I Am Bored

Loads of viral videos, games, memes, lists and social networking for when you're bored. Updated every day, so visit often.
Latest Popular Most Bookmarked Most Emailed Top Rated My Favorites Random Chat
All Games Funny Entertainment Quizzes Weird Tech Lifestyle, Arts & Lit. News & Politics Science Sports Misc
T-Shirts   Submit Content  

Richard Alley Discusses The Weather

CNN interviews one of the giants in the field of climate science regarding the recent cold.

submitted by: Squrlz4Sale
< Back Next >
Richard Alley Discusses The Weather. CNN interviews one of the giants in the field of climate science regarding the recent cold.
+ Add to Favs
View/Add
Hits: 2734 | Favorites: 1 | Emailed: 0 | Rating: 3.4 | Category: Science | Date: 01/08/2014
 
 popular today
When Creepy Obsessions Go Too Far [Pix] One Direction? Try WRONG Direction. (Someone hide the knives!)
Frustrated Response [Pic] The purpose must be to confuse the f*ck out of parents trying to help their kids with simple math.
The New And Improved Shocker? [Pic] When he flips you the bird, you KNOW he means it.
50 Gorgeous Girls In Glasses [Pix] Every one of these smoking hotties is guaranteed to give you double vision.
The Job Interview From Hell [Pic] Trying to get a new job? Then DO NOT follow this guy`s example. Do not pass go, Do not get job, Go directly to jail.
More Comments >

Squrlz4Sale
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
 6018 Posts
Sunday, January 12, 2014 7:13:32 PM
@ Broizfam: Thanks--although you may be the only one still reading the thread at this point.

I have to say, it's rather difficult to discuss AGW with people on IAB who are not particularly knowledgeable--and it`s not because of what they don`t know. It`s because of the misinformation that they *think* they know that they have picked up from either far-right anti-AGW blogs or Fox News. Usually 90% of my energies--and 100% of the other person`s patience--is spent on dispelling untruths.

The sorry consequence of this is I seldom get a chance to give the other person basic, honest information and resources with which he could start doing his own investigation of the issue, from either a pro-AGW position or an anti-AGW position.

broizfam
Male, 50-59, Eastern US
 3672 Posts
Saturday, January 11, 2014 8:41:49 AM
@Squrlz,
Brilliant response! Also, thank you for the education and for showing us how to do it in a non-judgemental fashion.

Squrlz4Sale
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
 6018 Posts
Friday, January 10, 2014 4:01:12 AM
(Cont'd)

ENDNOTES

* Since the correlation between temperature and tree rings breaks down after 1960, you might be wondering how tree rings can be trusted as proxy data for much earlier periods. To verify the accuracy of tree rings as a proxy, dendroclimatologists have spent decades comparing them to other proxies such as lake and ocean sediments, ice cores, coral growth, pollen grains, and water isotopes. Those comparisons have confirmed that prior to 1960, the tree ring data are reliable.

** The eight investigations that exonerated the climatologists are:
(1) House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK);
(2) Independent Climate Change Review (UK);
(3) International Science Assessment Panel (UK);
(4) Penn State University 1st Investigative Panel (US);
(5) Penn State University 2nd Investigative Panel (US);
(6) United States EPA (US);
(7) Department of Commerce (US); and
(8) National Science Foundation (US).

Squrlz4Sale
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
 6018 Posts
Friday, January 10, 2014 2:02:32 AM
(Cont'd)

Clearly, the idea that Jones was talking about "hiding a decline" in TEMPERATURES since 1961 and 1981 is absurd: accurate, modern-day temperature records abound and there`s no way anyone`s going to hide them, regardless of what direction they`re headed in.

Bear in mind that this simply isn`t my personal interpretation of Jones` email. As I mentioned earlier in this thread, eight separate investigations** have looked into the "Climategate" emails and found no evidence of fraud or scientific misconduct.

Hope this helps.

(Cont`d)

Squrlz4Sale
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
 6018 Posts
Friday, January 10, 2014 2:02:16 AM
(Cont'd)

The "decline" that is being referred to by Jones is not a decline in temperatures. It`s a decline in the correlation between temperature and tree ring growth that has occurred since about 1960. Prior to 1960, tree rings serve as an excellent proxy for temperature records; post 1960, for reasons that are not well understood but that probably have to do with acid rain and other forms of pollution, they do not.

The problem is so well-known among climatologists it`s usually referred to in shorthand fashion as "the (tree-ring) divergence problem."

What Jones is stating in his email is that he used the same technique that Mann had employed in a *Nature* article of using tree-ring proxy data up to the recent past and then extended the trendline using modern temperature records. Tree-ring data measurements later than 1960, he`s saying, have been dropped from the chart because of the divergence problem.*

(Cont`d)

More Comments >
 


Bored | Suggest a Link | Contact I Am Bored | About I Am Bored | Link to I Am Bored | Live Submission | Privacy | TOS | Ad Choices | Copyright Policy |
© 2014 Demand Media, Inc. All rights reserved.