Wednesday, January 15, 2014 1:06:34 AM
What hell is the court's argument in this? What is the extent of this... does anyone here know? are "slow lanes" 90% of the speed of the "fast lane" subscribers or can it be whatever they want, 56k speeds for the "non-allied" sites? Does this mean that ISPs can basically make or break content providers? Seems like a really bad idea. If my ISP implements some goofy system, I`ll jump ship so fast. Hopefully some new ISPs appear that promise not to meddle with my connection.