Monday, April 28, 2014 6:47:16 AM
I have to agree with JohnFred on this one. They aren't really "Pervs". If you saw a bulge like that you`d look. The inner dialog would be something like: "Is that??? No. It has to be his pants. **Wait to see when he moves**. Holy crap! It is!!"
Do the woman like it; out on display like that? I`m sure some do and some don`t. You can`t blame them for looking anymore than you can blame someone for looking at a woman with huge, mostly exposed breasts.
Monday, April 28, 2014 12:59:32 AM
It's fair to say that if you have any kind of physical discrepancy, it`s going to attract some attention from people in an environment where they`re within close proximity to you for a length of time.
Obviously, if your, `lunch`, is made to look a little larger than usual and you make no effort to conceal the fact, it`s going to draw some attention from some people.
They`re hardly pervs. If a whole lot of them were to suddenly move opposite the person sat down and went out of their way to ogle his crotch, then you might have a case. But, having women who happen to be sat opposite on a train, occasionally looking down to see what must be quite obvious to anyone who spent more than a few seconds within the field of view, cannot be described as, `perving`, in any way, any more than if a woman with large bussoms sat in a revealingly low-cut blouse would to any men sat opposite her.