Tuesday, March 18, 2014 2:34:43 AM
In programming, I'd argue the main group we all share is "union" and the subsets of that are "marriage" (M-F) and then gay unions (F-F and M-M). Go ahead, argue that a penis and a vagina are the same as two penises! Go ahead prove me wrong!
That is a superfluous criterion. Since marriage is a right, there is no qualification regarding gender of either party. Men are free to marry other men just as women are and vice versa. It is that straightforward.
Monday, March 17, 2014 1:04:38 PM
Oh please, 11+ pages of arguments of this ridiculous list? That's just crazy right there. People that buy this are only what liberals think conservatives are like. I love how the proponents of gay marriage avoid the obvious. Now, I am not saying I hate gays or they should die or anything of the sort; rather just the opposite. I treat them with love and respect. But it is crystal clear that same-sex marriage is different! Let`s be simple; M-F is different than M-M which is different than F-F, Clearly M-F is at least in part for reproduction, correct? Hence, different! They should not be treated the same! That said, gays should not be treated so horribly! In programming, I`d argue the main group we all share is "union" and the subsets of that are "marriage" (M-F) and then gay unions (F-F and M-M). Go ahead, argue that a penis and a vagina are the same as two penises! Go ahead prove me wrong! Then, maybe I`ll change my mind.
Monday, March 17, 2014 11:01:38 AM
This has been my most favorite post on IAB ever. We saw some fantastic debating and logical arguments. We saw some low grade trolling, some stupidity, and some epic level space-time warping density.
A sincere "Thank You" to all involved in the logic argument of pages 2ish to 8ish.
Equality for all means equality for all, even when it's hard. Civil unions do not offer the same (I am almost afraid to use this word...)rights that a marriage does. Separate but equal? Really?