I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
Latest Popular Most Bookmarked Most Emailed Top Rated My Favorites Random Chat
All Games Funny Entertainment Quizzes Weird Tech Lifestyle, Arts & Lit. News & Politics Science Sports Misc
T-Shirts   Submit Content  

Asking An Atheist [Pic]

submitted by: Sweepofdeath
< Back Next >
Hits: 6068 | Favorites: 0 | Emailed: 0 | Rating: 2.8 | Category: Misc. | Date: 03/04/2014
 popular today
The Power Of Christ Compels You! [Pic] Next time try using something else besides a lightning rod. So many questions...
Stewardess Warns Passengers To Dump Drugs [Pic] Drug dogs were waiting at the gate for the flight returning from the Splendour in the Grass festival. Was she wrong?
What Does One TRILLION Dollars Look Like? [Pix] Just to give you some idea.
10 Ways Humans May Go Extinct [Pix] All good things must come to an end, sometime. These are a few ways that humans may just fade into the past.
World`s Oldest Examples Of Ordinary Things [Pix] Hmmm, Zoidberg invented socks?
More Comments >

Male, 40-49, Europe
 12381 Posts
Wednesday, March 5, 2014 7:19:25 PM
Something doesn't exist unless there is proof of it`s existence.

By that standard, nothing exists. The only thing that can be *proven* by strict standards is the correctness of pure maths (which does not apply to any application of any maths to reality).

[quote]Any shred of evidence that can`t be explained away will do.[/quote]

That`s not proof. That`s evidence. Different thing.

You`re citing an impossibly high standard (proof) and a very low standard (any shred of evidence for which there isn`t currently an explanation) at the same time and portraying them as the same thing. That doesn`t work.

Also, by your second standard numerous gods were "proved" to exist in the past and could be today with some more effort.

Lightning is a good example. It couldn`t be explained away in northern Europe ~2000 years ago. So it "proved" the existence of Thor, right?

Male, 40-49, Europe
 12381 Posts
Wednesday, March 5, 2014 7:10:24 PM
"we do not have evidence that deities do not exist. We have an absence of evidence that they do."

Wrong person. I didn't write that. Although it is strictly true, I think it`s close to meaningless because it`s true of anything specifically created to be unfalsifiable.

Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 2353 Posts
Wednesday, March 5, 2014 3:52:48 PM

we have more proof of unicorns then of God

Again, you're confusing `proof` and `evidence`.

Male, 18-29, Midwest US
 2353 Posts
Wednesday, March 5, 2014 3:51:59 PM

Something doesn't exist unless there is proof of it`s existence

So... the Higgs Boson only recently came into existence?

Lacking proof of existence does not prove non-existence.

Male, 40-49, Canada
 4701 Posts
Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:51:49 AM
"It's important to use the correct words lest you look arrogant. Firstly, there is no "proof" either way; we only have evidence."

Actually, the falsities in the Bible, the very book that the entire religion is based on, are more than enough to use the word "proof". If the religion is based on the word of God and that word is interpreted from the Bible and the Bible is so contradictory and messed up that in no way is it correct, then the "Word of God" is not correct and you are basing your religion on muddled together group of stories that are wrong. The Bible, all on it`s own, proves that Christianity is incorrect. It doesn`t prove that there is no God, but you can safely say there is no Christian God.

More Comments >

Bored | Suggest a Link | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2015 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.