:  Bottom  Last Post
 Melancholies
Female, 18-29, Eastern US
 53 Posts
|
Friday, August 29, 2008 8:28:26 PM
*snerk*This is ridiculous. |
|
 Quik2TheStab
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
665 Posts
|
Sunday, March 23, 2008 4:07:57 PM
okasen, will you marry me? |
|
 Okasen
Female, 13-17, Southern US
714 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:05:48 PM
Eh, this is a Kentucky law. Only thing I get from them is Chicken.
---
and thats not even that good.but ona side note... kentucky has TECHNOLOGY? |
|
Pilanus
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
674 Posts
|
Sunday, March 16, 2008 12:25:58 PM
I wonder what 4chan will say, |
|
 Phantom7
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
945 Posts
|
Thursday, March 13, 2008 5:54:04 AM
@dover19whatevs i really could care less. if some stalker kills me or whatever...whatevs, but i doupt it...but whatevs...ima eat some cake |
|
 abraham11
Male, 18-29, Western US
20 Posts
|
Thursday, March 13, 2008 3:04:40 AM
try this u will not be able to believe in ur eye that it could also possible
click here http://www.heroesmindreader.com/?um=40
|
|
borrisio
Male, 13-17, Europe
2 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:50:43 PM
figures that the person who owns the site gets fined instead of the guy who is bullying the person |
|
 Chamerion
Female, 13-17, Canada
120 Posts
|
Wednesday, March 12, 2008 2:56:23 PM
I guess those people warning children not to use their personal information are just going against the government, then. |
|
 bianchi
Female, 18-29, Western US
613 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 10:51:22 PM
the internet is full of crazy people and as much as i want to kill cyber bullies and trolls, there is no way we can get rid of them. this law is totally not gonna happen. |
|
Ilbeltz
Male, 18-29, Southern US
108 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:53:56 PM
With the advent of proxies and other such anonymous connection services, they would have no way of tracing the attack. But forget that. Even if they did, how would they deal with them? There are plenty of ways to misconstrue a comment on the internet as a personal attack, and there are plenty of crazy people on the internet who would make up false charges. And just how would we deal with the sheer number of people filling our jails just because they called someone a faggot in a chatroom? I mean, good lord, half of these people would be kids. The fact is, there's no way this law would pass. No way in hell, in fact, because any self-respecting judge would see the implications of this idiocy and cut it at the bud. |
|
Ilbeltz
Male, 18-29, Southern US
108 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:50:10 PM
Haha! 1984, here we come!But seriously, folks. Everyone on here, with the exception of MAYBE Aric is an anonymous poster. Unless you give out your full name and identity that's just what you are. This is what makes the internet so beautiful and useless. You can be anyone you want to be on the internet, from a 15 year old girl to a burly viking man and no one would ever be able to tell the difference. Even if this law goes through and we're forced to have names online, there's no reason we couldn't just lie about it. They can't change the way the internet works (especially not in other countries), and if they did they would have to create a special brand new internet for the US and it's totalitarian gov't. Maybe call it... Freedom-net, since the word freedom has somehow become synonymous with the destruction of personal liberties. The truth is, even if they made it where a victim of "internet bullying" were to phone in an attack, how would they know who did it? cont. |
|
 Monsdurr
Male, 13-17, Western US
751 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 5:31:35 PM
*Cough* My name is uh....Shacklford. Rusty Shackleford. |
|
 Aqausixio
Female, 18-29, Australia
1433 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 5:00:56 PM
GOOD LUCKY trying to enforce that law! |
|
 Kyur
Male, 18-29, Western US
900 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 2:55:13 PM
>>FloridaSnow
Already did, unfortunately it died withing a minute.Also it wouldn't effect the world, just servers in the U.S. Also companies would go bankrupt from having to having to have better servers. It takes up more memory, more bandwidth, all that. |
|
 rro
Female, 13-17, Canada
182 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 2:23:39 PM
Forced Anon would soon be Forced Namefags.
...Fu*king Soviet russia Jokes.Intornets is srs business guise |
|
 gorgack2000
Male, 13-17, Europe
4702 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 1:45:16 PM
I doubt this will get very far...
"Represntative Couch says enforcing this bill if it became law would be a challenge." |
|
 FloridaSnow
Male, 18-29, Midwest US
625 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 1:09:49 PM
OH SHI-Someone call for /b/lackup |
|
 LazyMe484
Male, 18-29, Canada
10503 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:37:59 PM
Good luck dumbass Kentucky lawmaker! Bahahaha! No one controls the net! Except me!! nah jk, I was just thinking about 'The Core'. |
|
 dover19
Male, 18-29, Canada
47 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:29:33 PM
lol, Phantom7 that's such a stupid statement: "i do not do anything wrong so i don't really mind".It's not about be able to do wrong and get away with it, ti's the fact that your name and address would be publicly available for anyone to find. Privacy is already a problem, this would make it even worst. |
|
 Lixa123
Female, 18-29, Europe
585 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 11:25:52 AM
That is poo. If that ever happened, the entire internet would shut down. Full names, emails and ADDRESSES? Wtf? Hell to that. We're already a paranoid world, we don't need to add to it. |
|
 MadhatterVTR
Male, 18-29, Western US
197 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 10:58:56 AM
I have been puting off creating an account here just because I was too lazy to click the few buttons, but I felt obliged to comment on this... This is just rediculous, this infringes on our 1st amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. Which pretty much means it cant happen. And even if by some freak way it did, as stated above, people will just move their servers to overseas servers, thus eliminating the necessity of personal info. Which would still mean, internets-1,000,000,000 Gov't-0 |
|
Wey_Pooh
Male, 18-29, Eastern US
1023 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 10:09:34 AM
lol This guy doesn't know how to Internet works.
Some old guy from Kentucky is going to tell the world what to do and how to use the Internet? lmao |
|
 Foob
Male, 40-49, Europe
383 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:53:26 AM
"Some said they felt it was a violation of First Amendment rights. Others say it is a good tool toward eliminating online harassment."Damn, confusion, I agree with both standpoints. There IS too much trolling on the nets, but it's also a place to be silly without repercussions.
What to do, what to do. |
|
 muckseen
Female, 18-29, Europe
137 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:13:45 AM
:O But then everyone on World of Warcraft (or similar fantasy RP games) will have to give up their tough-sounding nicknames "Org Eater of Children" and admit their much less frightening real names "Myron B. Pennybottom" or whatever >.> that, it seems, would lead to more bullying.
Awful jokes aside, I'd like to see this Kentucky bloke find my country on a map, never mind banning me from posting anonymously at home.
|
|
 skypirate
Male, 18-29, Western US
1824 Posts
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:03:30 AM
bad idea! fudgec big brother! |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next >
|
Back to Listing
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}
){kind=avatar}