Sunday, August 3, 2014 3:32:27 PM
The Xia et al. I researched because you had asked and I was able to link Wan et al. because I actually read Xia et al., it cites it several times actually, but no yet once again this is not from climate audit.
Lastly, I got this study from here. As you can see its definitely not climate audit and as you can see Phil Duffy, Climate Central's chief scientist, also thinks warming is linked to clouds and not greenhouse gasses in general.
But what`s that 0 links out of 6 came from climate audit. Honestly, I don`t know how you come to these conclusions. Just because I disagree with you does not mean I only go to one site.
Sunday, March 9, 2014 10:49:23 AM
I can and will say my part, and I will always be respectful of your views, but you can not simply delete mine. Remember this little squirrel...
"Censorship is saying: 'I`m the one who says the last sentence. Whatever you say, the conclusion is mine.` But the internet is like a tree that is growing. The people will always have the last word, even if someone has a very weak, quiet voice."
Sunday, March 9, 2014 10:42:27 AM
" I asked you if you had read a single introductory work on climate science. You have not. Most people, if they had developed a hobby of attacking the work of professional scientists on a topic about which they haven't read a single book, might experience a moment of humility at this point. Yet it doesn`t seem to give you a moment`s pause. "
I answered honestly, I focus my debates on the data at hand not simply relying on one source of data. I`ve listen to climate scientists debate on C-span, I use multiple sources on the web, I have read books on volcanology (my personal hobby), geology, and Paleontology. But mostly, I read the actual studies and form my own opinions instead of basing my opinion on other peoples think and I always cite links. Plus as you know if a person can point out where I`m wrong and I agree, I will openly and freely admit it and wish the person kudos.
Sunday, March 9, 2014 10:42:06 AM
I usually don't bring it up because again you know my feelings on appeals to authority but since you constantly attack McIntyre. I felt I should just let you know how authorities you`ve mentioned in the past stack up, since I just usually let it slide.
" Diedrich, why don`t you take your dog for a walk and give the internet a rest? "
Oh no that`s ok, I got like 30 more minutes then I`ll turn it over to you, but first I`d like to address your accusations.
"For my part, I`ve simply stated that I find extended AGW debates on IAB unproductive. This is primarily an entertainment website that people visit to have fun. Chill, dude."
I disagree, I have had wonderfully in-depth conversations on here, and yes I have seen consensus where previously disagreement had first occurred. But don`t worry man, I don`t know if you got the wrong impression about what I said about rudeness, but I`m as cool as a cucumber, no worries.