It is one of the dirty little practices used by doctors who aren't very good and don`t know what they are doing. It isn`t for the inmates benefit in anyway. A lot of crappy doctors go to work for the prison contractors because they can do those sorts of things and still draw a paycheck.
The administrators are sort of aware of such practices but it is impossible to prove and by law they have to keep a certain amount of doctors on hand, and most Doctors don`t want to apply to a position where the patients are willing to attack them, so they have deal with the doctors they have.
The bad Doctor can always claim the proper tools weren`t sterilized, say they felt ill, or any number of other excuses. Often the schedulers will try to direct only inmates that the Doctor has the ability to work on without getting sued. Its not something talked about, but it`s something that is sort of known by the Doctors who work there.
Thursday, February 5, 2015 5:59:54 PM
I can and will say my part, and I will always be respectful of your views, but you can not simply delete mine. Remember this little squirrel...
"Censorship is saying: 'I`m the one who says the last sentence. Whatever you say, the conclusion is mine.` But the internet is like a tree that is growing. The people will always have the last word, even if someone has a very weak, quiet voice."
Thursday, February 5, 2015 5:59:29 PM
" I asked you if you had read a single introductory work on climate science. You have not. Most people, if they had developed a hobby of attacking the work of professional scientists on a topic about which they haven't read a single book, might experience a moment of humility at this point. Yet it doesn`t seem to give you a moment`s pause. "
I answered honestly, I focus my debates on the data at hand not simply relying on one source of data. I`ve listen to climate scientists debate on C-span, I use multiple sources on the web, I have read books on volcanology (my personal hobby), geology, and Paleontology. But mostly, I read the actual studies and form my own opinions instead of basing my opinion on other peoples think and I always cite links. Plus as you know if a person can point out where I`m wrong and I agree, I will openly and freely admit it and wish the person kudos.
Sunday, March 9, 2014 10:42:06 AM
I usually don't bring it up because again you know my feelings on appeals to authority but since you constantly attack McIntyre. I felt I should just let you know how authorities you`ve mentioned in the past stack up, since I just usually let it slide.
" Diedrich, why don`t you take your dog for a walk and give the internet a rest? "
Oh no that`s ok, I got like 30 more minutes then I`ll turn it over to you, but first I`d like to address your accusations.
"For my part, I`ve simply stated that I find extended AGW debates on IAB unproductive. This is primarily an entertainment website that people visit to have fun. Chill, dude."
I disagree, I have had wonderfully in-depth conversations on here, and yes I have seen consensus where previously disagreement had first occurred. But don`t worry man, I don`t know if you got the wrong impression about what I said about rudeness, but I`m as cool as a cucumber, no worries.